similar to: Blog post about Theora and MSVC assembly

Hello, I write to you for the announcement in this blog: http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=86. I am interested in the open-source solution proposed in this article (the preprocessor-macros solution). Have you solved the problem? Does the offer still stands? Kind Regards, Fernando Pelliccioni. Buenos Aires, Argentina

... and was wondering how it differs from the official libvorbis and why there is need for a fork. Could somebody shed some light on the past and background of the libvorbis/aoTuV story please? Both on- and offlist mails are welcome. Thanks in advance, Sebastian

I mean this one: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/xspf/ It has 6 messages in total. The reason why I think we should kill it is that it potentially confuses people looking the XSPF mailing list. What do you think? Who has is able to such a cleanup task? Sebastian

Any objections to sorting the list of projects on http://xiph.org/downloads/ alphabetically? This is the order that we have currently: libogg libvorbis vorbis-tools libtheora libspeex libflac libao libxspf vorbis-java I can do it if you let me. Sebastian

Hello! I'd like to add the missing link for "TheoraSoftwarePlayers" to the mainpage. I don't feel like asking Ivo for doing Wiki edits every time is a long term solution. Can you give me admin rights for the Xiph wiki? I'd also like to link to the People page from the front page. Any idea what section I should put that link in? Thanks in advance, Sebastian

I just checked out trunk/vorbis to build the latest libvorbis, and noticed an inconsistency in the project settings. For the two build configurations Debug and Release, we have as the Output Directory "$(SolutionDir)$(ConfigurationName)", and the Intermediate Directory "Debug". ("Release" for the Release configuration) However, for the two build configurations

Hello! There is a problem with the current name of the "Xiph license". All the variantions of this name out there imply at least one of these two false assumptions: * that the Xiph license would be a custom license not related to the BSD license at all * that the Xiph license would be based on BSD but is not the same Both is wrong and both hurts Xiph. The license text is

We run an icecast server that several people in Louisville use for audio streaming. A number of people have expressed an interest in video streaming through it, too, but cringe when I talk about setting up a linux server for streaming. Has anyone managed to get streaming working from Windows media encoder using the directshow plug ins? I'd like to be able to tell people they can encode the

I have sent the visual studio project files that compile the speex client to jean-marc directly (as an attachment), sometime this week, I will also upload the binary builds of static library files to my site www.phonestack.com. I am porting our LTP (lightweight telephony protocol) to some embedded systems. I require to run speex in an environment that doesn't support memory allocations. How

Hello! I stumbled upon the blog of Xiph member Arek Korbik [1] a few minutes ago and the "planet idea" came to my mind again. What I mean is a website collection posts from a number of blogs as Planet KDE [2] is doing for example. Is there such a thing for Xiph? Is there interest in having such a thing? If so would there be a chance to cover the domain costs from past/future

I noticed we ship the <debian> folder with at least these libraries: libogg-1.1.3 vorbis-tools-1.2.0 By doing this we take the packaging code out of the Debian diffs where some people might be expecting it. Is this a problem? What benefits do you see in shipping it? Greetings, Sebastian

I have a few thoughs and questions about donating to Xiph that I hop you have a minute for. Here we go: == "Who donated what" list == As it seems we don't have a "Who donated what" list. I thought creating such a list could increase motivation to donate to some parties. What I currently have in mind would be to start listing donations from now on below the current content

I've heard this second hand and haven't had the time to confirm its vericity. Can someone confirm this is the case? If so, what were these people thinking? Removing support for the only video format that is sure to be installed in every Linux box somehow promoves the OS adoption? You get a WTF award LF, congrats. -Ivo

Hi there, I have an elementary question. Although theora can be placed in the same class of codecs as MPEG-1, -2, -4 why is there no greater usage of this codec? On the bigger part of web sites trailers or short videos are encoded with some mpeg codec. Why is theora still so rarely used and unfamiliar although it perfomes very well from my point of view? Is it, because - the whole mpeg family is

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1838 Summary: /proc/self/oom_adj needs to use /proc/self/oom_score_adj Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.6p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at

I got this offlist from someone on the list. This is abuse and should be punished. This didn't anwser my post and was directed to me off-list without invitation. All it was was a promotion. -----Forwarded Message----- From: Dave St John <groups@mediacast1.com> To: drew@drewb.com Subject: Icecast2 and ices Date: 22 Aug 2003 19:22:17 -0600 Hello Drew, saw your post on the xiph list

Hi Rui, Peter, You know I'm enabling the "clang-cl + lld-link" toolchain for Uefi firmware. I meet a problem that the lld-link fails to link 32bits assembly functions, but can link 64bits assembly functions successfully. I need your suggestion. Below is an example to show my problem in linux. The example has two only source files: main.c and foo.nasm. $ cat main.c void Foo (void);

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 1 May 2006, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > >> >> NASM might be the nicer target since it's GNU LGPL and runs on multiple >> OS. Its home page is broken at the moment, but the manual pages work. >> >> http://nasm.sourceforge.net/doc/html/nasmdoc0.html > > That's fine with me. The instructions are in true intel mode now,

Hello > Does anybody have an idea of roughly how much effort is required to make > intel asm printer to be usable? If it is within weeks, probably I can give > it a try. The required efforts equal to ones required to write new assembler. "Too weak to be usable" means "it's not possible to represent many important constructs with masm/nasm/fasm". -- With best

Thanks for Anton's reply. Does anybody have an idea of roughly how much effort is required to make intel asm printer to be usable? If it is within weeks, probably I can give it a try. Thanks, Bengu On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > Hello > > > system native assemlber and linker to generate executables. And it >