similar to: Multichannel files

I noticed that my previous message is not very complete so I send here an "enhanced version". Please disregard the old one an reply to this one only. ( you can delete the ATTENTION word from subject ) Wilson (defiler@null.net) wrote : > There are two ways to decode multi-channel audio. In hardware, or in > software. > Hardware: A receiver or processor takes a Dolby Digital

Hi, are there any plans for FLAC to implement spatial audio? Or maybe Atmos on FLAC? renatas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20170810/57a79181/attachment.html>

Hello to the list, and please forgive me if this has already been asked before. (I am new here, you see) The question is really simple: Can I use FLAC to create multichannel files, ranging from 3-channel LCR, through Quad, 4.1 to 5.1 and possibly (later) above? The projects details are essentially this: DVD-Audio, containing MLP Lossless in stereo & surround/multichannel. Video_TS folder

>Yesterday I have finished writing the ambisonic pan filter for oggenc. May I ask what this "pan filter" is? I made some tentative suggestions for coupling Ambisonic B-format in a post "Vorbis Ambisonic coupling" on 4feb07 I gather from the last monthly meeting, that some of you, including Monty, had problems with the phase behaviour of B-format. Would anyone like a

It obviously would be nice to have such a mode available, for e.g. DVD audio compression. Apparently, the list doesn''t tell me too much about it. My questions are: 1. What is the current status of the 5.1 channel coupling in Vorbis? 2. If I''ll be interested in participation in its development, what is the recommended reading? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

On 20030610: Gregory Maxwell wrote: (in reply to Ralph Giles) >> I assume you're aware of the technical documentation on dolby's site? >> (http://www.dolby.com/pro/) In particular the surround mixing guide has >> a lot of detailed guidelines. I don't have any practical experience >> with it though, so I can't vouch for it. >Yes I am. I've done a

I've been doing a fair amount of work with Vorbis support for Ambisonics, which seems to be going along nicely. It seems that there is signifant interest in coding 5.1 material with Vorbis esp as tarkin becomes more complete, so I've decided to take a break from pure ambisonic work to look into this. I've decided that the best (from a pure elegance and patent avoidance) way to handle

I've been doing a fair amount of work with Vorbis support for Ambisonics, which seems to be going along nicely. It seems that there is signifant interest in coding 5.1 material with Vorbis esp as tarkin becomes more complete, so I've decided to take a break from pure ambisonic work to look into this. I've decided that the best (from a pure elegance and patent avoidance) way to handle

I made a few updates to OggPCM2 http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggPCM2 reflecting the latest discussions. Could everyone have a look at it and see if they agree. Otherwise, what do you feel should be changed? Anyone wants to speak in support of chunked PCM? For all those that are just tired of this mess like me, please express yourself in the new spec I created: OggPCM3

The prospect of people actually putting B-format audio (via the panner or directly input) into Ogg/Vorbis brings an interesting challenge: What do we do with the audio after decoding it? The following sane options exist: A) Simply output the B-format audio B) Produce a downmix 1) Mono. 2) Stereo blumlein crossed pairs 3) Stereo UHJ 4) binaural C) Produce speaker feeds 1) Fully

I vote for documenting the --channel-map option in the --help I don't like the idea of rejecting a multichannel file merely for mapping, so there should be a documented option plus an error message pointing to the option. This should compare to the WAVE and AIFF errors where the utility suggests to the user how to get the file converted safely. Brian Willoughby Sound Consulting On

Jared (jared@celab21.students.csee.uq.edu.au) wrote : > Saw an article today on /. which reports that Dolby are insisting the > NETBSD dudes remove the ac3dec package from their site. Someone suggested > that we need an open source solution. ac3dec is already open ( GPL ). > Could Vorbis in the Ogg framework be this solution, can we create a pretty > simple 5.1 stream? I

Hi everyone, Over the last two weeks or so, I've been thinking about how to add surround sound to Ogg -- and more than that, to do it in the best way possible. With this in mind, I started considering using Ambisonic surround sound. The advantages of this format are considerable: a) It was developed in the early to mid '70s, so the patents should be expired by now.

Hi. I have two CDs that the artists inteded for simultaneous listening. They even provide instructions on how to start two CD players with the minimal time shift. (for those interested - the CDs are Neurosis/Times Of Grace and Tribes Of Neurot/Grace) I've heard that Vorbis can encode multiple streams. I've already encoded both albums into regular 2-channel .ogg files. The questions

On Jan 17, 2013, at 21:41, Ralph Giles wrote: > On 13-01-17 7:26 PM, Brian Willoughby wrote: >> I vote for documenting the --channel-map option in the --help > > Do you ever use --channel-map yourself, or recommend it to clients? Professional surround mastering is delivered on very specific media, and FLAC is not an option (to my knowledge). I use FLAC for archival of original

Hi, Has anyone thought about using the multichannel format as a way of distributing "musician minus one" files? Eh? I hear you ask. Ok. Basically these are multitrack files but you can mute the solo track so you, the musician, can practice against the other "players". You can buy CD's of this nature, but of course, the solo instrument is on one channel and the others on

Hi All, Are multi-channel (more than 2) formats fully supported in the OggVorbis specification ? I couldn't find any information about multi-channel support on xiph.org. I've used 'oggdropXPd' to encode a 5.1 wavefile and the Xiph OggVorbis libraries (vorbisfile.dll) to decode the file successfully, however the order of the channel interleaving is different to the original wave

On Jan 12, 2013, at 05:30, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 12-01-13 08:23, pyth.flac-dev.5.pyt at spamgourmet.com wrote: >> I seem to recall that changes in the second number indicated a minor >> change in the *format* of the file itself (for example, 1.1.x to >> 1.2.x >> introduced a new rice coding option used for 24-bit files). > > Well, the only change in

I apologize for the terribly long message, but here goes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- First, regarding existing tools that I now about. libavcodec and users (e.g. HandBrake): - if there are 6 channels or less, the layout is set by the decoder as per the FLAC specification - if there are more than 6 channels, the layout is

Just looked at http://slashdot.org/articles/02/01/01/0931212.shtml. Why wasn´t this announced at this list? Anyway, terrific work you developers! /Andreas Karlsson http://www.ft2.net <p><p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org'