Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Ogg spec clarification"
2003 Apr 26
1
Ogg bitstream spec question
Hi,
Is it expected that an Ogg logical bitstream might logically serve as
the physical bitstream from which other logical bitstreams might be
demuxed? I am not sure that I really see the point of doing this, but
it would certainly be possible within the current spec.
The trouble is that there are any number of ways to do the low-level
muxing of several streams into one logical stream, with
2003 Mar 02
1
Final Ogg 1.0 submission to IETF
Hi all,
just letting you know that I am about to submit the final version of the
Ogg 1.0 file format Internet-Draft to the IETF. It is due by today
(March 3, Monday - Internet Draft final submission cut-off at 09:00 ET)
for the next IETF meeting and I expect they will promote it to RFC
status at the meeting. Please send any last-minute changes to me.
Cheers,
Silvia.
<p><p>
2003 Mar 02
1
Final Ogg 1.0 submission to IETF
Hi all,
just letting you know that I am about to submit the final version of the
Ogg 1.0 file format Internet-Draft to the IETF. It is due by today
(March 3, Monday - Internet Draft final submission cut-off at 09:00 ET)
for the next IETF meeting and I expect they will promote it to RFC
status at the meeting. Please send any last-minute changes to me.
Cheers,
Silvia.
<p><p>
2006 Jul 15
1
Ogg embedding, problem with spec and/or bugs in speexenc
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 14:35 -0700, Ralph Giles wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 02:17:22PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
>
> > I'm working on support for tagging Speex files for Mutagen[0] and part
> > of the specification at [1] is confusing me. It says the first page
> > should have granulepos 0 and packetno 0. Does this really mean page
> > sequence number 0,
2006 Jul 15
2
Ogg embedding, problem with spec and/or bugs in speexenc
(Sending again after subscribing, I guess the moderator is on vacation.)
I'm working on support for tagging Speex files for Mutagen[0] and part
of the specification at [1] is confusing me. It says the first page
should have granulepos 0 and packetno 0. Does this really mean page
sequence number 0, since the Ogg format doesn't number packets?
If it doesn't mean page sequence number,
2003 Feb 13
2
Changes to Ogg format IETF I-D
Howdy,
yeah, I've finally collected all your feedback on my I-D on the Ogg
encapsulation format, many thanks to all of you! Below, I've listed the
changes that I have made to the previous version and the attachment
contains the complete new I-D. If there are any more change requests,
please send me wording proposals as it's easier to include. :)
Monty, in case you are doing any
2003 Feb 13
2
Changes to Ogg format IETF I-D
Howdy,
yeah, I've finally collected all your feedback on my I-D on the Ogg
encapsulation format, many thanks to all of you! Below, I've listed the
changes that I have made to the previous version and the attachment
contains the complete new I-D. If there are any more change requests,
please send me wording proposals as it's easier to include. :)
Monty, in case you are doing any
2005 Apr 28
2
Vorbis bistream definition / separation from ogg
Hi,
I have some questions:
1) in the sources of the encoder_example (and of course in oggenc.c,
too) I see a lot of dependance
on ogg. I want to get totally rid of ogg and use the vorbis bitstream
alone.
