similar to: MMX/3dNow! etc

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "MMX/3dNow! etc"

2002 Jan 15
1
Ogg Vorbis and MMX/3dnow
Are there any plans for Ogg Vorbis to support MMX/3dnow optimizations? I think this is the major reason why the decoding of mp3's is faster than ogg in XMMS. Regards, Charles -- The box saids Windows XP or better, so I installed Linux --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
2002 Jan 01
4
RC3?
Just looked at http://slashdot.org/articles/02/01/01/0931212.shtml. Why wasn´t this announced at this list? Anyway, terrific work you developers! /Andreas Karlsson http://www.ft2.net <p><p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org'
2013 Mar 05
0
Patch for format.ftable()
Dear expeRts, Please find attached the .diff for a bug fix in R-devel 62124. format.ftable() fails to format ftable()s correctly which have no row.vars or no col.vars. That should work with the patch (the example code below also runs correctly for all the (new) 'method's). Cheers, Marius --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (ft1 <- ftable(Titanic,
2007 Dec 30
2
Patch: fragment reconstruction MMX for GCC
Hi again, I measured my fragment reconstructions against the compiler output from GCC and well - the new codes perform better, so I brushed up my gcc inline assembler skills and made a port. Code is here: http://torus.untergrund.net/code/mmxfrag.c All routines perform much better now. Inter2 alone got a speedup of factor 5 on Pentium-M. Athlon CPU's execute roughly 3 times faster.
2013 Nov 05
2
multi
[[1]]              [,1]      [,2] [1,]  0.003632559 0.2190629 [2,] -2.090772847 0.2190629 [[2]]             [,1]       [,2] [1,] 0.004278991 0.04337005 [2,] 0.190723602 0.04337005 [[3]]            [,1]        [,2] [1,] 0.01237827 -0.01544811 [2,] 0.06452200 -0.01544811 g<-c(1,2,3) function(g,hessianList){    for(i in 1:3){          ft1<-g[2]*hessianList[[2]]          ft2<-sum(ft1)   
2017 Jan 10
3
Problems with bind9_dlz when rndc is reloaded
Hi guys, I'm facing a problems with samba4 + bind9_dlz that consuming my time for several days. Everything is working fine until samba4 need to update dns when I'm work with more than one DC server. When samba (or bind) need to reload all zones, the module bind9_dlz is shutting down and then all my environment stops and I need to restart the bind to up again. See my log: ... Jan
2017 Jan 12
2
Problems with bind9_dlz when rndc is reloaded
Mathias, Thanks for your reply. Please, try to start your bind with some debug level and run commando "rndc reload" and see the end of the log. I saw samba source code and found the destroy dns function in dlz_bind9.c and called by turture blz_bind9.c. When dlz_bind9.c is shutting down, I get this error when I try to update dns. update failed: NOTAUTH Failed nsupdate: 2
2017 Jan 12
2
Problems with bind9_dlz when rndc is reloaded
Using your log parameters, the shutting down message is not showed, but when I reload rndc a get the same effect. Everything is working fine until bond9_dlz needs to reload (and no restart) rndc. When this happens, I need to restart bind and everything works fine again. I'm starting named with named -d 3 -u named and using /var/log/messages. See log using your parameters: # rndc reload
2004 Nov 30
1
lme in R-2.0.0: Problem with lmeControl
Hello! One note/question hier about specification of control-parameters in the lme(...,control=list(...)) function call: i tried to specify tne number of iteration needed via lme(....,control=list(maxIter=..., niterEM=...,msVerbose=TRUE)) but every time i change the defualt values maxIter (e.g. maxIter=1, niterEM=0) on ones specified by me, the call returns all the iterations needed until
2001 Nov 14
7
Multichannel files
Hi, As I´ve understood things, the Ogg Vorbis format supports more that two channels (stereo). Is there any tools to encode x sourcefiles into one .ogg file? I am a musican and am thrilled with the ide of makeing music in surround (or in more than stereo). This leads to my next question: is there (developing) any decoders for multichannel oggs to, let us say, 4.1 or 5.1 surround? Wouldn´t it
2015 Jan 07
1
Optimizing on AMD Geode (MMX, no SSE)
I'm trying to improve Opus on an AMD Geode CPU, which has limited SSE support (called 3DNow!), but MMX. Without optimizations I can only encode 16 bit audio @16KHz with complexity up to 2-3 without underruns. I tried compiling with SSE2/4 optimizations, but all I got was a crash with SIGILL, so I looked into optimized code and found that a good starting point was the dot product, so I
2009 Oct 02
3
Tabulating using arbitrary numbers of factors
Dear R-help, First of all, thank you VERY much for any help you have time to offer. I greatly appreciate it. I would like to write a function that, given an arbitrary number of factors from a data frame, tabulates the number of occurrences of each unique combination of the factors. Cleary, this works: > table(horse,date,surface) <SNIP> , , surface = TURF
2009 Jun 17
2
Using a cgi perl program?
