similar to: AW: AW: AW: Why the commotion about file extensions?

> Good point. File extensions normally represent groups of related > formats. I don't propose differentiating everything (e.g. standalone > FLAC from Ogg FLAC). I do want as a minimum to tell apart these > categories: > > - Lossy audio: Vorbis, Speex. But speech is useful to distinguish > from music, so making Speex separate is not a bad idea. > - Lossless audio:

> All true. But note what the user wants according to these definition: > he wants different icons for audio vs. video. Yes, he doesn't know > the difference between `.mp3` and `.ogg`. But that's precisely why > windows hides the extensions from him by default. If he does know, he > would have disabled this hiding. Exactly. The main reason for different extensions from

Well, I only recently subscribed to this mailing list and do not know all the history of this extension debate (I passed up on reading the hundreds of messages that seem to have been written about this topic). I just wanted to make one quick point: from my experience, the average user does not know about file formats, only about content (my experience stems from working for ashampoo

Hello everyone, I recently stumbled upon an issue in the encoder of the v1.0 SDK. At the end of each encoding session a divide by zero (D=0) happens in bark_noise_hybridmp (psy.c:642). This causes a crash on Win9x systems (WinNT seems to handle this fine by using infinite as the result). My encoding code is almost identical to the encoder_example, so I'm reasonably sure that this is not a

"Eric Christopher" <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: [...] > Please take that step back that Philip requested. Please take that step back that I requested (also on behalf of at least one of your prospect customers/users). > We do appreciate the bug reports, but not the delivery. We do appreciate your work, but not its (current) delivery! > Thanks and have a good

Hi, So far, if have understand correctly: I route the incoming tcpip message of port 8099 directly to 8080 and then the ingress filter on port 8099 has nothing to do!? Yes I think on different interface on one machine (different Ports for different Request, with different restriction). What has exactly to be done to set the policier before Prerouting! Which kernel options, or also extra

I think someone tried this recently, although I cannot find the post any more. It may be helpful, but it is not guaranteed that we will find anything. Could you please keep the discussion on the mailing list? Thanks, -- Peter Philipp Leusmann wrote: > > Wouldn't it help to sniff usb-communication with the windows driver? > > Philipp > > > -----Urspr=FCngliche

> It would be possible -- in fact, fairly easy -- to hack the > "raw" mode of MEMDISK to drop the system into big real mode > after finishing instead of real mode; such a "bigraw" mode > might solve the problem with this particular program. > > The PC hardware... gotta love it. ok, i don't understand a lot of this; but sounds nice ;) could you please

> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: Josh Coalson > > Miroslav's suggestion is the best right now. I probably should > hand-craft a stream that exercises a decoder as much as possible. I've already tested my decoder with the options -0 to -8 and it works, but the streams doesn't contain any verbatim or constant subframes. I guess this depends heavily on the input

there is some new Error:connections.tdb not initialized. balalayka:/usr/local/samba/bin # ./smbstatus params.c:OpenConfFile() - Unable to open configuration file "/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf": No such file or directory Can't load /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf - run testparm to debug it ************************************* I do copy the old smb.conf to

Since you've compiled with default options, your smb.conf is located in /usr/local/lib/smb.conf . You should copy your working smb.conf for version 2.2.7 (/etc/samba/smb.conf) to /usr/local/lib. You should run ./testparm as well. ------------------------ "A.A" <1alp@gmx.de> wrote: ------------------------ there is some new Error:connections.tdb not initialized. > >

I need the possibilities to Sync the calender with diffrent Clients like Outlook, LotusNotes, Android, and Iphone Devices. -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: dovecot <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org> Im Auftrag von Marcus Rueckert Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2018 15:28 An: dovecot at dovecot.org Betreff: Re: AW: Calendar function ? If you just need syncing without a fancy webclient:

Hi, My problem is following now: I would like to set the filters for port 8099. I have tried it, but nothing happened. When I try the same filter for the port 8080 it is working very well. .) working filter (here I can see the dropped packages): tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip u32 match ip dport 8080 0xffff police rate 1kbit burst 1 drop flowid :1 .) not working filter (here I

hi, in the meantime i uninstalled and reinstalled samba again. it' s strage because i get two directories , Samba and samba-2.2..8a !! Newertheless i did as you wrote but there is still the old Samba ther! i Killed both Daemons and do : balalayka:/etc/samba # ps fax | grep nmbd balalayka:/etc/samba # ps fax | grep nmbd balalayka:/etc/samba # cd /usr/local/samba/bin/

Il gio, 2004-07-29 alle 07:55, Bert_De_Ridder@peopleware.be ha scritto: > That is for roaming profiles, right ? > Why would I want to set that ? No, isn't. but you have to try; 'cos, in my opinion, of course, you won't login in bdc; but, the roaming profiles (home directory) must be in pdc; if that works, you will try set (in bdc): logon path = \\PDC\blablabla... (for win

You need to do ./smbstatus as well. ------------------------ "A.A" <1alp@gmx.de> wrote: ------------------------ hi, > >in the meantime i uninstalled and reinstalled samba again. >it' s strage because i get two directories , Samba and samba-2.2..8a !! >Newertheless i did as you wrote but there is still the old Samba ther! >i Killed both Daemons and do :

Hi, Yeah, I too had that one :-) The problems are access rights! So, what I did was the following: 1. I created the standard profile in WinXP (Admin) installed the progs set the docs and outlook-paths started the progs (to check they are working) set all the desktop settings (for the users!) played A LOT with "gpedit.msc" ;-) 2. I created a 2nd admin and logged in 3. in

Dear Aki thank you! With version 2.3.11 of dovecot it works fine. Yours sincerely Pascal Rudolf -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: dovecot <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org> Im Auftrag von Aki Tuomi Gesendet: Montag, 21. September 2020 17:37 An: rudolf at padaru.de; Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> Betreff: Re: AW: doveadm search segfault Dovecot 2.2.22 > On

Hi Anreas, I have problems interpreting the PIX output > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Andreas Moroder [mailto:andreas.moroder@sb-brixen.it] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. August 2002 07:56 > An: Uli Luckas > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: AW: [Samba] Samba tries to contact external IP ? > > > Hello Uli, > > the packet are TCP. Our PIX does not

> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: nero one [mailto:nero_oner@yahoo.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. August 2002 19:33 > An: Uli Luckas > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: AW: Unable to open configuration file "/etc/smb.conf" (or > whereve r i specify) > > > Hi Uli, > > I'm not really sure what i'm looking for here, but