From this reason stems the second question:
2) is there a definition of the vorbis bitstream somewhere? I don't need
to know every single
detail, just the informations necessary to
2001 Feb 04
1
Determining stream type
Hi,
I need to encode some extra information in my sound files, in a separate
logical stream. Some day I'd like this to be streaming, so for each
page, I need to know whether it's a vorbis page or one of my own
extra-info pages. I've read the "Ogg logical bitstream framing"
document, but at the Ogg level the only "structured" info is the page
header, and that
2007 Mar 13
2
packets and OGG pages
Hello all,
my name is Mathias, I'd like to ask about some details of the OGG format because I'm quite new to it. I'd like to write a native .NET library for reading and writing Vorbis comments. It's going to be open-sourced as soon as it's finished. So here it goes:
1) When packing (Vorbis) packets to OGG pages, does a new packet always begin on a fresh OGG page? Within the
2002 Jan 18
1
Ogg and Vorbis questions
>From the top of vorbisfile.c:
/* A 'chained bitstream' is a Vorbis bitstream that contains more than
one logical bitstream arranged end to end (the only form of Ogg
multiplexing allowed in a Vorbis bitstream; grouping [parallel
multiplexing] is not allowed in Vorbis) */
Is this paragraph talking about multiple streams in a single Vorbis stream in an
Ogg, or is it talking
2003 Mar 21
1
chaining serial number
Hi,
The documentation at
http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/oggstream.html
tates that "Each chained logical bitstream must have a unique
serial number within the scope of the physical bitstream"
Doesn't this mean that the sequential multiplexed streams have
same serial number? I am confused looking at the following code
segment in vorbisfile.c
2004 Nov 11
1
Ogg spec
Hi,
I'm currently trying to implement the Ogg specification in pure Java
from scratch. (I know, something like that does exist, but that's a rewrite
from C, at least that's my impression).
I'm a bit confused with the number of lacing values/segments in a page,
and the maximum length a page can have. The specification says, that
there can be 255 segments in a page, 255 bytes each
2007 Mar 21
1
.NET tagging library for ogg Vorbis
Hello,
I've mainly finished the native ogg Vorbis tagging .NET library. It already works well for reading and writing the vorbis comments for the files I tested. The library only rewrites the entire file if it has to, and adds 2 K padding in this case so that further changes of the comments won't make it nescessary to rewrite the whole file again. I found out foobar2000 also does it this
2007 Mar 14
2
AW: packets and OGG pages
Thanks for your replys.
>packets don't always begin at the
>start of a page
OK, since I only want to read / write the Vorbis comments, I can limit it to the Vorbis header packets.
http://xiph.org/vorbis/doc/Vorbis_I_spec.html stats that the comment header always begins on the second ogg page. Since the length of the precedent identification header is fixed, this even is a fixed offset
2007 Mar 14
2
packets and OGG pages
On 15/03/07, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 12:23:47PM +0000, Mathias Kunter wrote:
> >
> > In contrast to that, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3533.txt stats the following:
> > "Ogg Vorbis provides the name and revision of the Vorbis codec,
> > the audio rate and the audio quality on the Ogg Vorbis bos page.
> > It also uses
2008 Nov 17
2
video chapters and subtitles in ogg containers
> You don't have to parse the whole file, just enough to find all the
> chain boundaries. That can still take some time, of course.
Don't you have to parse the whole file to find those ?
Technically, if you find two packets with the same serialno,
it is possible that they'd be *different* logical streams just
happening to have the same serial, which would be OK if
there was
2012 Dec 05
7
ov_open_callbacks takes so much time to open 210 MB OGG file
Why ov_open_callbacks(fd_, &vf, NULL, 0, OV_CALLBACKS_NOCLOSE) takes so
long to open OGG file?
The OGG file has just 210 MB. It takes a lot of time open the file.
I am working on OGG audio recorder and player.
Thanks in advance!
With kind regards,
Pavel
2007 Dec 11
1
Query in codebook decoding
Hello Monty,
Sorry for the wrong subject title last time. A little more clarification
needed.
When reading bit-by-bit, there is no MSb/LSb, just 'first bit' and
'last bit'. The Huffman tree is traversed from 'first bit' to last
bit'. This is a conceptual layer above the bitpacker; all you need to
know is what order the bits come out, which happens to be LSb-first.
2003 Jun 28
8
clarifications on comments spec
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hiya folks,
I've been hacking on an audio metadata library (creatively called TagLib)
which we'll be using in KDE in the next release ( == I need to get around to
finishing it). I've got the Vorbis comment implementation working, but just
wanted to clarify a couple of things:
*) The vendor ID -- "vendor" is ambiguous here. Is