similar to: AACplus

On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:56:06PM -0500, Jay Krivanek wrote: > Yea, don't get me wrong, ogg is definitely an awesome format but aacplus v2 > is currently the leader in high fidelity quality at low bitrates. 24kbps > aacplus even kicks ass in my view. Is that 24kbps AACPLUS a full 44.1kHz stereo signal with frequencies preserved up to at least 15kHz? (Just curious, not

I'm am currently using autuvb4 at q-2 mono 44100. This produces roughly 28 to 34kb/s. It's ok but I've heard AACPlus at 32kb/s stereo and it's definately better, unfortunately. Regards, Ross. >> I'm hoping that Monty and others can improve Vorbis to start >> competing >> with AAC+ at low bitrates. Monty said he had some ideas but I wonder >> if

Hello. I have same problem, and I think that it's because AAC+ uses VBR and when it's changes, is not the same bitrate, because varies... El jue., 9 may. 2019 a las 21:29, Michel van Dop (<mvandop at xs4all.nl>) escribió: > Hi Paul, > > Thank you for the information. I already try a player to discover the > stream type of both streams if the are the same. > But i can

Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits has stopped providing licenses for MP3 technology, "[...] noting that more superior audio formats have rendered the MP3 obsolete. Speaking to National Public Radio (USA), the Fraunhofer Institute said AAC has since become the 'de facto standard for music download and videos on mobile phones.' "

OK, I've organized this. It's not possible to average 32kb/s stereo with Vorbis using VBR. Quality -2 stereo proeduces roughly 32 to 38kb/s which is too high for many modems. I would have to use ABR, but last I tried that, it utilized too much CPU for my 950Mhz PC, and oddcast doesn't appear to support that option anymore. I've tried AACPlus 32kb/s mono and there is very

Hi, Up until now, I've been providing narrowband streams at 24kbps MP3. We've reluctantly been using MP3 instead of say Ogg Vorbis due to wider support. But it's getting to the point where low bitrate MP3 doesn't really cut it anymore. With technologies like AACPlus out there in common usage, people have come to expect better and one can hardly blame them. So I thought

> hmmm.. very interesting.. any info on how they've done the licensing ? No idea how the licensing works. If it's free for the streamer then that may destroy Vorbis's inroads into streaming. I'm hoping that Monty and others can improve Vorbis to start competing with AAC+ at low bitrates. Monty said he had some ideas but I wonder if anything is being worked on presently.

I should have provided a link to my low bitrate vorbis stream. It's a mostly easy listening world music format: http://soulfm.stationplaylist.com/listen.m3u Regards, Ross.

A FREE AAC/aacPlus Plugin for Microsoft Windows Media Player that fully supports the Icecast2 Server is available for download here: http://www.orban.com/plugin FYI: This plugin supports .asx for Windows Media Player NOT .pls or .m3u. Also streams can be opened directly by using newly created UIL redirectors, e.g., icyx:// instead of http:// and rtpx:// instead of rtsp://. This is all covered

Soon, Firefox 3.1 and other browsers will start to support vorbis and users will increase vorbis use on the net. Most users (as most Linux distributions) are however using the reference xiph.org vorbis library which generate worse files than the aoTuV library from http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ . According to latest discussion: https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1251 the aoTuV code should have

Ok, I read the Read Me. So icyx://boa.mediacast1.com:9292/stream.aac works. I don't understand why the http syntax cannot be made to work. This works fine for Ogg Vorbis streams using the Illumination DirectShow filter. Ross. ====================================== StationPlaylist.com http://www.stationplaylist.com Low-cost music scheduling, live assist & automation software for radio

Hello- You guys have done an excellent job with the Icecast2 server. I probably don't need to tell you that, but I did anyway. We are Coding Technologies licensees and have recently developed a streaming audio encoder supporting AAC/HE-AAC/aacPlus using RTSP/RTP, SHOUTcast HTTP/ICY, and Icecast2 HTTP/ICY, Orban Opticodec-PC. More information here:

Just so you know the what's happening with the competition, Nullsoft has released Shoutcast DSP v1.90 supporting AACPlus encoding for free. http://www.shoutcast.com/downloads/shoutcast-dsp-1-9-0-windows.exe The shoutcast website hasn't been updated yet. You need Winamp v5.1 which includes the AAC+ encoder DLL. Regards, Ross.

Hi Ross, I Agree with your statement. I think the problem is with bringing the quality to the same level, that the principal might be registered. Although sometime back on this list sombody (Hans-Jurgen?) mentioned that it would be possible to implement AACplus in oddcast because oddcast is free. Now if that is true, technically it would be possible to use the same technics (SBR and PS)

Yes it is 44.1kHz. However SBR is not the original, everything higher then 22.05kHz is recreated. Also Parametric Stereo recreates the Stereo experience. The actual audio data is simply a 24kbps AAC stream at 22050 mono. Also it is by no means perfect. The highs do have an artificial feel to them and a little echo. For what it is though most people don't really get annoyed by it and are

On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 01:59:05PM +0200, Michel van Dop wrote: > [2019-05-07 13:33:29] WARN format/format_get_type Unsupported or legacy > stream type: "audio/aacp". Falling back to generic minimal handler for best > effort. Is one source AAC-LC (standard AAC) and the other HE-AAC v2 (AAC+)? There are three variants of AAC: AAC-LC HE-AAC (= AAC-LC with SBR) HE-AAC v2 (=

First: I am not a lawyer, this is no legal advice! On 16 May 2017, at 0:25, Robert Jeffares wrote: > Jack, > > I am using AAC+ encoded by Darkice and distributed on Icecast2 on a > Ubuntu server. I had to install a number of open source libraries and > compile darkice from source. No licence. This sounds like it would violate the license, given that the FAQ on

> This is not sad. > Science marches on... The project was never about science, but about freedom. jack.

it seems that icecast 2.2 can only stream aac at 128kbps! mp3 and ogg are ok at all bitrates. is it a bug or my config wrong? --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs. Learn more. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Trying to get the LE version for months now, still treamguys can?t deliver.... Regards, Dennis Heerema -----Original Message----- From: "Greg J. Ogonowski" <greg@orban.com> To: qiang Bao <jakobao@yahoo.com>, icecast@xiph.org Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 11:08:04 -0800 Subject: Re: [Icecast] icecast2.2 and aac? Icecast 2.2 works fine with AAC/aacPlus at any bitrate. 32kbps