similar to: New Vorbis player app

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "New Vorbis player app"

2000 Dec 30
1
squelch-1.0beta5 ready
I've made squelch-1.0beta5 and uploaded it - you can find it linked from http://www.geoid.clara.net/rik/squelch.html This version has a config dialog. It works out which output drivers libao has available and gives you a choice. You can also tell it where your 'audio dir' is - though that works a bit strangely at the moment - when you change it, all the files you have in your playlist
2001 Apr 18
4
squelch-1.0beta12 released
<ad> .q.u.e.l.c.h is an audio player dedicated to Ogg Vorbis. This is a bugfix release. RPMs available for i386, i486, i586, i686 and Athlon. Source available as tar.gz, tar.bz2 and src.rpm. http://www.geoid.clara.net/rik/squelch.html Tested on Linux, may work elsewhere. Requires only Vorbis, libao and Qt (compiled with thread support.) </ad> Have fun ;) Rik --- >8 ----
2001 Feb 06
3
Squelch 1.0beta9
Hi, I released Squelch 1.0beta9. It's a multi-platform Ogg Vorbis player, if you haven't heard of it. [1] Find it here: http://www.geoid.clara.net/rik/squelch.html Differences from beta8: * Vorbis comment editor ! [2] * More intelligent re-initialisation of output driver. * Stupid bugs in auto-update of master track list resolved. * Some bugs fixed, some more introduced ;) In theory,
2001 Feb 09
0
squelch-1.0beta10
I decided to write a changelog for once. Here's the text for this release: * Fixed repaint of last column in master track list. * Turned radio buttons into combo box in config dialog, used Qt Designer to make it instead of hand-coding. * Now plays sample rates other than 44100 and channel count other than 2, so you can play 22050Hz monaural recordings if you're that
1998 Jun 05
1
Simple password checker
I'm attempting to get a Linux box to authenticate users from NT. I think it's possible by writing a PAM module (not hard) and using part of Samba's source to verify the password on the NT server. I'm getting pretty bogged down trying to work out how to do this - it seems like it should be simple - just take the password and username and ask the NT server if it's correct. If
2004 Oct 22
0
libao-0.8.5 patch
Hi! There are some little inconvenience in libao-0.8.5. - The biggest is may that: the documentation and the header file declare the ao_file_extension function, which give a hint for the file extension where the device is realy a sound file. This function is missing. -An other: the alsa 0.5 and the alsa 0.9+ drivers short name. It will be better if the alsa 0.5's name will be alsa05 and the
2001 Jan 16
0
Vorbis tag editor
I've written a vorbis tag editor. It does everything but save. I'll wait until there's support in the vorbis libs for that. If you want to read vorbis tags, you could of course use ogg123 -d null but I thought I'd get a nice front end ready anyway. The major part of the code is the logic ("When is the 'Save' button enabled ?", etc.) The UI is easy to change,
2000 Dec 30
0
forgot to mention
I also added a .desktop file for Gnome/KDE so that you can click on squelch from your panel etc. No icon right now - tmake doesn't support installing, so it's quite difficult to get that to work. Also I put a tiny script called 'squelch_wrapper' in the dist, which sets your LD_LIBRARY_PATH before running squelch - this way, you get the right Qt library loaded. Rik --- >8
2007 Feb 27
2
Preprocessor denoise. Does it work?
Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Andy Ross wrote: > > Uh, production applications almost always require squelch, no? > > Some do, some don't. In general, distinguishing between a keyboard > and a speech transient is next to impossible based only on a few ms > of speech. That is true for distinguishing it by waveform, but not by amplitude. As I mentioned, these transients are
2007 Feb 27
0
Preprocessor denoise. Does it work?
> That is true for distinguishing it by waveform, but not by amplitude. > As I mentioned, these transients are objectively tiny. *Your* transients may be "tiny" and in any case, it doesn't help if you don't know the level you're recording at. I guess I'd be > curious as to which voice codec applications require no squelch (other > than trivial examples
2007 Feb 27
0
Preprocessor denoise. Does it work?
Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Andy Ross wrote: > > Not knowing how VAD works, I can't say for sure. > > There are many ways to implement a VAD. I meant "not knowing how speex's VAD works", of course, not VAD in general. If you would stop interpreting everything I say in the least charitable manner, this might be going more smoothly than it is. (Tom was right, by the
2007 Feb 27
3
Preprocessor denoise. Does it work?
Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > The noise suppressor will only attempt to remove stationary noise, > such as thermal noise, fans, ... The AGC can indeed do strange > things in these cases, but it's been improved in svn (compared to > 1.2beta1). OK, then the problem is that I misunderstood the feature. I assumed that dynamic squelch was part of it, but it's really something more
2007 Feb 27
0
Preprocessor denoise. Does it work?
> OK, then the problem is that I misunderstood the feature. I assumed > that dynamic squelch was part of it, but it's really something more > along the lines of active noise cancellation. That's fine, I'll work > on improving my own squelch code. No. Active noise cancellation is yet another thing, where you cancel the noise in the "acoustic world" by
2001 Nov 29
1
patch from faith@alephnull to add rate indicator to --progress
Any votes for/against? ----- Forwarded message from Rik Faith <faith@alephnull.com> ----- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:55:29 -0500 From: Rik Faith <faith@alephnull.com> To: mbp@samba.org Subject: rsync patch X-Mailer: VM 6.96; XEmacs 21.1; Linux 2.4.16 (light) Here is a patch that adds rate information (e.g., kB/s) to the --progress display. I just noticed that 2.4.7pre4 is coming
2013 Jun 12
2
Functions within functions - environments
Dear list, I have a problem with nested functions and I don't manage to get it solved. I know I should be looking in environments, and I have tried a lot, but it keeps on erroring. An easy version of the problem is as follows: innerfunction<-function() { print(paste(a, " from inner function")) print(paste(b, " from inner function")) setwd(wd) }
2001 Jan 19
2
Adding ao_get_latency() ?
I've added ao_get_latency to my copy of ao. This function allows you to discover the number of bytes that are buffered between yourself and the speakers. Status for the various devices: * null - implemented (just returns 0.) * wav - implemented (just returns 0.) * esd - implemented but untested. * oss - implemented. * alsa - implemented. * arts - implemented. * solaris -
2012 Dec 31
2
code to convert 3D geographical coordinates to Cartesian?
Is there packaged code to convert geographical coordinates (e.g., longitude, latitude, elevation) to Cartesian coordinates in 3-space? I can see how to do this using 1. a spherical-to-Cartesian conversion like pracma::sph2cart(tpr) http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pracma/ 2. a geographical-to-spherical conversion. This seems to involve (in roughly increasing order of difficulty or
2007 Feb 27
2
Preprocessor denoise. Does it work?
There are many ways to implement a VAD. What you described is actually perfectly equivalent to the most trivial (and least robust) VAD algorithm. Jean-Marc Andy Ross wrote: > Ton Grandgent wrote: >> Andy Ross wrotte: >>> I wrote a trivial squelch feature* in 10 minutes that works >>> basically 100% of the time. >> Could you please explain how this differs from
2007 Feb 27
2
Preprocessor denoise. Does it work?
I'm having trouble with the preprocessor's noise reduction feature. The basic issue is that it simply doesn't work very well. With my laptop (whose microphone is otherwise quite capable) I routinely hear transient background noise, typing, and other "quiet" sounds leaking through to the speex stream. Even worse, the AGC feature is blowing these things up into just awful
2007 Feb 27
2
Preprocessor denoise. Does it work?
Andy Ross <andy@plausible.org> wrote: > > I wrote a trivial squelch feature* in 10 minutes that works > basically 100% of the time. > > * Zero the sample data if the maximum sample in a frame is less than > 4% of saturation or 20% of the maximum sample yet seen. It's about > 8 lines of code. Could you please explain how this differs from VAD? Tom