similar to: [theora in hardware] Contents of YUV_BUFFER_ENTRY

quite some speed improvement indeed. attached the updated patch to apply to svn/trunk. j -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: theora-mmx.patch.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 8648 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora-dev/attachments/20040824/5a5f2731/theora-mmx.patch-0001.bin

I'm currently doing research and initial development for an app that requires a rather odd usage of some kind of movie decoding. I'm trying to find a codec that I can trick into doing what I want, and so long as I can fix a problem or two, Theora is looking promising. What I want to do goes something like this: 1) Encode a whole bunch of two frame movies. For each movie, the

I'm trying to implement the dct_decoder's LoopFilter function in a FPGA. I need to know what is the maximum memory allocation size which display_fragment and recon_pixel_index_table points. These are fields of PB_INSTANCE structure that is declared in the codec_internal.h Thank you =========================== Leonardo de Paula Rosa Piga Computer Engineering Student Universidade

On 15-Feb-08, at 6:44 AM, ogg.k.ogg.k@googlemail.com wrote: > Well, it doesn't quite work because the second part of the gpos is > an offset, > rather than absolute, and the precision we shed on one, we need to > recover > on the other one, to keep the ability to timestamp events at the > correct > granularity. It would have worked if the second part was absolute

Hello, How to check whether a value object is within a particular basic block or not. I have the following LLVM bytecode: ------------------------ entry: ... %2 = call i32 (...)* @atoi(i8*%1) nounwind ... -- bb1: .. %5 = icmp sgt i32 %2, %i.0 ... ----------------- Here I got the corresponding pointer of the Value object of *%2*. How can I check whether it is defined in *entry* or

Hi there. This patch changes the block selection to quantify error based on the sum of the squared differences of the pixel values rather than the sum of the absolute differences, the former conventionally and statistically seeming like the preferable thing to do. The patch also const'ifies some parameters (which doesn't affect code quality on recent GCCs but might help on older/ other

Hi, I have been working with VP3 for some time now. Dan Miller from On2 just told me about this list. A few months ago, I managed to get On2's VP3 source snapshot to compile under Linux, a feat that many have apparently attempted and quickly abandoned. I compiled a small console app and the results of the experiment are explained here:

I found a bug in theora_decode_init when I was implementing the decoder. theora_decode_init should be zeroing the theora state structure right? memset(th, 0, sizeof(theora_state)); // Erik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora-dev/attachments/20040805/26350ca4/attachment.htm

Zheng Wang wrote: > Hello, > > How to check whether a value object is within a particular basic block or not. > There is a much simpler way to do this. Assuming that Value * pb holds the pointer to the value of %2, you do the following: 1) Check to see if %2 is an instruction (use dyn_cast<Instruction>(pb) and see if the result is NULL). If it's not an instruction,

Estimados usuarios-de-R: Tengo un problema. Si por ejemplo tengo una lista conformada por la serie historia del PBI de 10 paìses. >Tiempo <- seq(1:100) >plot(Tiempo, PP$"Serie 1", type="l",col="1") >lines(Tiempo, PPcapita$"Serie 2") >lines(Tiempo, PPcapita$"Serie 3") >lines(Tiempo, PPcapita$"Serie 4")

Why PCI 3.3V for E1/T1 card!? I can not use it because I can not find any motherboard with PCI 3.3 . Any sugestions!? Cristian VASILIU AccessNET International S.A. Software Programmer mail to :<cvasiliu@accessnet.ro> www:<http://cvasiliu.home.ro>

Hi Everyone, This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending it to this list in the hope that it will reach a largish number of users. I am currently looking at updating some of our advocacy material (which advertises exciting new features like SMP support), and before I do I'd like to get a better feel for why the rest of you are using FreeBSD. If you had to