similar to: Serious, inacceptable artefacts with Ogg Vorbis

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25275 Summary: [NV30] Graphical artefacts on PPC64 Product: xorg Version: 7.4 Platform: PowerPC OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30286 Summary: Rendering Artefacts for "EffectFrames" with KWin trunk Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26057 Summary: Artefacts in kde 4 Product: xorg Version: 7.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: alex.vizor at gmail.com

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91247 Bug ID: 91247 Summary: Tomb Raider: Underworld renders lots of artefacts on models and objects Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Salve, till the 28. August midnight the magazin c't has a codec test between AAC, MP3, WMA and Vorbis Ogg online. http://www.heise.de/ct/leserbefragung/hoertest/ <p>Short guide for non German speakers: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- stepp 1 browse to: http://www.heise.de/ct/leserbefragung/hoertest/ Down on that page is a link with the name

> The seq-command produces unnescessary inaccurate results, which can be extremely > annoying. I absolutely do not see the nescessity of numerical garbage > to appear in the following simple case. E.g. try this: > > seq ( 61.55 , 62.00 , by=0.01 ) - round ( seq ( 61.55 , 62.00 , by=0.01 ) , > digits=2 ) An even simpler case may help explain why this is not *unnecessary*

Dear all, I encoded and decoded some files using speex codec and I find out with than when using the original raw file and coding it in NB with different bit rate, complexity or with/without enhancement some kind of slight artefact (a strange low level sound appears) is created at t=1.12 s. This is just before an attack which is present in the signal. I did not try to solve the problems but if

Full_Name: Johannes Prix Version: 2.1.1 OS: WinXP, SuSE Linux Submission from: (NULL) (137.208.41.195) The seq-command produces unnescessary inaccurate results, which can be extremely annoying. I absolutely do not see the nescessity of numerical garbage to appear in the following simple case. E.g. try this: > seq ( 61.55 , 62.00 , by=0.01 ) - round ( seq ( 61.55 , 62.00 , by=0.01 ) ,

Hi, I'm bitten by a bug that is also in the Debian BTS, so I'm not sure you are aware of it. I couldn't find it in the fdo BTS. Anyway the problem is simple. After a successful suspend and resume all window decorations (the places where the shadow was supposed to be, but also the titlebars) are much to colorful (meaning it has some random colors in it). Moving the windows brings the

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105173 Nick Lee <nvlbox at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QA Contact| |xorg-team at lists.x.org Component|General |Driver/nouveau Version|XOrg git

Hello, everybody I run the following program, and depending on the size of eps I get different results. With eps=1e-05, the program calculates wrong values for x=65:67 and others. The program runs fine with eps=1e-07. Why is this so? Also, I am using area() instead of integrate() because I cannot make integrate to work, especially with imaginary numbers. Maybe someone can show me how to use

Dear R-Users, my dataset contains timeseries that are structured into task-specific epochs as labelled by a factor and a boolean variable for labelling each data-point within the series as artefact or non-artefact. Now there's no problem in addressing continuous task-specific time-series that are free from artefacts as long as artefacts extend to either boundary of adjacent timeseries but

Hi, I want to write a plugin that uses JavaScript and I am wondering how to put the static content, i.e. the JavaScript, in place? I read the documentation I found ( http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/Plugins and links) and looked at the listed plugins. One thing I found was that subversion seems to be a prerequisite for providing or even installing plugins. Is that right? The other thing

On 10/31/2017 07:08 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote: > as MP3 and Opus have very similar objectives, I think the original poster's > question was a valid one: Why does Opus have more artefacts in the lower > frequency ranges than MP3 has? I'm not sure, but my best guess would be "because MP3's window is very leaky and MP3 has to waste a lot of bits in the LF because of

A question about: Kalman in R, time series and deJong-Penzer statistic - how to compute it using available artefacts of KalmanXXXXX? Background. in the paper http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/statistics/documents/researchreport34.pdf 'Diagnosing Shocks in TIme Series', de Jong and Penzer construct a statistic (tau) which can be used to locate potential shocks. [p15, Theorem 6.1 and

Hi Jean Marc and everyone else :-) I am a bit of an alien here, my expertise is not at all in DSP: I am in network games and recently I started to work in a team dedicated to audio for games. Our prefered codec is speex, mainly for its quality/bandwidth ratio and of course because it is open source. You DSP guys would probably curse us if you saw what kind of ugly things we do to compressed

Hi Everyone, I just merged a lot of changes in the CELT master branch. This should solve the following issues: - tonal artefacts (birdies) at low bit-rate - tonal artefacts in stereo at all rates - low-frequency noise (roughness) on low bit-rate speech The code has been simplified a lot, but there's lots of changes, so please give this a try and see if anything got broken. Cheers,

Hi guys, as MP3 and Opus have very similar objectives, I think the original poster's question was a valid one: Why does Opus have more artefacts in the lower frequency ranges than MP3 has? The spontaneous suspect that lower frequency artefacts may be more noticeably than higher frequency artefacts seems plausible, also. Is it a matter of energy (which is higher for higher frequencies)? When

Hi Guys Sorry, this is off-topic here but relates to current use of CELT and/or Opus in real-world systems. If there's a better forum to ask this question please let me know. I'm wondering if anyone can point me in the direction of software I can use right now that will give me high-quality point-to-point live audio streaming accross the internet. Kind of like Skype, but designed

Hi All. I have an application where the sample rate of the sender and receiver can vary by a small margin and the latency needs to be maintained within bounds and can't drift significantly and the system has to be able to cope with clock mismatches up to 0.5%. For example, the sender may have a clock rate of 48.1kHz and the receiver may have a clock rate of 47.9kHz. Unfortunately the clock