similar to: PreBeta4/First Results

prebeta4 rpms (redhat 7.0 style (rpm 4.x)) up at www.vorbis.com/~jack/beta4 redhat 6.2 (rpm 3.x) version going up soon jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is

prebeta4 rpms (redhat 7.0 style (rpm 4.x)) up at www.vorbis.com/~jack/beta4 redhat 6.2 (rpm 3.x) version going up soon jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is

Once again I'm providing prebeta4 releases for people to test and playwith. Right now the tarballs are up. RPMS and the like should come soon.. http://www.vorbis.com/~jack/beta4/ jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing

Once again I'm providing prebeta4 releases for people to test and playwith. Right now the tarballs are up. RPMS and the like should come soon.. http://www.vorbis.com/~jack/beta4/ jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing

I can successfully compile the libogg prebeta4 tarball, but when I try to compile libvorbis I get make[2]: Entering directory `/home/me/dl/libvorbis-1.0prebeta4/lib' /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -O20 -ffast-math -mno-ieee-fp -D_REENTRANT -fsigned-char -DUSE_MEMORY_H -o libvorbis.la -rpath /usr/local/lib -version-info 0:1:1 mdct.lo smallft.lo block.lo envelope.lo window.lo lsp.lo

Hello developers, I recently participated in a public listening test that was held by German magazine c't. They had two categories, 64 kbps and 128 kbps. I only participated in the 64 kbps test where there were 7 .wav files, with 1 of them the original one and the other 6 being encoded with different encoders. Without knowing which file was encoded with which encoder you had to give each

Hiya, Find attached a new encoding mode. 100kbps. There's a patch as well; it is supposed to improve quality. Have fun, Segher p.s. To use the mode: add an #include "modes/mode_S.h" to modes/modes.h and force vorbisenc.c to use it. (Oh, and the S doesn't mean Segher. Really). <HR NOSHADE> <UL> <LI>application/octet-stream attachment: Unknown Document

My branch that I've been working on for the last few weeks is now the mainline; once I add a few more modes (mode_A.h through mode_E.h, corresponding roughly to 128,160,192,256,350 kbps stereo) and Mike Smith and Chad get the modes into OggEnc, we'll be at beta 2. A few things to note: I'd been really really hoping that I'd squeeze the last bit of performance out of non

Hiya, Just downloaded beta3, and I actually got it to compile without too much hassle. Great job! Still, some problems: -- (easy): the -V option to ogg123 is broken, --version works. -- make profile doesn't work (in vorbis-tools), need to pass in some -pg -static or something like it (doesn't exactly work, -static is swallowed by libtool; read some docs, needs to be -all-static

Hi. I''m newie using LARTC. I have some pc''s and one 512/192kbits conection. I do not want that one PC uses all the bandwidth available. I made this script to limit, but I need that the applications (web browsing, messenger with cam and audo , p2p, etc) in pc''s continue acceding normally Internet. Would work this script? what type of qdisc could be added to htb in

Hi, <p>apparently, I didn't delete my test samples ... I found them. :) Here's a small table of what nominal bitrate fits to which quality at what sample rate. Quality levels inbetween -1 and 0 are possible, but I didn't test them. Nominal bitrates of those quality settings will be somewhere between those of -1 and 0 and therefore can be guessed. q/channels || -1/mono |

2003-06-28 Bandwidth Study - John Todd (jtodd @loligo.com) Purpose: ------------- To obtain a better chart of actual bandwidth usage per codec as seen "on-the-wire" when using IAX2 trunking between two Asterisk telephony servers. Discussion: ------------- Past threads on the asterisk-dev and asterisk-users lists have indicated that the optimal way to save bandwidth on

On 10/19/2016 12:20 PM, Pan Xinhui wrote: > change from v3: > add x86 vcpu preempted check patch If you want you could add the s390 patch that I provided for your last version. I also gave my Acked-by for all previous patches. > change from v2: > no code change, fix typos, update some comments > change from v1: > a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted >

On 19/10/16 12:20, Pan Xinhui wrote: > change from v3: > add x86 vcpu preempted check patch > change from v2: > no code change, fix typos, update some comments > change from v1: > a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted > skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. > add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 04:11:16AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote: > change from v5: > spilt x86/kvm patch into guest/host part. > introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached. > fix some typos. > rebase patch onto 4.9.2 > change from v4: > spilt x86 kvm vcpu preempted check into two patches. > add documentation patch. > add x86 vcpu preempted check patch under xen > add

> to speex: *now here comes the more important part, can we build a c++ > component which does what avrelay does? is it practicable to de/encode > 100 streams with a c/c++ speex de/encoder in realtime?* COMMENTS WELCOME At low bit-rate (6-8 kbps) and lowest complexity, it's probably possible to encode 100 streams on a 3 GHz machine (and decoding is cheap), but that's all

B. Mitchell Loebel a ?crit : > Thank you. You're right ... my error ... I meant to say 12 bytes > (including the 2 bytes for VAD). And it is 10ms/frame. No matter ... > thank you for the SPEEX specs. In terms of quality, what SPEEX bit rate > compares with G.729 at 8kbps data rate please? Haven't done formal testing and it depends on whether it's G.729 or G.729A. I'd

Hello, congratulations to the Ogg Vorbis team - RC2 sounds good. But... RC2 in 128 kbps mode seems to clip off all frequencys beyond 16 KHz. On the tracks I tested Beta 4 gave response even beyond 18 KHz. Some testings on a randomly chosen track: (other tracks gave similar results) Artist: Judas Priest Album: Jugulator Title: Bullet Train Beta4: 127 kbps, ~ 18 KHz (!) RC2: 132 kbps (!), ~ 16

I halved the volume of the sample before encoding with `sox -v 0.5 floex.wav quiet.wav` and now I can't ABX it succesfully anymore. So the artifact I heard was just clipping when encoding or decoding. Opus remains unbeaten for me at 133 kbps. That's totally awesome. Cheers On 10 April 2017 at 17:14, Agustín Dall'Alba <agustin at dallalba.com.ar> wrote: > Hello! I found a

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:53:29 -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 03:03:28AM +0100, Andy Baxter wrote: > >> Is there any way to bring the bitrate in ices2 down below 32 kbps? > > Generally the trick for this is to downsample the audio before encoding. > You can ask ices to do this with a resample stanza in the config file: > > <resample>