similar to: Sisvel's claim on MP3

Attn: JJ Liu I refer to your message on sisvel and would like to get some more info. Do you mean if you want to buy a MP3 player and that it does not have the MP3 Sisvel licence, you will not be able to load and listen to MP3 music? MP3 & 4 manufacturers charge extra for the Sisvel licence - If you order the products without the licence, does it mean that the products will still play

Lee Gold <leegold at operamail.com> writes: > Ubuntu Server 12.04, Nut installed with sudo apt-get install nut > ... > Tried this and got error message: > Can't claim USB device [0764:0501]: could not detach kernel driver from > interface 0: Operation not permitted Did you reboot after installing the nut package? Just a couple days ago I connected up a USB UPS to a Red

The reboot worked. Thank You! Now I get: $ sudo upsdrvctl start [sudo] password for wsadmin: Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.6.3 Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.35 (2.6.3) USB communication driver 0.31 Can't chdir to /var/run/nut: No such file or directory Driver failed to start (exit status=1) I'm going to do: mkdir /var/run/nut chown root:nut /var/run/nut chmod

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34 provos at citi.umich.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From provos at citi.umich.edu

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34 mouring at eviladmin.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org

Thank you Eyal!! Adding usbhid.quirks=0x0463:0xffff:0x08 to the kernel boot parameters did the trick for me. FYI to those using Fedora 32, to edit the command line use the tool "grubby" as follows: grubby --update-kernel=ALL --args="usbhid.quirks=0x0463:0xffff:0x08" @DEVS: Could you please re-add the code for using this UPS? It's still being sold fast and furious in

Doesn't it mean you have to remember changing copyright in 2019? -- Mykola Ivanets ср, 22 серп. 2018, 08:58 користувач Bernhard M. Wiedemann < bwiedemann@suse.de> пише: > This change helps to make libguestfs package build reproducible. > See https://reproducible-builds.org/ for why this is good. > > Without this patch, building today's libguestfs in 2033, claims >

Thanks for explanation. -- Mykola Ivanets ср, 22 серп. 2018, 22:23 користувач Bernhard M. Wiedemann < bwiedemann@suse.de> пише: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2018-08-22 06:11, Nikolay Ivanets wrote: > > Doesn't it mean you have to remember changing copyright in 2019? > > s/have to/can/ > > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2018-08-22 06:11, Nikolay Ivanets wrote: > Doesn't it mean you have to remember changing copyright in 2019? s/have to/can/ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2390230/do-copyright-dates-need-to-be-updated In many jurisdictions, expiry of copyright is 50-70 years after death of the author and that point in time does not depend on when a

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:37:56PM +0530, Fuzail Ahmad wrote: > Problem Statement: > > Libvirt failed to claim Virtual Functions on hostdev network after VM > reboot. > > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > > libvirtd (libvirt) 2.0.0 I'd just like to point out that 2.0.0 is very old libvirt, even debian 9 has 3.0.n, can you verify

On 10/02/2023 10:01, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 10.02.23 um 10:34 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >>> I asked the windows admin and told him that I don't get correct >>> replies when doing "dig @DC1 ..." on samba. No reply yet from him. >> >> He is probably rushing around trying to find out what is up with his >> DC ;-)

Am 13.02.23 um 14:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On 13/02/2023 13:04, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > >> I am a bit confused right now (maybe always): you told me >> "Administrator shouldn't own anything on Unix" > > From the Unix end, you should never find Administrator owning anything. > This is because, as my example

Am 10.02.23 um 10:09 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> one of the 3 DCs does not reply to my DNS-queries > > You need to fix that, perhaps (if possible) restart the computer. You mean: the samba server? >> edited resolv.conf to point to the other 2 DCs now >> >> Did a killall -HUP smbd ... didn't change the yellow warning so far. >> >> Maybe that

On 10/02/2023 09:03, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 10.02.23 um 09:57 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: >> Am 10.02.23 um 09:10 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> >>> If that isn't it, try looking at dns, with things like this, it is >>> usually dns. >> >> hmm >> >> the DC uses its own IP and the other 2 DCs as DNS

On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 07:50 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Their external windows admin tries to edit ACLs etc by accessing > them > > from their DC, a Windows 2016 server. > > > > And in editing Security Settings he gets something like > > > > no connection to AD to access or check claim types > > > > (I translated this

It should be possible to make this be 16 on nvc0. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Not touching nv50 since I have a patch that actually impelents support for multiple viewports there. src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_screen.c | 2 ++ src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_screen.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git

This could be a nice opportunity for users with a high volume of SIP traffic terminating in the US: Collecting dip fees on outbound phone calls - fees that would otherwise go to the local phone company. With all the recent fees and surcharges, the cost of wholesale telecom and dialer traffic keeps rising. But what many companies with a high volume of IP based voice traffic don't realize

On 13/02/2023 13:04, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > I am a bit confused right now (maybe always): you told me "Administrator > shouldn't own anything on Unix" From the Unix end, you should never find Administrator owning anything. This is because, as my example showed. as a Unix use, Administrator is just a normal, unprivileged user e.g. my example Unix

Am 10.02.23 um 11:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > Hmm, so there is a DC that is having some dns problems and the windows > admin isn't bothered that this 'may' be replicating to his other DC's ???? seems so I don't know if he would take that one DC down if I recommend that to him > Yes, good to keep up to date, but like you, I don't think updating will

Am 13.02.23 um 12:14 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> # ls -n >> insgesamt 24 >> drwxrwxr-x+ 4 0 10512 4096? 9. Dez 20:43 Test1 >> drwxrwxr-x+ 2 0 10512 4096? 9. Dez 20:41 test2 >> drwxrwxr-x+ 2 0 10512 4096? 9. Dez 20:41 test3 >> >> gid 10512 should be "domain admins" or in this case german >> "dom?nen-admins" with an ugly