similar to: The spammers have discovered us

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "The spammers have discovered us"

2010 Feb 01
1
nut mailing-list user by spammers
Hi, FYI, I started receiving spam to the email address I use only for this mailing-list, about one week after I posted a couple messages onto it. So the nut mailing-list is definitely used by spammers for email addresses harvesting :-( -- Michel Bouissou <michel at bouissou.net> OpenPGP ID 0xEB04D09C
2011 Oct 17
1
Spammers attempting SASL Auth
Hi This is a new one on me - I've never seen spammers attempt to use to SASL Auth to inject spam. None of the users they are trying (newsletter, dummy, test, etc.) exist, but what worries me is the illegal chars error - is this a known vulnerability in dovecot they are trying to exploit? I'm running 1:1.2.15-7 installed from apt-get.. Oct 17 15:07:16 mail postfix/smtpd[14422]: connect
2003 Aug 08
1
[LLVMdev] Spammers
Clearly spammers have entered our midst. Having this list be moderated would be a good thing I think. -- Robert. At 12:00 PM 8/8/03 -0500, you wrote: >Send LLVMdev mailing list submissions to > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >or, via email, send a message
2007 Jan 07
0
making textfields unscannable by spammers? use fleximage?
hi, i am building a site and would like to make it so spammers cant copy phone numbers and emails. would using something like this help solve this problem? http://beautifulpixel.com/articles/2006/11/03/fleximage-can-draw-text thanks. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the
2009 Jul 14
3
Is Enum safe from spammers?
Just been contacted by a UK Enum registrar looking for ITSPs to become resellers of their Enum registration systems ... Is anyone using Enum? Does anyone (other than cynical old me) think that Enum is a spammers best friend? Has anyone received a spam VoIP call yet? (ie. one placed directly over the Internet aimed at a SIP URI to a PBX which allows anonymous incoming calls?) I can see that
2001 Nov 08
1
What kind of Ogg Vorbis-services you would like to
> * Here is the most innovative idea here: > > Have collobarative playlist editing abilities (conference). I don't think > this has ever been done. Imagine 3 people going on a picnic. Each one > has a portable player. They connect to their music collection, decide > together which songs they want to take with them, divide them among the > portables and load them
2004 Aug 06
0
OT spammers was Re:what's happening here?
Ahah. I will end this here. I misread the newsgroup address on the original 'what's happening here', assuming it was for the vox group, which encourages idle rubbish. I hit reply, and believed I was mailing to this group. I apologise for wasting the bandwidth if icecast group members with such things. This is also why I did not hide my headers. If you like, mail me off-list and I
2006 Feb 11
1
Spammers on the mailing list?
In respose to my "when is update 3 coming out?" I received the following mail from brian.trudeau at eastek-intl.com offlist. Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [04E-0B7CC3CC-3842]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. Thank You, Support Staff
2005 Jun 16
5
They''re killing me (the spammers)
Yes, last night it was 4Mbps the rate of incoming mails. I was wondering if I apply HTB to the following scheme: router -> gw-iface -> MX-server If HTB (new verb) the interface that communicates with MX, say, 2mbit, what will occur to the Input queue of gw-router-iface? Will I still get the link full for 4mbit or will it get lower to 2mbit too, as the inner interface? Appreciate
2004 Aug 06
2
OT spammers was Re:what's happening here?
I appreciate everyone's response. It's glad to see there are others out there... However, I still have seen a number of posts that have gone unanswered and some frustrated users (keyword: users) such as myself. Currently my issues are: Unable to start icecast from init.d (error: "You can run, but you can't hide" repeatedly output until it almost crashes my box) Unable to
2004 Aug 06
2
OT spammers was Re:what's happening here?
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 11:08:08PM +0300, Gavin White wrote: > > Because the aren't many users here, the list is not monitored, > no rules... I guess IceCast as not as big as I thought... and > infested by bunch of lamers that like to take advantage of it > to advertise. > Since it is Sunday and I am in a good mood, I will presume from your languague and attitude that you
2019 Mar 05
0
[PATCH nbdkit] Add new filter for rate-limiting connections.
