similar to: question about encoding of lacing values

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I thought I would separate this out into a separate mail since it's not comment specific stuff -- There seem to be a couple of inconcistanies in the Ogg spec as regards to lacing values: *) "The raw packet is logicaly divided into [n] 255 byte segments and a last fractional segment of < 255 bytes." However, in the wild, I've

I noticed that, when decoding an ogg vorbis file that was encoded with the xiph library, that the comment header and setup header are encoded on one page. Okay, the vorbis documentation says you can do this, no problem. My question is, the lacing values seem to indicate where the packet boundaries for the two of these are, is this required, or is this just a hint? Further, I'm seeing

Hi all, Here are some thoughts on Vorbis framing, which may make it easier to stream Vorbis in real time. The suggested changes also move more audio data closer to the beginning of each page. A note in the Vorbis framing spec suggests a simple 'bandwidth limited' mode whereby important information is placed at the front of each page and the end of each page is discarded. When operating

Hi, I'm currently trying to implement the Ogg specification in pure Java from scratch. (I know, something like that does exist, but that's a rewrite from C, at least that's my impression). I'm a bit confused with the number of lacing values/segments in a page, and the maximum length a page can have. The specification says, that there can be 255 segments in a page, 255 bytes each

Someone could tell me the question about the question about lacing values values of segments. I mean i know what happens about segmentation but reading ogg specs i didn't understand this lines: "We simply add the lacing values for the total size; the last lacing value for a packet is always the value that is less than 255. Note that this encoding both avoids imposing a maximum packet

>Searching for 'vorbis' to find the packet boundary is wrong however. >The lacing values in the Ogg page header tells you exactly where the >division is. OK, so given the fact that a page can also contain multiple packets this means that the lacing values of one page could be like the following example: 255 255 189 (something less than 255, indicating that a new packet starts

Hey all, If my understanding is right, there's a serious big in vorbisfile.c, in the routine _fetch_headers(), which will only show up when comment packet spans multiple pages. The code to read the first 3 Vorbis packets ogg_stream_pagein() once, then calls ogg_stream_packetout(). The problem is that ogg_stream_pagein() only adds a single page to the ogg stream state, whereas

Ralph, thanks for your help. >>Since the length of the precedent identification header is fixed, this even is a fixed offset >>into the logical ogg stream. >This will work for all the vorbis-only files I've seen (because no one >pads the first packet). You should really implement a proper ogg parser, >but by all means get a hack working first. I will of course use the

Hi, Guys: Does anybody know is it allowed for the OGG segment including more than one Vorbis frame? Or should I consider about that? I am working on OGG+Vorbis player now, but met some cases that OGG segment includes some garbage bytes after one Vorbis frame, I want to know whether it's safe if I just drop the left bytes after decoding one Vorbis frame? I read the page

Hi Aaron, thanks for your thoughts on improving the Ogg encapsulation format. As Monty was the person who developed the specification, I am forwarding your suggestions to him. Maybe some of these changes can be adopted into a future version of the Ogg encapsulation format. Best Regards, Silvia. Aaron Williams wrote: > Hi Silvia, > > After reading the RFC on the ogg streaming

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:05 AM, ogg.k.ogg.k at googlemail.com wrote: > And that's the canonical way AFAIK. Comparing times computed from > the granpos you get from pages you get from a bsearch requires good > knowledge of the codec, whereas comparing granpos can seek within > any codec. No. it's in general impossible to calculate the granulepos that corresponds to a

Hi all, just letting you know that I am about to submit the final version of the Ogg 1.0 file format Internet-Draft to the IETF. It is due by today (March 3, Monday - Internet Draft final submission cut-off at 09:00 ET) for the next IETF meeting and I expect they will promote it to RFC status at the meeting. Please send any last-minute changes to me. Cheers, Silvia. <p><p>

Hi all, just letting you know that I am about to submit the final version of the Ogg 1.0 file format Internet-Draft to the IETF. It is due by today (March 3, Monday - Internet Draft final submission cut-off at 09:00 ET) for the next IETF meeting and I expect they will promote it to RFC status at the meeting. Please send any last-minute changes to me. Cheers, Silvia. <p><p>

Hi, On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 6:54 PM Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > FYI to everyone: If you have things that you would like to see done > before a merge of Flang, please reply with as many details as you have > time to provide (and if you have things that you would like to see done > soon, but you're comfortable with them happening after

David Flynn has proposed a new Ogg Dirac mapping. The draft is here: http://davidf.woaf.net/dirac-mapping-ogg.pdf This is a much bigger break from other codecs than my draft (at http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggDirac). We talked a bit about it on IRC today. Below is my summary; hopefully David can correct anything I got wrong or misleading. Comments? There are two main differences

Howdy, yeah, I've finally collected all your feedback on my I-D on the Ogg encapsulation format, many thanks to all of you! Below, I've listed the changes that I have made to the previous version and the attachment contains the complete new I-D. If there are any more change requests, please send me wording proposals as it's easier to include. :) Monty, in case you are doing any

Howdy, yeah, I've finally collected all your feedback on my I-D on the Ogg encapsulation format, many thanks to all of you! Below, I've listed the changes that I have made to the previous version and the attachment contains the complete new I-D. If there are any more change requests, please send me wording proposals as it's easier to include. :) Monty, in case you are doing any

> I'm the developer of manjaroiso, the tool we use to build our install > medias for Manjaro Linux. > During our testings we found out, that syslinux6 won't work on older > hardware. I've a new Lenovo i7 notebook which booted up our images > just fine. Even with syslinux6. On my other PCs I got similar error > messages as Carl got. (snip) > > In

Has anyone been able to get the Lace (ajax chatroom) ported over to Ruby for a Ruby on Rails implemention? (The current version is PHP-based) ... or is there a ROR-chatroom distribution that exists? Thanks! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I am attempting to migrate a Slackware server with Samba 4.12.3 from an NT style domain to AD. I have done this about 7-8 times on other servers in the past following the instructions on Samba's wiki. This time however, the upgrade process is failing completely to import any users or groups from the NT domain. I have enclosed below the output of the classicupgrade command - I can't