similar to: libao endian fix (attempt 2)

Ok, this patch replaces the old patch I sent, and it does a bit more. For one, it sorts the linked list of drivers based on the priority values, highest valued ones coming first. That allows the _find_default_driver_id code to stop looping (break) immediately when it finds a driver that works, because it already knows it's the working driver with the highest priority (what it normally

This patch fixes three problems with the current configure script: 1. Manual exclusion of drivers: Now you will be able to force drivers NOT to be compiled, even if they are detected. This was specifically requested with so that ALSA could be disabled. 2. Selecting the default device: Now you can override the default driver chosen by the script with your own preference. Again, this enhancement

remember kenneth that libao has moved to the "ao" module, so copy the changes... jack. ----- Forwarded message from "Kenneth C. Arnold" <kcarnold@xiph.org> ----- Delivered-To: cvs-outgoing@xiph.org Delivered-To: cvs@xiph.org To: cvs@xiph.org Subject: [xiph-cvs] cvs commit: vorbis/vorbis-tools/libao ao_alsa.c ao_oss.c audio_out.c audio_out.h Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000

Hi there. Sorry I may be a little off topics with this mail but I have already written to the official libao maintainer (volsung@xiph.org) and he is the one who suggest me to write here. As I did not see any more suitable mailing list @xiph.org here I am. My point is that I have recently written a win32 driver for the libao and I would be glad to see this contribution include to the official

Hi! There are some little inconvenience in libao-0.8.5. - The biggest is may that: the documentation and the header file declare the ao_file_extension function, which give a hint for the file extension where the device is realy a sound file. This function is missing. -An other: the alsa 0.5 and the alsa 0.9+ drivers short name. It will be better if the alsa 0.5's name will be alsa05 and the

Just so people know what I'm working on (between physics assignments), here's a quick list of what's currently in the pipeline: * I received an IRIX patch which I am very excited about. I'll be submitting that shortly. * A month ago another user sent me a very small patch that improved ALSA performance on his machine. I don't understand what it does exactly, and would

------- Forwarded Message Return-Path: owner-vorbis-dev@xiph.org Delivery-Date: Mon Jul 10 01:38:16 2000 Delivered-To: xiphmont@localhost.xiph.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bloopfish.xiph.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4A48882F for <xiphmont@localhost>; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 01:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: xiphmont@xiph.org Received: from xiph.org

I installed fink and now I have the /sw/lib, however that didn't fix my problem. I went as far as to take out the - Ddlsym=dlsym_auto_underscore out of the configuration files. Now however the libao package won't build at all and yips about this: [ukiel:/MP3/OGG/libao-0.8.6] wind% make Making all in src Making all in plugins Making all in oss make[3]: Nothing to be done for

I had a go at building libao-0.6.0 and it barfed on the alsa output part, complaining that snd_pcm_channel_status_t is undeclared - probably due to me running alsa 0.9.0 beta4. So the question is, should I try and beat the configure stuff into letting me disable alsa support and just use OSS, or would I be better off trying my luck with the nightly builds? And if so, can I get away with just

I had a go at building libao-0.6.0 and it barfed on the alsa output part, complaining that snd_pcm_channel_status_t is undeclared - probably due to me running alsa 0.9.0 beta4. So the question is, should I try and beat the configure stuff into letting me disable alsa support and just use OSS, or would I be better off trying my luck with the nightly builds? And if so, can I get away with just

Hello, I built the entire Vorbis kit on my PowerMac G4 running OSX 10.4.6. I'm having problems however doing anything with the libao package. Any time I try to use the library to link it errors out with the following message: /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols: _dlsym_auto_underscore collect2: ld returned 1 exit status If I try to run the ogg123 application I get this:

I just committed what will eventually become the next version of libao. I've made some major changes: renamed stuff, redesigned the API, actually documented things. It *will* break any current libao applications (like ogg123). It is on its own branch, so it shouldn't affect the mainline libao code for a while. But beware: I want to land this branch before Vorbis 1.0 goes out. Please

Here are some of my notes with building and using vorbis-tools-1.0beta4 under Debian Linux 2.2. 1) building libao: make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/jeremy/src/ogg/libao-0.6.0/src/plugins/alsa' Making all in arts make[3]: Entering directory `/home/jeremy/src/ogg/libao-0.6.0/src/plugins/arts' /bin/sh ../../../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DPACKAGE=\"libao\"

Xiph.Org announces the release of libao-1.0.0, libvorbis-1.3.1 and vorbis-tools-1.4.0. This is a coordinated update of the audio libraries and tools to deploy improved surround-sound support across the libraries and toolchain. libao improvements: - AO returned to active development - Added surround channel mapping API and capability - Updated all drivers on modern installs - New config file

Xiph.Org announces the release of libao-1.0.0, libvorbis-1.3.1 and vorbis-tools-1.4.0. This is a coordinated update of the audio libraries and tools to deploy improved surround-sound support across the libraries and toolchain. libao improvements: - AO returned to active development - Added surround channel mapping API and capability - Updated all drivers on modern installs - New config file

Hello Vorbis Developers. I'm in the proccess of writing an OggVorbis audio player using libao and libvorbisfile. I've greatly appreciated the simplicity of the API and good documentation with the souce of the libraries. I've descided that I really want a mixer on my player, and I'm unsure how to best go about it. LibAO (unless I'm absolutely blind) doesn't

Okay, before I submit my patch to make libao produce sorta-streamable wav files, I want to know what these partial wav files do to various players. I've posted two sample wav files on my webserver: http://volsung.dhcp.asu.edu/~stan/infinite.wav http://volsung.dhcp.asu.edu/~stan/zero.wav The first uses a riff and data length of 0xFFFFFFFF (approximately infinite) and second uses a riff and

Here is a patch to fix the compiler warnings I mentioned earlier. I've removed the byte-order changes that don't make sense. (Thanks Michael for pointing out the error!) As for the byte-order changes, since some output modules don't have the option to set the sample byte-order, I would like to standardize libao and ogg123 on native byte-order. Will this break the ao_wav.c patches

Hi All, For my new file (and thus mp3) server I've decided to switch completely to Ogg Vorbis. This means having to reencode ~30GB worth of 128Kb MP3's, but i figured that it would all be worth the effort. So I downloaded the sources for libogg, libvorbis and vorbis-tools and fired up my trusty old compiler. libogg and libvorbis built and installed like a charm. Not so for

In January I submitted a new "raw" output driver for libao that lets you write the audio samples directly to a file without any headers or anything else. It never got committed. Is it too late in the beta cycle to add it? I've been contacted by an author of a CD recording application whose problem could be solved by the inclusion of the raw driver. I need to make a change to the