similar to: Extension proposal - partly serious

>Paul E Wrote [snip] >Windows 2000 (although it's the same for all of them) doesn't read in >any mime-type to correctly identify a file, it just uses the extension. [snip] What if, at least for Windows, someone wrote a simple application which when associated with .ogg files and an .ogg file was opened simply read enough of the ogg stream to identify the type of content and then

I don''t know if this has been suggested before but.. What about adding support for a bookmark or hyperlinked index? The idea is that a large compilation such as a long speech or an album would be maintained as a single file, but on playback, the player would show numerous ''tracks'' which are really just bookmarks relating to starting position of the specific part or

Theora and Vorbis both uses same extension .ogg. I know ogg is a container, just like avi. But in my opinion video and audio files should have different extensions (using .ogv can be a nice idea). To a media player it doesn't matter what extension a file uses, but to a human who does a ls in a directory full of media files having different extensions will help a lot. I know one can use file

Sorry, but I think generic extension names are far from perfect. Here are some additional problems to consider: 1) Language. When people talk about file types, they almost never say "dot" at the beginning. They say "MP3 files". For example, "Does that player support MP3 files?" If you have an extension of ".music" this ends up being "Does that

Sorry, but I think generic extension names are far from perfect. Here are some additional problems to consider: 1) Language. When people talk about file types, they almost never say "dot" at the beginning. They say "MP3 files". For example, "Does that player support MP3 files?" If you have an extension of ".music" this ends up being "Does that

Sorry, but I think generic extension names are far from perfect. Here are some additional problems to consider: 1) Language. When people talk about file types, they almost never say "dot" at the beginning. They say "MP3 files". For example, "Does that player support MP3 files?" If you have an extension of ".music" this ends up being "Does that

Sorry, but I think generic extension names are far from perfect. Here are some additional problems to consider: 1) Language. When people talk about file types, they almost never say "dot" at the beginning. They say "MP3 files". For example, "Does that player support MP3 files?" If you have an extension of ".music" this ends up being "Does that

Sorry, but I think generic extension names are far from perfect. Here are some additional problems to consider: 1) Language. When people talk about file types, they almost never say "dot" at the beginning. They say "MP3 files". For example, "Does that player support MP3 files?" If you have an extension of ".music" this ends up being "Does that

Is there any particular reason why ov_read() packs floats to integer PCM inline, rather than being implemented in terms of ov_read_float() and a separate packing fucntion? There are obviously many advantages doing audio manipulation on the floats before packing, but right now you have to reinvent the packing stage yourself - in a replaygain backend that I'm working on, I ended up copying

Hi, I have downloaded Vorbis and played with it, and I have downloaded Speex but not yet played with it. My understanding is that Vorbis is targetted at high-quality audio (music) while Speex is targetted at speech quality audio (telephoney and such). So I have two questions to ask the group: 1. Which would your experiences show is the better codec for recording high quality speech such

----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Malone" <ibmalone@gmail.com> To: <ogg-dev@xiph.org> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 8:42 AM Subject: Re: [ogg-dev] oggfile, skeleton and vorbis tools > Re-reading Monty's email: when you talk about vorbis-only vorbisfile and > the concurrent vorbis stream case do you mean vorbisfile will need to be > able to choose?

(w. quotes from the xiphmeet: <http://westfish.xiph.org/~giles/200603_meeting.txt>, I've tried to strip it down to relevant stuff) <xiphmont> "Is there any interest in extending vcedit/libvorbisfile to do basic handling of Vorbis streams from concurrently multiplexed Ogg?" < xiphmont> Yes, but that work was *also* tied to OggFile from way back when, and one

Hi, I need to adjust the output volume from ogg123 the same way that mpg123 has the "-f n change scalefactor [32768]" option. I need to do this within ogg123, instead of alternatives that involve pipes, such as piping the output to sox. I do not believe that this is currently possible in ogg123, and I'm looking for some suggestions as to how it can be accomplished by modifying

Hi, I need to adjust the output volume from ogg123 the same way that mpg123 has the "-f n change scalefactor [32768]" option. I need to do this within ogg123, instead of alternatives that involve pipes, such as piping the output to sox. I do not believe that this is currently possible in ogg123, and I'm looking for some suggestions as to how it can be accomplished by modifying

----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Malone" <ibmalone@gmail.com> To: "ogg-dev" <ogg-dev@xiph.org> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:24 PM Subject: Re: [ogg-dev] oggfile, skeleton and vorbis tools >> This is something we might want to extend skeleton to support, i know >> we've talked about this kind of thing before. So that skeleton can

Hi list, I have been trying to get the new file extension for Ogg FLAC (.oga) to work with Amarok. But it does not look to be possible due to limitations in the xine and gstreamer engines. Maybe the move to .oga was prematurely? I have done some testing with other players?including Banshee, Quod Libet, and others?but have not had any success with playing the .oga files. Only player I have

Anyone know how I can persuade a debian system that a version number like '1.0-1' is actually greater than '1.0rc3-1', for the purpose of dependencies? As the 1.0 debian control file requires debhelper 4.0.0, I ended up building from source, but I'd like to put some equivs packages in without silly version numbers like '1.0rc99' to keep apt and friends happy. John

On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:10:57PM -0500, Monty wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:36:38PM +0000, Ian Malone wrote: > > I assume what this all means is there's no desire for any kind of stop- > > gap libvorbisfile that does the "vorbis out of any otherwise valid Ogg > > stream"[1], and that anything along these lines will wait until Oggfile. > > Well,

Hello: As seen in some of the MP3-oriented P2P programs and audio organizing tools, the underlying uniqueness of a given mp3 file can be learned (for the most part) by, for instance, taking a hash of the first 300,000 bytes of the non-id3 tag content of an mp3 file to obtain a content signature (This hash could then further be paired with the length of the non tag portion of the entire file for

on http://www.navratil.cz/SFD2010/ , but Google Chrome and Opera are working fine. Is my HTML5 page correct? Or what I shall change to make it working in Firefox too, please? Thank you, Jiri -- Jiri Navratil, http://www.navratil.cz, +420 777 224 245 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: