similar to: Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

Michael Rock napsal(a): > all-generic-ide irqpoll > > Without irqpoll it just hangs and without > all-generic-ide it get a kernel panic. So I still > need both to recognize the disk and continue booting. > Michael, > I have tested 8.1.14 ICH9 x86_64 version and it's kring fine. For sure > im right now uploading full DVD isos. I did not want to :o( due due to >

> WELCOME TO MY WORLD :D > (Hey, are the new foobar packages done, how about the xwyz packages) > Thanks, > JOhnny Hughes When you snip the rest of my post man that last request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I saw the "uploading the new DVD's" a few days ago and thought I would ask. I really do not want to put anyone out and please do not go through any

I have 2 new boxes that I cannot use yet because of problems supporting these newer chipsets in 5.1. Does anyone know when the CD version of 5.0 x86-64 that has support for these chipsets be available on any on a Centos mirror? Has the support for these chipsets been added to yum yet? Here are my latest results with these chipsets and Centos 5.1 1. Asus P5K, E6850, P35 Chipset: Does not

btw - I installed your x86_64 rpms that has the ich9 patch directly on that box but it still will not boot without all the options. --- Michael Rock <mikerocks65 at yahoo.com> wrote: > > David wrote: > > Now there are right md5sums and even > > x86_64 iso.delta. > > David > > I tried using applydeltaiso and it creates a 2gb ISO > but I notice it fails on

David wrote: >I'll test DVD tomorrow. Today new kernel RPMS are > being built. What ptions are you talking about? > David all-generic-ide irqpoll Without irqpoll it just hangs and without all-generic-ide it get a kernel panic. So I still need both to recognize the disk and continue booting. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo!

Hi, full ICH9 support for Centos 5 can be found http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/pub/ Take it as a workaround until CentOS 5.1 is released. I hope ICH9 to be included in this version. Support is done by backporting from new kernel versions. Delta file is created with mkdeltaiso from CentOS-5.0-i386-bin-DVD.iso, so full image can be created with applydeltaiso. Regards, David Hrb??

Hi, Well, ICH9 support for CentOS as announced on Oct 16th by me http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088104.html has been extended. Today I have published x86_64 install DVD. You can find it here: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/pub/ich9/ Regards, David Hrb??

All, For anyone interested, there is an rpm in the CentOS testing repository for mod_gnutls for CentOS 5. It allows named based virtual hosting for HTTPS (Single IP, multiple sites and certificates). The idea to build the RPMS came from this article: http://www.g-loaded.eu/2007/08/10/ssl-enabled-name-based-apache-virtual-hosts-with-mod_gnutls/ Here is a guide for installing and using the new

Hi, RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built against Centos tree are available here: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/ Regards, David Hrb??

Hi, Those who are interested in anti Sloworis solution. I have built and packed mod_antiloris for C4/5. Packages are to be found at: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mod_antiloris.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/mod_antiloris.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mod_antiloris.html

Michael Rock napsal(a): > Hi Dave, > > I am using applydeltaiso with your delta and > CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso 4,186,786 bytes from one > of the Centos mirrors. But the block size is wrong and > does not match the image length. > > So I checked the md5 on your delta and it does not > match your md5.txt file. I downloaded it again to be > sure. > > Your

Hi all, I've the same problem, I've download the CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso from one centos mirror, i've applied deltaiso and the created image is 2 GB, the md5sum check of iso.delta (CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta) is ok, what's wrong ? deltaiso program exit on the same as Michael , maybe I've downloaded the worng DVD 64 bit iso version? do you know any good

> David wrote: > Now there are right md5sums and even > x86_64 iso.delta. > David I tried using applydeltaiso and it creates a 2gb ISO but I notice it fails on applying. kdnssd-avahi-devel.i386: copying unchanged payload kernel-xen.x86_64 (???): applying delta new payload open failed __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has

Is there a compiled mod_bandwidth rpm in CentOS or EPEL? I can't seem to find it, what name does it use if there is one? Basically all I need to do is find a way to severely throttle apache for testing an upload progress bar - my bandwidth on my lan is too fast, the progress bar either only gets one update or none by the time the files are uploaded (5 8 megapixel jpegs) - even when I use

Hi everybody, I want to build mod_gnutls. The problem: CentOS' version of GNUTLS is too old to link against, so I compiled and installed GNUTLS from source and put it into /opt where it doesn't hurt the already installed GNUTLS. Now I have trouble linking against this version as the autoconf buildchain in mod_gnutls does not find the newer version. I tried like this: ./configure

Hi! I am currently publishing some web services on a Centos 5.3 server on my office using the included apache httpd. They are available from the Internet, and they require validation (username/password). I would like to publish them all under https, so the passwords won't travel unencrypted, but then all my sites use the same certificate on apache httpd. The solution to this is using an

I want to add mod_security to my Apache server running CentOS 5.3 and am trying to find a repository to get it from. I found it in EPEL, but they have version 2.1.7, which is over a year old according to what I found on the modsecurity.org website. Is there a repository which is keeping this up to date? Or should I just build it from source? -- Bowie

Can this be done with stock centos 4? Or can this even be done with the extras repo? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore,

I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so I was about to install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and another in epel. epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that would suggest sticking with the extras version instead? Or even reasons other than the shiny version number on the epel one to

I need to be able to install CentOS 5.2 on a machine with software RAID (and LVM) setup. I discovered (the hard way!) that there is a bug in the mkinitrd package that causes it to enter an endless loop when there are /dev/mapper/ devices present during the install process. There is a patch to mkinitrd, which I applied and created a new rpm for mkinitrd with this patch applied. I'd like to