similar to: 16kbps ogg encoder when?

Folks, Has anyone successfully compiled the Vorbis source code on Windows 98 with Visual C++ 6.0?? FR __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/

Comments on the following, anyone? This means you, Monty. What's causing the gain he's seeing? Is this a matter of codebook precision, again? Michael From: "Arny Krueger" <pcavtech@home.com> To: <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> Subject: OGG level mismatch Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 05:11:02 -0400 I just downloaded the OGG 0.4 encoder and OGG 0.1 plug in for Winamp. I found

Is the vorbis encoder a console app? If so it should already run on OS/2? Or is that only 16 bit console apps that ran on OS/2? love Freya --- Michael Smith <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> wrote: > At 07:09 AM 1/3/01 +0100, you wrote: > > > > > >On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Kenneth C. Arnold wrote: > > > >> Remember that since oggenc is GPL (and the Vorbis >

It is commonly said here that if I want to make AM radio-quality stuff at very low bitrates, a good way is to downsample. I downsampled a song to 11025Hz mono and encoded with -q 0, the result is about 18kbps and is at least radio quality. The downsampler I used is from Edinburgh speech tools, named ch_wave. `sox' performs terribly, so I didn't use it. However, I heard some unpleasant

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:53:29 -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 03:03:28AM +0100, Andy Baxter wrote: > >> Is there any way to bring the bitrate in ices2 down below 32 kbps? > > Generally the trick for this is to downsample the audio before encoding. > You can ask ices to do this with a resample stanza in the config file: > > <resample>

---------- > Van: ORK <korsmo@solungen.hm.no> > Aan: vorbis@xiph.org > Onderwerp: [vorbis] OggEnc help file > Datum: maandag 3 september 2001 18:21 > > Somebody asked how to use OggEnc a while ago. > > OggEnc v0.8 (libvorbis rc2) > (c) 2001 Michael Smith <msmith@labyrinth.net.au) > > Usage: oggenc [options] input.wav [...] LOL! --- >8 ---- List

Do you mean ices 0.2.3? If so, I'm still getting the same error. <p>On December 12, 2002 18:34, msmith@labyrinth.net.au wrote: > Duke <list_usr@spacebox.net> said: > > I'm certain I've got everything configured correctly, however, I keep > > getting the following message when trying to run ices: > > ices 0.x doesn't use the same protocol as

On Sun, 23 May 2004, Conrad Parker wrote: > On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:04:28AM +1000, Kenji Chan wrote: > > Is that ok for vorbis to encode 24bits/96KHz audio? > yes, oggenc should be able to handle it. Not only does it handle it fine: but most players will downsample the 96k audio for playback on non 96k able hardware. (24bittage isn't an issue as Vorbis is 24bit internally,

I finally got around to getting this to a more-or-less working state. Right now, it does most of what vorbize does, plus support for encoding multiple files (this works, but needs some additions to sanely handle titles, etc. for multiple files). The name is temporary, until I think of something better. http://www.labyrinth.net.au/~msmith/oggenc-0.1.tar.gz Hopefully, it's mostly portable,

I am resending this ( for the third time, mispelled vorbis-dev-@xiph.org ), because the last time it didn't make it ( it didn't appear on the web archive at www.xiph.org , the archive of vorbis-list for the current month is broken BTW ) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [vorbis-dev] WAVE loader for oggenc and oggdrop Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 13:44:47 +0200 From: David Balazic

True, this is not be a valid port, but if the code checked for invalid options like this it could improve the user experience. I know my suggestion could be picky (not my fault... I work in QA! :-) -Scott -----Original Message----- From: Michael Smith [mailto:msmith@labyrinth.net.au] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:31 AM To: icecast@xiph.org Subject: Re: [icecast] Multiple Instances are Crashing

--------------------------------------- Regards, Slava Shklyar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:11 Subject: Re: [icecast] icecast status page -status.xsl <p>> At 11:59 PM 10/8/02 -0600, you wrote: > >So I point my browser to > > >

--------------------------------------- Regards, Slava Shklyar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:14 Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast2 issues continue <p>> At 04:08 PM 10/9/02 +1000, you wrote: > >Hi: > > > >Well, up until about a week ago, we had

--------------------------------------- Regards, Slava Shklyar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:14 Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast2 issues continue <p>> At 04:08 PM 10/9/02 +1000, you wrote: > >Hi: > > > >Well, up until about a week ago, we had

--------------------------------------- Regards, Slava Shklyar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:14 Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast2 issues continue <p>> At 04:08 PM 10/9/02 +1000, you wrote: > >Hi: > > > >Well, up until about a week ago, we had

--------------------------------------- Regards, Slava Shklyar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:14 Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast2 issues continue <p>> At 04:08 PM 10/9/02 +1000, you wrote: > >Hi: > > > >Well, up until about a week ago, we had

--------------------------------------- Regards, Slava Shklyar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:14 Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast2 issues continue <p>> At 04:08 PM 10/9/02 +1000, you wrote: > >Hi: > > > >Well, up until about a week ago, we had

--------------------------------------- Regards, Slava Shklyar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:14 Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast2 issues continue <p>> At 04:08 PM 10/9/02 +1000, you wrote: > >Hi: > > > >Well, up until about a week ago, we had

--------------------------------------- Regards, Slava Shklyar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:14 Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast2 issues continue <p>> At 04:08 PM 10/9/02 +1000, you wrote: > >Hi: > > > >Well, up until about a week ago, we had

--------------------------------------- Regards, Slava Shklyar ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:14 Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast2 issues continue <p>> At 04:08 PM 10/9/02 +1000, you wrote: > >Hi: > > > >Well, up until about a week ago, we had