similar to: vorbis-tools segfault on aix 4.3

İsmai, Thanks for testing these. Can you please file a bug report (and CC me on it), and attach the full output of these failing tests? (When the test fails you should see the full command -- rerun it without piping the output into FileCheck). Thanks again, Hal ----- Original Message ----- > From: "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws> > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing

Hi, Its that time of the year again. Here is the results on openSUSE 13.1 PPC64. Total of 3 failures which seems to be due the same problem (the value in brackets is the time counter from the build system): [ 3468s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc32-vacopy.ll:21:10: error: expected string not found in input [ 3468s] ; CHECK: lwz [[REG3:[0-9]+]], {{.*}} [ 3468s]

Has anyone successfully gotten the VFS modules to work under AIX 5.3 and Samba 3.0.x ? I have no problem compiling Samba 3.0.x and having it working; but when I set up a VFS module the following occurs: 1. In the log file I see: [2005/11/09 15:45:02, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) =============================================================== [2005/11/09 15:45:02, 0]

Dear Sir, The following is the error log when I do the installation of Rsync = 2.5.6, please help to solve it. Thanks! Regards Eric Lin -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------- # pwd /archive/rsync-2.5.6 # ./configure configure: Configuring rsync 2.5.6 checking build system type... powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 checking

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:16:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:03:22PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:42:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > PPC Overlapping Group-B sets version 4 > > > > "" > > > > (*

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:16:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:03:22PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:42:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > PPC Overlapping Group-B sets version 4 > > > > "" > > > > (*

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:03:22PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:42:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > PPC Overlapping Group-B sets version 4 > > > "" > > > (* When the Group-B sets from two different barriers involve instructions in > > >

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:58:20AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:16:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:03:22PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:42:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > PPC

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:27:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:46:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:13:48AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > And the stuff we're confused about is how best to express the difference

On Tue, 4 May 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > I suspect that a large reason that LLVM does worst than a native C > > compiler with the CBE+GCC is that LLVM generates very low-level C code, > > and I'm not convinced that GCC is doing a very good job (ie, without > > syntactic loops). > > Yup, this is EXACTLY what is

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:27:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:46:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:13:48AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > And the stuff we're confused about is how best to express the difference > > > and guarantees of these two forms of transitivity and how exactly they >

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:27:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:46:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:13:48AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > And the stuff we're confused about is how best to express the difference > > > and guarantees of these two forms of transitivity and how exactly they >

I have determined why there are many "WARNING: Duplicate symbol:" messages. *** My apologies for the length *** There is a lot of detail - but I hope the detail will help R - and others - setup correct options for shared libraries. *** As I press send, I have not stopped testing (my final trial here might not even work) - but! *** the message is that shared libraries do not need to have

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:42:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:27:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:46:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:13:48AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > >

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:42:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:27:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:46:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:13:48AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > >

I have just downloaded the vorbis sdk for windows, for researching purposes. I have compiled the example 'encoder_example.c' just to start, and it compiles, but I got a error in the following line just at the beginning: vorbis_encode_init(&vi,2,44100, -1, 128000, -1); The error is more or less: The instruction at '0xaddresss' referenced memory at '0xaddress'. The

More information about the error below: I have downloaded the source and I got the same problem, but now I know in which exact line the error is. Inside the vorbisenc.c, we have the following function: tatic void codec_setup_partialcopy(codec_setup_info *ci, codec_setup_info *cs){ int i; memcpy(ci,cs,sizeof(codec_setup_info)); /* to get the flat numbers */ /* codebooks */

Host based authentication does not seem to be working for us after upgrading to openssh-3.4p1 (we were at openssh-3.1p1) (openssl is at 0.96d). Any time we try to connect from another unix box also running openssh-3.4p1, we get the following error (on the server side) and host based auth fails (it falls back to password prompt). sshd[15038]: error: ssh_rsa_verify: RSA_verify failed:

Hi everyone, I'm trying to use idmap_rid on an AIX 5.3 ML4 machine. Samba compiled successfully using the IBM compiler (vac.C) version 6. The only programs I supplied where db and libiconv. I followed the instructions, and put nsswitch/WINBIND in /usr/lib/security, and edited /usr/lib/security/methods.cfg. When I start "winbindd -i", it coredumps with a Signal 11: (dbx) where

My apologies if this is not the appropriate forum for this but I have posted twice to the ssh security list and have not received any replies. I would appreciated any help that anyone can offer. TIA ------- Ok, this is a repost from awhile back to which I received no replies. Originally, I was dealing with 3.4p1 but I am running into the same problem now with 3.5p1. I would greatly