similar to: Desirable Properties of a Real Metadata Format

The software page's only currently maintained Ogg Vorbis player for Mac-people is the iTunes plugin that seems to be for OS X only. Is there no player for Mac OS 8 or 9? <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word

Does anyone know how to execute the following sort problem in R? Matrix X has positive integer entries, and each column has been sorted in ascending order. The problem is now to order the columns lexicographically. For instance if the matrix X is 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 5 5 4 2 then the result should be 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 4 5 2 5 Let ONE be a vector of 1's of length

Hi everybody: Here is this week's Ogg Traffic. The HTML version is available at http://www.vorbis.com/ot/20030324.html Enjoy! <p>Ogg Traffic for Monday, March 24, 2003 [1]Carsten "Purple" Haese March 24, 2003 _________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1. Status Updates 1.1. Monty 1.2. Stan Seibert

Hi there! I need some assistance here with vector orderings. I have a set of q vectors of length p, grouped by rows in a matrix A, q?p, that I need to order lexicographically (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexicographical_order). I also have another matrix B, p?r, and a vector c, that should be ordered according to the order of A. So far, I was doing ordering <-

Is there any built-in way to lexicographically compare two vectors of the same length in R? The textbook algorithm could be coded as follows: lex.cmp <- function (vec1,vec2) { for (j in 1:length(vec1)) { if (vec1[j] < vec2[j]) { return(-1) } if (vec1[j] > vec2[j]) { return(1) } } return(0) } Thanks, Gabriel

I have the following xyplot figure: http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/686/filesizeresults12000000.png The data are organized in a matrix file as follows: Type Elements Chromosome Time bedGz 12000000 chr1 14.240 bedGz 12000000 chr2 7.949 bedGz 12000000 chr3 5.103 bedGz 12000000 chr4 5.290 bedGz 12000000 chr5 5.161 ... The x-axis labels in the Chromosome column are ordered

Hi, I'm getting a "random" build failure related to AArch64 when building with cmake. The build is running with -j32 so it seems that there is some dependency issue that causes the build to fail when things build in a certain order. Is anyone else seeing this problem? paul 3008 make[2]: *** No rule to make target `lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64GenDAGISel.inc', needed by

Hi! I have found and (tentatively) fixed a bug in the Win32 version of speexdec. Is this the place to post it, or... ? Sincerely Anders S. Johansen --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in

System: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago) I?ve installed zlib 1.2.11 on the home folder of a Red Hat HPC as part of the process for installing R base 3.4.0. I get this error even after successful install of zlib checking for inflateInit2_ in -lz... no checking whether zlib support suffices... configure: error: zlib library and headers are required I?ve checked R

Hi, The rows of a data frame can be sorted lexicographically as shown in this example, my.df <- data.frame(x=c(1,1,1,2,2), y=c(1,2,3,2,1)) my.df[order(my.df$x,my.df$y, decreasing=TRUE), ] however, I'm wondering if it's possible to pass a variable in as the first argument to order() so that the actual set of columns used in the sort can be easily varied? FWIW, the first argument to

Hi I'm trying to unzip the source code for the Speex Encoder, but I'm not having much success. I've tried using WinZip (unregistered version 8.0) and PowerArchive (version 6.1). Neither of them open the files "speex-1.0rc2.tar.gz" or "refman.tar.gz". What am I doing wrong? Many thanks Jim --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg

Hello All, Okay i think I''m finally getting all of what i want out of ferret working, thanks mostly to reading this forum and also getting ALOT of questions answered, thanks alot everyone. Anyway my last ferret task is too get the results sorted by a field called date_registered and have this working with pagination. here is what i''m doing at the moment:

Hi Paul, > I'm getting a "random" build failure related to AArch64 when building with cmake. > The build is running with -j32 so it seems that there is some dependency issue > that causes the build to fail when things build in a certain order. > 3008 make[2]: *** No rule to make target `lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64GenDAGISel.inc', needed by Hmm. That file's

1) A table of contents is in "LIST." 2) The tree has had some simplification. 3) 2 directories have been added: "wget" and "Windows." These are put in to help in downloading. Corrections to false assertions and other mistakes would be greatly appreciated, as well as simplifications and improvements. ..........Al --- >8 ---- List archives:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9594 Summary: Error transferring user and non-user xattr using --fake-super under Linux Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hi, I understand the idea behind compare_numeric() is to compare strings containing digits in a special way: Do a normal string-compare up to the point where both string elemnts are numerical. Find then an outcome based on the number of consecutive digits in the strings while disregarding the value of the digits, eg a12b < a123. I guess then this order should hold: a12 == a22 < a1b, for

Hello, Everybody: This may not be a "bug", but for me it is an unexpected outcome. A factor variable's levels do not retain their ordering after the levels function is used. I supply an example in which a factor with values "BC" "AD" (in that order) is unintentionally re-alphabetized by the levels function. To me, this is very bad behavior. Would you agree? #

Hello, I have the following data1 (index are chars): ?? ?index 1 ?008823 2 ?012689 3 ?004503 4 ?002991 5 ?012689 6 ?002845 7 ?012689 8 ?012395 9 ?012689 10 009302 11 002845 12 006669 13 008823 14 009302 15 025340 16 012689 and data2 in this format (index2 are chars): ?? ? ? index2 ? ? ?tic 1 ? ? 001003 ? ? ANTQ 2 ? ? 001004 ? ? AIR 3 ? ? 001009 ? ? ABSI 4 ? ? 001011 ? ? ACSE etc I am

Thought this might be useful to at least consider being included in 1.0.1. It adds, among other things (maybe), an endian variant of AIFF-C. Nathan -------------- next part -------------- diff -urN vorbis-tools-1.0.orig/oggenc/audio.c vorbis-tools-1.0/oggenc/audio.c --- vorbis-tools-1.0.orig/oggenc/audio.c Thu Jul 11 16:20:33 2002 +++ vorbis-tools-1.0/oggenc/audio.c Mon Jan 20 09:42:57 2003 @@

Hi Andy, Thanks very much for looking into the problem. In this particular test case, it seems most of the time is spent in the sorting, not the grouping. Later, I realized that it seems in this test case most of the expressions to be compared have different length. I tried the following change in compare() when the LHS and RHS's types are the same: