Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "envelope.c CVS vorbis compile error."
2002 Jul 19
2
compile optimization error in libvorbis-1.0
Wow, I've never seen an FSF gcc crap out like this on a non-overheating
system. When lib/envelope.c is compiled with -march=i686, gcc gets a
signal 11, but not with -march=i586. I'm not sure whether to blame gcc
or libvorbis. There are apparently three other files in libvorbis where
this same behavior is seen.
jeffrey@diddl:/usr/src/build/libvorbis-1.0/lib$ gcc
2002 Jan 10
1
Trouble building libvorbis-1.0rc3
Hi all,
I was just trying to build myself a RC3 set of Ogg/Vorbis libs and
tools, but the build of libvorbis bombs out on me while making all in
examples. I've ./configure'd with no options, which gave no warnings
or errors. After that a normal make gives the below attached output.
Can anyone tell me what I've done wrong ?
I've also tried removing the examples/ directory. After
2001 Oct 27
3
libvorbis won't compile on LFS.
This is a linux from scratch based on the 2.4.13 kernel. I'm using a GCC
2.95.3, autoconf 2.52, and automake 1.5. Libvorbis compilation fails with a
Signal 11 error as shown below. I had the same results with 2.4.12, 2.4.10,
and 2.4.9. I've compiled hundreds of other packages without getting this
error, and I've even tried changing the memory.
This is my configure line, I used
2001 Oct 27
3
libvorbis won't compile on LFS.
This is a linux from scratch based on the 2.4.13 kernel. I'm using a GCC
2.95.3, autoconf 2.52, and automake 1.5. Libvorbis compilation fails with a
Signal 11 error as shown below. I had the same results with 2.4.12, 2.4.10,
and 2.4.9. I've compiled hundreds of other packages without getting this
error, and I've even tried changing the memory.
This is my configure line, I used
2003 Jun 03
1
libvorbis install prob
I'm haivng trouble compiling the libvoribis source. I'm getting errors I don't
understand, could somebody please look at the below and tell me if they have
any ideas??
<p>make[2]: Entering directory `/root/libvorbis-1.0/lib'
source='mdct.c' object='mdct.lo' libtool=yes \
depfile='.deps/mdct.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/mdct.TPlo' \
depmode=gcc3
2001 Jun 03
1
Difficulty with R CMD INSTALL
I am running Linux Mandrake 7.2 with the following:
platform i586-pc-linux-gnu
arch i586
os linux-gnu
system i586, linux-gnu
status
major 1
minor 2.3
year 2001
month 04
day 26
language R
To build a package I ran R CMD build Hmisc, apparently with success:
* checking for file `Hmisc/DESCRIPTION' ... OK
* preparing `Hmisc':
* cleaning src
* checking
2005 Jul 22
2
[LLVMdev] Need help on SPEC 95 "standard" commandlines
Some of the run commandlines don't seem to be the *default ref*
configuration. For instance, in 099.go, what's in the script is:
LEVEL = ../../../..
BM=099.go
ifeq ($(RUN_TYPE),test)
STDIN_FILENAME = /dev/null
STDOUT_FILENAME = null.out
RUN_OPTIONS = 40 19
else
STDIN_FILENAME = 2stone9.in
STDOUT_FILENAME = 2stone9.out
RUN_OPTIONS = 50 9
endif
include ../../Makefile.spec95
2005 Jul 22
0
[LLVMdev] Need help on SPEC 95 "standard" commandlines
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Long Fei wrote:
> Does anyone know the "standard" commandline to compile and run spec95
> benchmarks ?
>
> I found some scripts in llvm test suite (External/SPEC/CINT95), but I am not
> sure if they are the *default ref* configurations. <Some of them seem to use
> smaller problem sizes.> SPEC95 was retired many years ago, so few people
2005 Jul 22
0
[LLVMdev] Need help on SPEC 95 "standard" commandlines
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Long Fei wrote:
> which suggests the compiling command:
> gcc -DSPEC_CPU95 -O2 -o spec_go g2.c g22.c g23.c g25.c g26.c g27a.c g27b.c
> g28.c g29.c g2eye.c g2jlib2.c g2jos.c g2list.c g2reas.c g2s2.c g2s3.c g2shp.c
> and the running commandline:
> ./spec_go 50 9 2stone9.in
> < are these correct ? >
I believe that we only include test/train inputs for
2013 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM
----- Original Message -----
> Hi Evan,
>
> We did an experiment using the LLVM test suite: we compare the
> overhead of using our analysis to the LLVM default, both with -O2
> option.
