similar to: Pontis and vorbis change.

Here's a list of non-PC hardware I found that supports Vorbis, with links and short descriptions. It's still kind of rough, and I don't have personal experience with any of these things, though where noted, I have gotten email from the company. This is still just a draft. I've made links, and also left the URLs after the headings so it converts to text well. Following the

I like the vorbis.com site, and it was my first contact with Vorbis. Hardware support has never been hugely important to me, but the perceived lack of hardware support keeps many people from using Vorbis. I think there should be a list of Vorbis-supporting hardware right on vorbis.com. There are already a few non-PC devices that can play Vorbis (DP-450 DVD player, Zaurus, Palm), as well as

Hi R Helpers, I recently tried to take advantage of the ability to download all the tickers in the S&P 500 using the functionality of tidyquant, but it threw an error. For summary, the set of commands that I ran was library(tidyquant) tq_index_options() tq_index("SP500") sessionInfo() R feedback including error message and sessionInfo are provided below. Guidance would be

I''m planning to build a new server for my home network and was thinking of running vmware server on it. I would then have one virtual machine with Solaris and one or two other virtual machines with other systems on them. The Solaris machine would be used for storage using zfs. My question now is if anyone has tried to dedicate physical disks in vmware to a solaris guest and then used

Hello list members, I am running NUT 2.0.1 on an OpenBSD 3.8 system, using the OpenBSD port for net-snmp-5.1.2p2. The UPS is connected via an AP9606 Web/SNMP card with current firmware, and the LAN. All goes well for a long time, usually more than one month. Then the system starts spitting messages about losing communications with the UPS. A second message about reconnecting follows immediately.

On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: > FYI > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1 For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the former is really important), but for the rest, especially those with image/sound processing, and HMMR, it's still far behind. Is this only

On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote: > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php? > page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1 Unfortunately, they don't specify what flags are used, what architecture is compiled for etc. It's entirely possible that they are accidentally compiling the llvm-gcc binaries for x86-32 and the gcc ones for x86-64 for example. If

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Stefano Delli Ponti < stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know what you think about this, but shouldn't it be more > meaningful to make these tests with -O3? I mean, we ought to make the > comparisons with the highest level of optimization available for both of > the compilers. It is difficult to compare an intermediate

On Sep 16, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote: > Chris Lattner: >> Comparing -O3 (and even -O4) is interesting, but we want all >> optimization levels to perform better than GCC :). Lots of people >> use -O2 and -Os, so comparing against other compiler's -O2 and -Os >> levels is just as interesting as comparing -O3 vs -O3. > > My thinking

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:37:53AM +0100, Renato Golin wrote: > On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti > <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: > > FYI > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1 > > For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the > former is really important), but for the rest,

screw that site, its useless info run by a linux gnu zealot. 2009/9/14 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>: > On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote: > >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php? >> page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1 > > Unfortunately, they don't specify what flags are used, what > architecture is compiled for etc.

On Sep 16, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote: > Olivier Meurant: >> I have run the john the ripper test. >> I have used the official archive (same version as phoronix) from >> http://www.openwall.com/john/g/john-1.7.3.1.tar.bz2 >> >> To build with llvm-gcc, replace the line CC = gcc with CC = llvm-gcc. >> I have used the following command to build

On 27.04.2010, at 12:37, Renato Golin wrote: > On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti > <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: >> FYI >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1 > > For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the > former is really important), but for the rest, especially those

>>I realize that I may have unintentionally been misleading you by leaving some information out. That error report from ogginfo keeps going, repeating the same 3 errors (as above) over and over again. It ends after a stream_truncated=true, not giving a final header_integrity=fail. (Perhaps because there's not another packet?) Then it reports a total playtime of 0. > >Yes,

Since we are in the area, what *should* O1 do? It's basically good for nothing, since it doesn't tune for size or performance. The only good I personally ever have for it is once in a while there is a miscompile at -O1 which narrows the problem. Would it be crazy to make -O1 equivalent to -Os? - Daniel On Wednesday, September 16, 2009, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>

FYI http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1

Olivier Meurant: > I have run the john the ripper test. > I have used the official archive (same version as phoronix) from > http://www.openwall.com/john/g/john-1.7.3.1.tar.bz2 > > To build with llvm-gcc, replace the line CC = gcc with CC = llvm-gcc. > I have used the following command to build : make clean linux-x86-sse2 > (seems to be the best on x86-32) > The makefile

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1 Regards, Stefano

Chris Lattner: > Comparing -O3 (and even -O4) is interesting, but we want all > optimization levels to perform better than GCC :). Lots of people use > -O2 and -Os, so comparing against other compiler's -O2 and -Os levels > is just as interesting as comparing -O3 vs -O3. > My thinking was that, for instance, -02 for GCC and -02 for LLVM(-GCC) do not necessarily mean

Hi I''m having the following problem and tried already several workarounds, as well benp- tried to help me on irc. I copied the ntp modul from DavidS repo and adapted it in the Service part to run as well under openbsd. Which was just adding some binary if openbsd is the operatingsystem. However then I wanted to run it as well on a gentoo system (on centos, debian and openbsd it was