--- filters/delay/nbdkit-delay-filter.pod | 4 +- filters/rate/nbdkit-rate-filter.pod | 84 +++++++++ configure.ac | 2 + filters/rate/bucket.h | 62 +++++++ filters/rate/bucket.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++ filters/rate/rate.c | 235 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ TODO | 9 +
2008 Oct 26
1
[PATCH 1/1] ocfs2/xattr: Proper hash collision handle in bucket division.v3
Modification from V2 to V3: Use a more pefect code suggested by Joel. Thank Joel for it. In ocfs2/xattr, we must make sure the xattrs which have the same hash value exist in the same bucket so that the search schema can work. But in the old implementation, when we want to extend a bucket, we just move half number of xattrs to the new bucket. This works in most cases, but if we are lucky enough we
2004 Jul 07
12
vorbis 1.1 rc 1 now tagged in SVN
Hi folks, We're gearing up to the next full release of the Vorbis codec; I've just tagged a release candidate in SVN in order to encourage wider testing toward final 1.1 release. This release includes the following updates: 1) Adoption of AoTuV and other tuning work by Vorbis developers outside of Xiph into the mainline codebase 2) New bitrate management code 3) bugfixes In more
2004 Jul 07
12
vorbis 1.1 rc 1 now tagged in SVN
Hi folks, We're gearing up to the next full release of the Vorbis codec; I've just tagged a release candidate in SVN in order to encourage wider testing toward final 1.1 release. This release includes the following updates: 1) Adoption of AoTuV and other tuning work by Vorbis developers outside of Xiph into the mainline codebase 2) New bitrate management code 3) bugfixes In more
2009 May 01
0
[PATCH 1/3] OCFS2: speed up dlm_lockr_resouce hash_table lookups
use multiple pages for the hash table. mainline git commit: 03d864c02c3ea803b1718940ac6953a257182d7a Authored-by: Daniel Phillips <phillips at google.com> Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> -- Index: ocfs2-1.2/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c =================================================================== --- ocfs2-1.2/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c (revision 1) +++
2011 Jul 05
0
Problem in accessing bucket of my AWS S3 account
I tried to establish connection to my aws s3 account like this in my irb console - AWS::S3::Base.establish_connection!(:access_key_id => ''my access key'', :secret_access_key => ''my secret key'', :server => " s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com") And it works well and prompt this - => #<AWS::S3::Connection:0x8cd86d0
2009 Apr 22
1
[PATCH 1/1] OCFS2: fasten dlm_lock_resource hash_table lookups
#backporting the 3 patches at http://kernel.us.oracle.com/~smushran/srini/ to 1.2. enlarge hash_table capacity to fasten hash_table lookups. Signed-off-by: Wengang wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> -- diff -up ./svnocfs2-1.2/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c.orig ./svnocfs2-1.2/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c --- ./svnocfs2-1.2/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c.orig 2009-04-22 11:00:37.000000000 +0800 +++
2005 Sep 06
0
AACPlus Shoutcast v1.90
Yea, don't get me wrong, ogg is definitely an awesome format but aacplus v2 is currently the leader in high fidelity quality at low bitrates. 24kbps aacplus even kicks ass in my view. I hope that this only stimulates even more competitive codecs at dialup speeds. Jay -----Original Message----- From: icecast-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:icecast-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Ross Levis Sent:
2009 Jan 08
1
[PATCH] ocfs2: Access the xattr bucket only before modifying it.
Hi Mark, This is the fix for 2.6.29(introduced by uniting the bucket journal access). Since I found no fixes-for-2.6.29 in your ocfs2.git, it is based on your original upstream-linus. In ocfs2_xattr_value_truncate, we may call b-tree codes which will extend the journal transaction. It has a potential problem that it may let the already-accessed-but-not-dirtied buffers gone. So we'd better