It might also be interesting to try with -O3; I don't know if we have any significant vectorizable loops in the test suite with a large number of arrays, but if we do, this kind of analysis
2013 Oct 22
3
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi Evan,
> >
> > We did an experiment using the LLVM test suite: we compare the
> > overhead of using our analysis to the LLVM default, both with -O2
> > option.
>
> It might also be interesting to try with -O3; I don't know if we have any
2002 Oct 23
2
CVS vorbis, fatal cc1
current Vorbis cvs gives:
gcc -DPACKAGE=\"libvorbis\" -DVERSION=\"1.0\" -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1
-DHAVE_ALLOCA_H=1 -DHAVE_ALLOCA=1 -I. -I. -I../include -O20
--fast-math -mno-ieee-fp -D_REENTRANT -fsigned-char -O2 -march=i686
-mcpu=i686 -DUSE_MEMORY_H -Wp,-MD,.deps/envelope.cpp -c envelope.c
-fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/envelope.lo
gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal
2000 Nov 06
1
Problems compiling with --with-ogg-prefix=xxx
My ogg library is located in /home/warren/local. So when I configure and
compile the vorbis module on my linux box using
configure --with-ogg-prefix=/home/warren/local
make
I get the following error during the make:
gcc -DPACKAGE=\"libvorbis\" -DVERSION=\"1.0.0\" -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H=1
-DHAVE_ALLOCA=1 -I. -I. -I../include -O20 -ffast-math -mno-ieee-fp
-D_REENTRANT
2000 Nov 07
1
More BeOS woe
This one may be my fault....
I've put a temporary fix for libvorbis not linking, I
altered
libvorbis_la_LIBADD =
to
libvorbis_la_LIBADD = $(OGG_LIBS)
in the makefile, hence the temporary and continued with the build. I'm now
getting
gcc -DPACKAGE=\"libvorbis\" -DVERSION=\"1.0.0\" -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H=1 -
DHAVE_ALLOCA=1 -I. -I. -I../include
2004 Aug 06
2
DarkIce
Can I be any more trouble today? :)
This almost worked. ./configure worked but when I ran make I got this...a Redhat bug?
depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../depcomp \
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../include -I. -I../libmp3lame -I.. -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fthread-jumps -malign-double -frerun-loop-opt -fgcse -fexpensive-optimizations
2005 Jul 22
2
[LLVMdev] Need help on SPEC 95 "standard" commandlines
Does anyone know the "standard" commandline to compile and run spec95
benchmarks ?
I found some scripts in llvm test suite (External/SPEC/CINT95), but I am
not sure if they are the *default ref* configurations. <Some of them
seem to use smaller problem sizes.> SPEC95 was retired many years ago,
so few people around me know how to compile and run them.
I am building from
2005 Aug 18
1
Reg. Enabling Debugging.
Hi,
This is a repeat question.
Earlier I had asked the same question and eventually found the ans.
(http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2005-August/018179.html)
However now when I try the same thing somehow I am not able to use
debugging.
To use debugging, i compiled the source using the folloing commands,.
>make clean
>./autogen.sh --enable-DEBUG
>make
The configure.in has
2004 Sep 10
0
flac + gcc 3.0 problem, possible solution
I remember someone saying that compiling flac
with gcc 3.0 yields a broken executable. I saw this
on the Lame list that might explain the problem. I don't
have a gcc 3.0 setup yet but somebody may be able
to verify this...
--- Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote:
> From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
> Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame and
2013 Oct 22
2
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM
Hi Evan,
We did an experiment using the LLVM test suite: we compare the
overhead of using our analysis to the LLVM default, both with -O2
option.
The overall overhead of compiling the whole test suite using our
analysis is 36.5%.
The biggest overhead is observed in
"SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-5", where we are 5 times slower:
0.07s (with our analysis) compared to
2013 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> It might also be interesting to try with -O3; I don't know if we have any
>> significant vectorizable loops in the test suite with a large number of