similar to: Issue with the "Xiph license"

Hello! I wrote a blog post requesting help for Theora on MSVC-syntax assembly. This is my first time speaking for Xiph instead of just myself so please teach me what to do better next time. (Better offlist probably.) My post might contain a few interesting bits for Xiph members as well. It can be found here: http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=86 Sebastian

I mean this one: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/xspf/ It has 6 messages in total. The reason why I think we should kill it is that it potentially confuses people looking the XSPF mailing list. What do you think? Who has is able to such a cleanup task? Sebastian

Any objections to sorting the list of projects on http://xiph.org/downloads/ alphabetically? This is the order that we have currently: libogg libvorbis vorbis-tools libtheora libspeex libflac libao libxspf vorbis-java I can do it if you let me. Sebastian

Hello, I write to you for the announcement in this blog: http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=86. I am interested in the open-source solution proposed in this article (the preprocessor-macros solution). Have you solved the problem? Does the offer still stands? Kind Regards, Fernando Pelliccioni. Buenos Aires, Argentina

Hello! I'd like to add the missing link for "TheoraSoftwarePlayers" to the mainpage. I don't feel like asking Ivo for doing Wiki edits every time is a long term solution. Can you give me admin rights for the Xiph wiki? I'd also like to link to the People page from the front page. Any idea what section I should put that link in? Thanks in advance, Sebastian

... and was wondering how it differs from the official libvorbis and why there is need for a fork. Could somebody shed some light on the past and background of the libvorbis/aoTuV story please? Both on- and offlist mails are welcome. Thanks in advance, Sebastian

I just checked out trunk/vorbis to build the latest libvorbis, and noticed an inconsistency in the project settings. For the two build configurations Debug and Release, we have as the Output Directory "$(SolutionDir)$(ConfigurationName)", and the Intermediate Directory "Debug". ("Release" for the Release configuration) However, for the two build configurations

Hello! I stumbled upon the blog of Xiph member Arek Korbik [1] a few minutes ago and the "planet idea" came to my mind again. What I mean is a website collection posts from a number of blogs as Planet KDE [2] is doing for example. Is there such a thing for Xiph? Is there interest in having such a thing? If so would there be a chance to cover the domain costs from past/future

I have a few thoughs and questions about donating to Xiph that I hop you have a minute for. Here we go: == "Who donated what" list == As it seems we don't have a "Who donated what" list. I thought creating such a list could increase motivation to donate to some parties. What I currently have in mind would be to start listing donations from now on below the current content

In downloads.html, link to downloads.xiph.org instead of SourceForge for source tarballs. Also includes a minor language fix in developers.html. --- developers.html | 2 +- download.html | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/developers.html b/developers.html index 149b6b5..87f0a9a 100644 --- a/developers.html +++ b/developers.html @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@

Hello there, My situation is as follows: =we make commercial freeware/shareware games =our games are released without code and can NOT be modified or have projects based on it. =would like to use Speex functions (library) within the game for some vocal sound effects, it would basically be a part of the EXE itself. Under the Xiph.org license, it states: "Redistributions in binary form must

On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:11:13PM +0100, Steve Lhomme wrote: > Well, I think going GPL would be too much, only GPL softwares could use > the library. This is a common misconception, but entirely untrue. There are many free software licenses, including the BSD-style licenses, which are compatible with the GPL. You can read more about various free software licenses here:

----- On 1 Nov, 2017, at 13:07, Chris Adams linux at cmadams.net wrote: | Once upon a time, Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> said: |> On 11/01/2017 03:25 PM, Chris Adams wrote: |> >Once upon a time, Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> said: |> >>Okay, so it looks like I can simply change ksdevice=eth0? to |> >>bootdev=eth0, correct? |> >I

Hello everyone, It's been a while since the last meeting and issues are starting to pile up again. I propose a meeting at the 16th of May, next Wednesday at 6:00 am UTC. Does everyone agree with time/day? Agenda may be found at http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/MonthlyMeeting200705 Preliminary Agenda: * Google Summer of Code 2007; how are the projects/candidates going? * discussing current

Hello everyone, It's been a while since the last meeting and issues are starting to pile up again. I propose a meeting at the 16th of May, next Wednesday at 6:00 am UTC. Does everyone agree with time/day? Agenda may be found at http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/MonthlyMeeting200705 Preliminary Agenda: * Google Summer of Code 2007; how are the projects/candidates going? * discussing current

Hello everyone, It's been a while since the last meeting and issues are starting to pile up again. I propose a meeting at the 16th of May, next Wednesday at 6:00 am UTC. Does everyone agree with time/day? Agenda may be found at http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/MonthlyMeeting200705 Preliminary Agenda: * Google Summer of Code 2007; how are the projects/candidates going? * discussing current

Hello everyone, It's been a while since the last meeting and issues are starting to pile up again. I propose a meeting at the 16th of May, next Wednesday at 6:00 am UTC. Does everyone agree with time/day? Agenda may be found at http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/MonthlyMeeting200705 Preliminary Agenda: * Google Summer of Code 2007; how are the projects/candidates going? * discussing current

Hello everyone, It's been a while since the last meeting and issues are starting to pile up again. I propose a meeting at the 16th of May, next Wednesday at 6:00 am UTC. Does everyone agree with time/day? Agenda may be found at http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/MonthlyMeeting200705 Preliminary Agenda: * Google Summer of Code 2007; how are the projects/candidates going? * discussing current

Good afternoon. The ISC (Internet Software Consortium) license[1] is a permissive, open-source license that is considered "functionally equivalent"[2] to the Simplified (2-clause) BSD[3] and MIT[4] licenses, but with extraneous language removed. There is at least one package on CRAN which incorporates some code using it[5]. Are there plans to include this license in the list at

Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:11:13PM +0100, Steve Lhomme wrote: > > > Well, I think going GPL would be too much, only GPL softwares could use > > the library. > > This is a common misconception, but entirely untrue. There are many > free software licenses, including the BSD-style licenses, which are > compatible with the