I have a cgi/perl program that I want to use on the same server as my RoR app and I keep getting: The page you were looking for doesn''t exist. You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved. I load the program to the cgi-bin directory in its own folder /cgi-bin/ fump/ In the /public folder of my app I have the following .htaccess file: # General Apache options
2003 May 08
3
MMX and extended-MMX acceleration patch for encoding
Hello, attached is a gzipped patch file to the lib/mcomp.c source file of theora (as of AnonCVS current version) that implements MMX and extended-MMX optimizations in the most frequently used functions of the encoder (as shown by gprof). This is more a proof of concept than a real request for inclusion into the source tree. My personal intent was more to look deeper into the MMX instruction set
2008 Nov 20
0
[LLVMdev] changing -mattr behavior with mmx and sse
Might you instead consider just adding a -disable-mmx option? Preston On Thu, 2008-20-11 at 02:57 -0500, Mon Ping Wang wrote: > Hi, > > When setting -mattr option on X86, I would like to treat MMX > separately from SSE levels. This would allow a client who sets the > attributes directly to set the SSE level independent of MMX, e.g., llc > -march=x86 -mattr=sse41, one would get
2008 Nov 20
0
[LLVMdev] changing -mattr behavior with mmx and sse
On Nov 19, 2008, at 11:57 PMPST, Mon Ping Wang wrote: > Hi, > > When setting -mattr option on X86, I would like to treat MMX > separately from SSE levels. This would allow a client who sets the > attributes directly to set the SSE level independent of MMX, e.g., llc > -march=x86 -mattr=sse41, one would get sse4.1 with mmx disabled while > llc -march=x86 -mattr=mmx
2005 Aug 25
0
libtheora-mmx-1.0alpha5 release
Along with libtheora-1.0alpha5 this is a release of theora-mmx. A drop in replacement that uses MMX assembly to speedup some of the most demanding routines in theora encoding/decoding. Right now it only works on 32bit x86 CPUs. Thanks to everyone whose work made this release possible! Download links: http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/theora/libtheora-mmx-1.0alpha5.tar.bz2
2008 Nov 20
1
[LLVMdev] changing -mattr behavior with mmx and sse
Hi Dale, I will not change the default. I would dislike to see any regressions due to this type of change. -- Mon Ping On Nov 20, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2008, at 11:57 PMPST, Mon Ping Wang wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> When setting -mattr option on X86, I would like to treat MMX >> separately from SSE levels. This would allow a
2010 Sep 08
4
[LLVMdev] MMX vs SSE
I'm working on changing the MMX implementation to use intrinsics in all cases, which should stop various optimization passes from creating MMX instructions that screw up the x87 stack. Right now the MMX instructions are split between X86InstrMMX.td and X86InstrSSE.td, presumably on the historical grounds that some of them weren't introduced until SSE or SSSE3, and require
2008 Nov 20
1
[LLVMdev] changing -mattr behavior with mmx and sse
On Nov 20, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Preston Gurd wrote: > Might you instead consider just adding a -disable-mmx option? I agree, this is a better approach. This distinguishes between capabilities of the chip and the desire to codegen specific vectors one way or another. -Chris > > Preston > > On Thu, 2008-20-11 at 02:57 -0500, Mon Ping Wang wrote: >> Hi, >> >>