similar to: Re: Update libtheora-1.0alpha6

Good morning in the Lord Regarding the port of libtheora1.1beta3 for OpenBSD for amd64 and the problem I described at: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora/2009-August/002640.html Attached is a patch for libtheora/patches/patch-lib_x86_mmxencfrag_c I can play videos with it. ?Does it work for you? Best regards -- Dios, gracias por tu amor infinito.

Dear R community I have a question regarding the value of cost complexity parameter "k" used in "tree" package for pruning purpose. Any help in finding the optimum value of "k" is requested. Please give some suggestion in this regard. In the example below i used k=0 but i don't know why? But if i use k=NULL, then it will not plot the resultant tree.

Hello, The description of SYSAPPEND for the DMI information states that the spaces are replaced by underscores, but this replacement does not occur in 6.03. There's small bug present in triplicata in com32/elflink/ldlinux/readconfig.c:copy_sysappend_string(), com32/menu/readconfig.c:copy_sysappend_string(), and core/sysappend.c:copy_and_mangle() prevent proper replacement of spaces by

Just to let people know what my big picture is, I''m trying to write a script that will let me run a program, and name a progeny of that program that I want to debug. My script should find the first occurrence of that progeny, and run it until it finishes initializing the runtime linker, but stop it before it runs any shared library startup routines. (Failing that, I''d be okay

I have recently tried to install continuum. Unfortunately, every time i attempt to install, I get the errors that are at the end of this message. If there is any way that I could get this installer to work, I would be most apreciative of your help. Corey McClymonds ---------------------------------------------------------- fixme:advapi:CheckTokenMembership ((nil) 0x7fdd1ea8 0x7fc1fba8) stub!

Hi all, I am trying to write a D script which would print ustack() for every program in the system receiving SIGSEGV. All the stacks printed in trap()/sigtoproc() context do not have meaningful symbols. The following solves the problem to some degree but I''d much rather have a self-contained D script. dtrace -w -n ''fbt:genunix:sigtoproc:entry/arg2 == 11/ {

We do a get_page() which involves a atomic operation. This patch tries to mitigate a per packet atomic operation by maintaining a reference bias which is initially USHRT_MAX. Each time a page is got, instead of calling get_page() we decrease the bias and when we find it's time to use a new page we will decrease the bias at one time through __page_cache_drain_cache(). Testpmd(virtio_user +

Hi all, We just got a shiny new T5440, and one of the first things I noticed (besides the insane number of hardware contexts), is that dtrace takes 30 seconds to a minute to fire up scripts with 5-6 probes, where our T5220 usually takes under a second. Shutdown is similar, though slightly faster. This is mostly annoying because it takes so long to attach that it''s hard to tell when

On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 16:56 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > My suggestion is to use a recent kernel, and/or eventually backport the > mm fixes if any. > > order-3 allocations should not reclaim 2GB out of 8GB. > > There is a reason PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER exists and is 3 Hmm... it looks like I missed __GFP_NORETRY diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index

On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 16:56 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > My suggestion is to use a recent kernel, and/or eventually backport the > mm fixes if any. > > order-3 allocations should not reclaim 2GB out of 8GB. > > There is a reason PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER exists and is 3 Hmm... it looks like I missed __GFP_NORETRY diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 16:56 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> >> My suggestion is to use a recent kernel, and/or eventually backport the >> mm fixes if any. >> >> order-3 allocations should not reclaim 2GB out of 8GB. >> >> There is a reason PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER

On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 17:47 -0500, Debabrata Banerjee wrote: > >> On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 16:56 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> > >> Hmm... it looks like I missed __GFP_NORETRY > >> > >> > >> > >> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c > >> index 5393b4b719d7..5f42a4d70cb2 100644 > >> --- a/net/core/sock.c >

>> On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 16:56 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> >> Hmm... it looks like I missed __GFP_NORETRY >> >> >> >> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c >> index 5393b4b719d7..5f42a4d70cb2 100644 >> --- a/net/core/sock.c >> +++ b/net/core/sock.c >> @@ -1872,7 +1872,7 @@ bool skb_page_frag_refill(unsigned int sz, struct

>> On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 16:56 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> >> Hmm... it looks like I missed __GFP_NORETRY >> >> >> >> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c >> index 5393b4b719d7..5f42a4d70cb2 100644 >> --- a/net/core/sock.c >> +++ b/net/core/sock.c >> @@ -1872,7 +1872,7 @@ bool skb_page_frag_refill(unsigned int sz, struct

I''m trying to profile the time spent in libc functions in a large build job (building Perl), and I have trouble getting ufunc and func working. (func() is not strictly needed; I was just hoping to use it in order to profile idle time.) Here''s the story. I''ve written a dtrace script to start a separate dtrace process for each invoked command: int fileid;

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:24?AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:19:34 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:16?AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 09:13:48 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >

skb_page_frag_refill currently permits only order-0 page allocs unless GFP_WAIT is used. Change skb_page_frag_refill to attempt higher-order page allocations whether or not GFP_WAIT is used. If memory cannot be allocated, the allocator will fall back to successively smaller page allocs (down to order-0 page allocs). This change brings skb_page_frag_refill in line with the existing page allocation

On 12/17/2013 08:16 AM, Michael Dalton wrote: > skb_page_frag_refill currently permits only order-0 page allocs > unless GFP_WAIT is used. Change skb_page_frag_refill to attempt > higher-order page allocations whether or not GFP_WAIT is used. If > memory cannot be allocated, the allocator will fall back to > successively smaller page allocs (down to order-0 page allocs). > >

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:27PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > skb_page_frag_refill currently permits only order-0 page allocs > unless GFP_WAIT is used. Change skb_page_frag_refill to attempt > higher-order page allocations whether or not GFP_WAIT is used. If > memory cannot be allocated, the allocator will fall back to > successively smaller page allocs (down to order-0 page

On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:25:52PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > skb_page_frag_refill currently permits only order-0 page allocs > unless GFP_WAIT is used. Change skb_page_frag_refill to attempt > higher-order page allocations whether or not GFP_WAIT is used. If > memory cannot be allocated, the allocator will fall back to > successively smaller page allocs (down to order-0 page