similar to: Added native socks support to libc in FreeBSD 7

Hi, i added a native (client) Socks V4/V5 support inside FreeBSD libc library. The work is based of my project (see http://csocks.altervista.org) CSOCKS. You can get it here: http://csocks.altervista.org/download/FreeBSD_libc.tar.gz CHANGES: I changed the file: /usr/src/lib/libc/Makefile I added the Directory: /usr/src/lib/libc/socks They contains the files:

Yes. I am one of them. ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy -------- Original message --------From: Raffaele Gambelli <R.Gambelli at hitachi-systems-cbt.com> Date: 23/02/2018 12:25 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re: Stale mailbox lock file Thanks Aki, do you know if this list is read by dovecot developers team too? Could you point me to the right list otherwise? Raffaele Gambelli

<font face="Default Sans Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"> <div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So you don't know when this piece of code is executed:</div> <div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br></div> <div style=""><pre

<font face="Default Sans Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"> <div>Thanks Aki,</div><div><br></div><div>do you know if this list is read by dovecot developers team too? Could you point me to the right list otherwise?</div> <div><br><br>Raffaele

<font face="Default Sans Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"> <div>Thanks but what answer it mean "<span style="font-size: 12.8px;">doveconf -n"? </span> </div><div><span style="font-size: 12.8px;">I have neither control nor access in the dovecot installation to which I'm

Asterisk 1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC8a on a Debian 3.1 The system is connected with an HFC card directly to the telco line card is in TE mode and signalling used is bri_cpe_ptmp I am able to dial out some "numbers" and some not. In particular it seems that i can't call mobiles and special telco numbers like the information call center, emergency numbers,... If i use a normal

For what I can see there is no socks support built in in wine and also if u try to force socks tunneling through tsocks the windows program are not "socksifed". You can run freecap inside wine and then run through freecap the socksified program and this way it works, but I think it will be a nice to have feature to be able to run through socks. I've already implemented socks

Sorry...I deleted the thread about SOCKS before I realized I knew the solution... I checked up on how SMB connections work on an NT workstation running the Hummingbird SOCKS proxy. It looks like "net use..." and its GUI variant don't use the WINSOCK/WINSOCK 2 interface to make netbios-session (139/tcp) connections. The machine attempted to make a direct connection to the remote

Hi, I am running centos server 4.2 and I have installed dante-server socks proxy I yumed it off a dag repo. The problem I am having is configuring it. I have edited the sockd.conf file but it still tells me that I don''t have an internal address setup. Does anyone have any suggestions. am I editing the wrong config file. if I do a locate sock*.conf I get the following list

Is there anything special in the way of configuration that is required to enable a CentOS box to act as the point of origin for an http request routed to it via a SOCKS ssh link? I have researched this matter and the recommended procedure is to open an SSH connection to the desired host passing the requisite switches so: ssh -f -n -D <port> user at host.domain.tld And then reconfigure

Salutations, I was recently using openssh 6.8p1-3 for socks tunelling with a public wifi hotspot. I attempted to watch youtube but was notified that it was not allowed in my area. The socks server I was connected to definitely had the ability to connect to youtube, so I concluded the issue was with the public wifi hotspot. How much does socks tunneling with openssh obscure? Command : ssh -ND

Hi, I need to setup a socks server on my Centos 4.2 box. I need to have windows clients connect to a remote socks server to force all their traffic through a content filtered proxy server. Does anyone have any suggestions on a good socks server that will work with Centos Thanks Mace

Hi, The attached patch extends the mux listener to accept SOCKS requests in addition to the native mux commands. The rationale behind is that creating tunnels attached to TCP ports is a security hazard in multi-user machines where there is no way to control who connects through the tunnels. On the other hand, The mux UNIX domain socket binds to the file system and regular permissions can be

Since I use the Dante SOCKS library (instead of the NEC libraries), I decided to hack support for them into OpenSSH. Here is the results. Thanks, David $NetBSD$ --- configure.in.orig Wed Dec 29 08:37:01 1999 +++ configure.in Wed Dec 29 08:37:25 1999 @@ -334,6 +341,20 @@ AC_MSG_WARN([*** Disabling lastlog support *** ]) AC_DEFINE(DISABLE_LASTLOG) fi + +dnl Compile with dante SOCKS library

Anyone here using a SOCKS server? I'm using ss5 but there seems to be a strange disconnect issue with it and openvpn. While I'm trying to figure out whether ss5 is at fault, or openvpn, I'd like to try a different SOCKS server. Could you recommend one that works well on CentOS? Thanks. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

Attached is a very small patch that allows the ssh clients to use the socks5 library. It should work with socks4 but is untested. Tested on linux only configure --with-socks configure --with-socks5 Also included is a configure option to disable scp statistics --disable-scp-stats modified files openssh-2.9.9p2/acconfig.h openssh-2.9.9p2/channels.c openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in

Just a warning and a call to action: Theo de Raadt has convinced me to remove SOCKS support from our port of OpenSSH. His argument is that it can be easily and generically implemented as a ProxyCommand. This fits with my desire to keep our divergences from the OpenBSD codebase to a minimum. This looks like a few hours work (for someone more familiar the SOCKS API that I). It is basically a

Hello. OpenSSH has -D option to create socks proxy (take local traffic and send it from remote machine). But sometimes there is an opposite problem: to allow apps on remote machine send traffic from local machine (for example, to get access to intranet resources). Expected syntax (I use -B as fist unused letter, plus it may be memorized as 'back'): ssh -B 127.0.0.1:1080 user at

Hi! This is not exactly a development contibution but more an expression of opinion. Didn't find a better place to send this to. I've been using openssh on Linux for some time now. Works just fine with one exception. Since I work at a company which likes to live behind a wall we use a socks firewall for allowing some connections to the world (we *should* be a part of it, but I'm not

Hello Ben, I have now written this draft guide "Using OpenSSH through a SOCKS compatible firewall on your LAN". I have attatched it to this email. All feedback is welcome, I expect still have a little to add before its ready for its first release. if you wish to give my email address to someone not on the email list please give them openssh at jguk.org JG mouring at