similar to: References for the BARK/MEL stuff

Hi All, I need some clarifications regarding the mismatch I found in the code and the specification. (a) In the specification, the bark(x) equation is given as: bark(x) = 13.1 atan(.00074x) + 2.24 atan(.0000000158(x^2)) + .0001x whereas in the code it is given as: #define toBARK(n) (13.1f*atan(.00074f*(n))+2.24f*atan((n)*(n)*1.85e-8f)+1e-4f*(n)) Which one of these is the proper one ? (b)

Hi, In the course of some work which I describe below, I have found a very significant difference between the BARK function described in the Vorbis specification and its implementation in libvorbis. In the specificationhttp://xiph.org/vorbis/doc/Vorbis_I_spec.pdf bark(x) = 13.1arctan(.00074x) + 2.24arctan(.0000000185x**2 + .0001x) In the libvorbis code

I have a small feature request for oggenc: Can a command line option be added to allow the user to set the first serial number to be used for the output ogg stream? This only takes a few lines of code, actually. Rationale: it is quite helpful for debugging other encoders. If oggenc is the "reference" encoder, ensuring that your new whiz-bang encoder has diffable output to oggenc is a

Hi, It is better to replace this line in function filterbank_new: max_mel = toBARK(EXTRACT16(MULT16_16_Q15(QCONST16(.5f,15),sampling))); to max_mel = toBARK(EXTRACT16(sampling/2)); It gives the same but it seems to be faster and avoids overflow on 44100 kHz that prevents denoiser to process 44100 streams. (Yes I know that Speex should not pack 44100 streams but it does now and I use it). Best

Hi Jean-Marc, As I told you, bank is a reserved keyword in Analog Devices compiler for Blackfin architecture. So we need to change the variables named bank to something else. Here's a patch that changes bank to bnk in the 3 concerned files. (Hope the format is OK) About my previous problems with the Blackfin: -> strange block repetition that could be cancelled by the AEC I was busy

On 2024-09-05 4:23 p.m., Leo Mada via R-help wrote: > Dear R Users, > > Is this desired behaviour? > I presume it's a bug. > > atan(1i) > # 0+Infi > > tan(atan(1i)) > # 0+1i > > atan(1i) / 5 > # NaN+Infi There's no need to involve atan() and tan() in this: > (0+Inf*1i)/5 [1] NaN+Infi Why do you think this is a bug? Duncan Murdoch

Perhaps > Inf*1i [1] NaN+Infi clarifies why it is *not* a bug. (Boy, did that jog some long dusty math memories :-) ) -- Bert On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 2:48?PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 2024-09-05 4:23 p.m., Leo Mada via R-help wrote: > > Dear R Users, > > > > Is this desired behaviour? > > I presume it's a bug. > >

Dear R Users, Is this desired behaviour? I presume it's a bug. atan(1i) # 0+Infi tan(atan(1i)) # 0+1i atan(1i) / 5 # NaN+Infi There were some changes in handling of complex numbers. But it looks like a bug. Sincerely, Leonard [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I expect that atan(1i) = (0 + infinity i) and that atan(1i)/5 = (0 + infinity i)/5 = (0 + infinity i). Here's what I get in C: (0,1) = (0, 1) atan((0,1)) = (0, inf) atan((0,1))/5 = (0, inf) Note the difference between I*infinity = (0,1)*infinity = (0*infinity,1*infinity) = (NaN,infinity) and (0,infinity)/5 = (0/5,infinity/5) = (0,infinity). The former involves multiplying 0 by infinity, which

atan(1i) -> 0 + Inf i complex(1/5) -> 0.2 + 0i atan(1i) -> (0 + Inf i) * (0.2 + 0i) -> 0*0.2 + 0*0i + Inf i * 0.2 + Inf i * 0i infinity times zero is undefined -> 0 + 0i + Inf i + NaN * i^2 -> 0 + 0i + Inf i - NaN -> NaN + Inf i I am not sure how complex arithmetic could arrive at another answer. I advise against messing with infinities... use atan2() if you don't

Hi the following gave me a shock: > atan(2) [1] 1.107149 > atan(2+0i) [1] -0.4636476+0i > or, perhaps more of a gotcha: > atan(1.0001+0i) [1] -0.7853482+0i > atan(0.9999+0i) [1] 0.7853482+0i > evidently atan()'s branch cuts aren't where I thought they were. Where do I look for documentation on this? -- Robin Hankin Uncertainty Analyst National

> complex(real = 0, imaginary = Inf) [1] 0+Infi > Inf*1i [1] NaN+Infi >> complex(real = 0, imaginary = Inf)/5 [1] NaN+Infi See the Note in ?complex for the explanation, I think. Duncan can correct if I'm wrong. -- Bert On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:20?PM Leo Mada <leo.mada at syonic.eu> wrote: > Dear Bert, > > These behave like real divisions/multiplications: >

Dear R experts. 'D()' function recognizes some of the analitical functions, such as sin, cos, etc. But I'd like to take analytical derivatives from asin, atan etc. functions. Are there any R packages providing that features? Thanks. -- Timur.

Dear all, I try to plot a logstic regression model as follows: Valkror<- read.table("Valkror.txt", header=T) np.bark<- glm(Npinc~bark, family=binomial, data=Valkror) plot.formula(np.bark$fitted.values~ Valkror$bark) The above looks nice but I want to connect the points with a line so I try: plot.formula(np.bark$fitted.values~ Valkror$bark, type="b") but it gives a

Dear Bert, These behave like real divisions/multiplications: complex(re=Inf, im = Inf) * 5 # Inf+Infi complex(re=-Inf, im = Inf) * 5 # -Inf+Infi The real division / multiplication should be faster and also is well behaved. I was expecting R to do the real division/multiplication on a complex number. Which R actually does for these very particular cases; but not when only Im(x) is Inf.

Hi all. I'm trying to numerically invert the characteristic function of a quadratic form following Imhof's (1961, Biometrika 48) procedure. The parameters are: lambda=c(.6,.3,.1) h=c(2,2,2) sigma=c(0,0,0) q=3 I've implemented Imhof's procedure two ways that, for me, should give the same answer: #more legible integral1 = function(u) {

There''s got to be a simple answer: how do you get the IP address of a visitor in Ruby? Any help would be appreciated! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi there I'm trying to construct a model of mortality risk in 2D space that requires numerical integration of a hazard function, for which I'm using the integrate function. I'm occasionally encountering parameter combinations that cause integrate to terminate with error "Error in integrate... the integral is probably divergent", which I'm not sure how to interpret. The

Dear all, I stumbled over a problem recently when trying to use srt with text() on a windows device. What I intended to do was to plot a simple regression line, and to rotate a piece of text such that the text has the same angle as the regression line. However, the text is always plotted in a slightly wrong angle: #### x=1:10 #create arbitrary x and y values y=x*2-rnorm(1:10)

Hi ?atan2 says that atan2(y,x)=atan(y/x) for x and y numeric or complex vectors. Well, I would expect atan2(1,1i) to be equal to atan(-1i), but > atan2(1,1i) Error in atan2(y, x) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function > R.version _ platform powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0 arch powerpc os darwin8.5.0 system powerpc, darwin8.5.0