similar to: Probleme with bitrate when encoding small files

Bugs item #16211, was opened at 2007-12-10 15:40 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=16211&group_id=85 Category: win32-service Group: Packaging Status: Closed Resolution: Rejected Priority: 3 Submitted By: Sorin Sbarnea (intersol) Assigned to: Daniel Berger (djberg96) Summary: win32-service will not install/build corectly if the system

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 srhilber at ncsu.edu wrote: > I've managed to get LLVM 1.8 to build properly with MSVC8 with some > effort. Most of the changes necessary were very minor C++ usage issues; > for instance, VC8 can't deal with prototyping something that's really a > class as 'struct Foo;' or vice versa (it creates issues with matching > function signatures

Hello, I've managed to get LLVM 1.8 to build properly with MSVC8 with some effort. Most of the changes necessary were very minor C++ usage issues; for instance, VC8 can't deal with prototyping something that's really a class as 'struct Foo;' or vice versa (it creates issues with matching function signatures during linking.) Additionally, I had to do quite a few updates to the

Hi all! Does anyone successfully use the VC8/VS2005 command line tools (cl.exe and link.exe) with wine yet? I'm trying to setup VC8 in our cross compiling environment (which already works perfectly with VC7), but have some problems here. After some tries, I can now run cl.exe with wine to compile our sources (although some command line parameters cause the program to crash, but that's not

I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided how to make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would abstract llvm compiler dependant C++ code emittion. 2) the ret instruction should be able to return structs (as Chris has already

On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: > I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided how to > make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: > 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the > first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would > abstract llvm compiler dependant C++ code emittion. Sure.

I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided how to make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would abstract llvm compiler dependant C++ code emition. 2) the ret instruction should be able to return structs (as Chris has already

Hello Guys, I''m trying to get this working: t = Thread.new { while true puts "printing a line" sleep 2 end } gets t.exit puts "exiting" As you see, the idea is get multiple "printing a line" until a hit enter. The thing is this is a known problem for 1.8 on win32. I tried both mingw, VC6 and VC8 with the same results. Saw a post

Chris Lattner pravi: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: >> I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided >> how to >> make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: >> 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the >> first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would >>

Hi, Have you tried the new VC8 Beta? It's been out for less than 2 weeks: http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/visualc/default.aspx It's supposed to have improved standards compliance. Regards, -Eugene Talagrand On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 01:56:03 -0500 (CDT) > From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> > Reply-To: llvmdev at

Hi Jeff and Morten, I was just wondering if below wisdom is true, why not prefix every solution and project file with VC71 in front of the file name to signal the case that it is only designed for that specific IDE/tool? This gives us room for comming up with other solution and project files for another MS specific IDE/tool independt of each other. Henrik. ----Original Message Follows----

It's a possibility, though it would be better to create whole separate trees for different versions of VS. It's not just the project and solutions that need to be kept separate; the object files themselves cannot be mixed between different versions of VS. There's no rush though. Trust me, C/C++ programmers will not rush to adopt Whidbey once it's released. You'd be

Ah, interesting, have not ran across that before (as I always strive to never use the same name as any scope previously), but rather interesting that GCC gets it wrong while VC++ gets it right, kind of a switch. And yes, that switch I mentioned is for VC6 style in VC7.1 (what I use), you have to switch it to make it conformant, nice to hear VC8 does it correctly by default now. On Thu, Oct 2,

I agree completely with you, Jeff. However, I think it somehow would be nice, if you guys could tell comming users that the win32 solution is geared toward VC++ 7.1 (and hence use of other tools are at their own risk). And, I think it also would be really cool, if you guys come up with a solution how to handle multiple VC++ x solutions/projects from the same source, possibly ranging from VC

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > LLVMers, > > The 2.4 pre-release is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.4/ > > If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. > Please do the following: > > 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use

Hi. After upgrading my Debian (installed a brand new Wheezy 64bits a few months ago), I decided to reinstall Civ4, and its amazing sequel BTS. Both applications finally installed (I had a problem with .net...), but now something is teribly wrong : Civ4 starts and plays just fine, but BTS, after starting, crashes when I clic "Play". The error message is the following : Unhandled

Hi, I'm running into errors trying to launch Civilization IV (both basic and BtS). I followed the instructions from the thread below: http://osdir.com/ml/wine-users/2009-08/msg00427.html ...and changed OffscreenRenderingMode to "backbuffer". This solves the problem described there but runs into another. Setting it to "pbuffer" gives the same result: -------8<--------

Hi, I would like to contribute a howto page about the configuration of Spacewalk for package management under CentOS 5. Spacewalk is the upstream project for the source of RedHat Network Satellite. It provides a management interface for software updates across registered servers and desktops. Here is were I would like to put this page: <http://www.redhat.com/red_hat_network/>

At boot time, the system is looking for a resume signature on the default SWAP partition that was defined during the OS installation. On several systems, I changed the location of the SWAP partition. How do I change the location where the system looks at boot time for the resume signature? Thanks, -- Patrice Guay patrice.guay at nanotechnologies.qc.ca

Hi all, I am proud to announce the release of Tao Live 5.00. This live CD is based on the Beta release of CentOS 5 and includes multimedia enhancements from rpmforge.net repository. Tao Live uses a Squash filesystem to fit 2 GB of programs into a standard bootable CD. OpenOffice.org, Firefox, Gaim, XMMS, MPlayer, K3B and many other programs are included. Tao Live 5.00 is available via