similar to: ogg + theora + seeking

Dear all I'm aware that there have been several discussions about the seeking issue and I'm sorry to bring this up again. To solve the problem with Inter-Frame garbage, a seek to the previous keyframe has to be made. The keyframe number should be extracted from the granulepos of the frame where we want to seek to. I hope I understood the theory - unfortunately a few questions have

Can anyone explain how best to go from a dataframe to a table (or better yet a new dataframe) of counts, where the row names in the new table (or dataframe) are the column names of the original df. start w/ DF1 = Pos1 Pos2 Pos3 .... oligo1 G C A oligo2 U U A oligo3 G C C oligo4 C G U oligo5 A A G ..... End with DF2 =

Hi all, I'm building a plot of the values in tmeant (below) against positions 1 to 5, using matplot. tmeant looks like this: case1 case2 pos1 861.8466 818.5909 pos2 961.2841 976.3466 pos3 878.6080 1262.8523 pos4 950.8011 1129.6080 pos5 968.1080 1063.3920 I also have lower (object tl) and upper (object tu) bounds on the confidence intervals as follows: tl: pos1

> No particular answers, but I can at least point out that the way > things were designed for CMML was to work with the existing Ogg > seeking algorithm. The idea is that a generic seeking routine can work > on any Ogg file, as long as it knows the granulepos->time mapping for > the logical bitstreams in the file. That's why all the > timestamp-related info is crammed into

Here's another example of my plotmath whipping boy, the Normal distribution. A colleague asks for a Normal plotted above a series of axes that represent various other distributions (T, etc). I want to use vectors of equations in plotmath to do this, but have run into trouble. Now I've isolated the problem down to a relatively small piece of working example code (below). If you would

Folks have noticed that the documentation is semi-silent about how to properly encode the granule position and interleave synchronization of keyframe-based video. The primary reasons for this: a) we at Xiph hadn't had to do it yet b) there are several easy possibilities, and the longer we had to think about it before mandating One True Spec, the better that spec would likely be. The

Ups! Maybe it's time somebody corrected that statement then - the wiki seems the right place to put the correct algorithm, IMHO. Cheers, Silvia. On Feb 13, 2008 10:06 AM, Ralph Giles <ralph.giles@artifex.com> wrote: > > On 12-Feb-08, at 2:57 PM, Ralph Giles wrote: > > > http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/GranulePosAndSeeking > > I'm not sure it's helpful to

Hi, sorry, there is a bug in the CMML spec and wiki page ... I discussed this with Silvia earlier this week but haven't gotten around to correcting it yet. CMML granulepos is much like theora's; the previous granule is stored in the higher bits, and the delta since then is stored in the lower bits. The current timestamp is the sum of the two. This is the behavior of the implementations

OK... i've come across a problem trying to get the granule pos of the start of the page... it's not so crucial with single stream ogg files... but now that i have theora+vorbis in a file, i'm finding that when i seek to a position, i have no way to determine the relative offsets of the different streams at the new seek point and hence the av is out of sync. So given a page, is it

> The advantage of storing this in the granulepos field itself, like > theora and CMML do, is that the seek code may already understand how > to handle the back pointer. Right now everything assumes the mapping > is from 'initialized decoder' + 'granulepos from page header' => > timestamp, or in the case of theora and CMML => 'timestamp' + 'last

David Flynn has proposed a new Ogg Dirac mapping. The draft is here: http://davidf.woaf.net/dirac-mapping-ogg.pdf This is a much bigger break from other codecs than my draft (at http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggDirac). We talked a bit about it on IRC today. Below is my summary; hopefully David can correct anything I got wrong or misleading. Comments? There are two main differences

Hi, I have a question about seeking. In fact, it's more or less a kind of rambling and thinking aloud, circling around a question. I've been wondering how to deal with seeking in a stream, and what to do when seeking in the middle of a set of active events (eg, when several bits of text are supposed to be shown, but you seek after the time when they are first shown, and before the time

I've spent three days tracking this bug down.. I have yet to find how to fix it in the code, tho I do have a workaround which proves the nature of the bug. Sorry for the somewhat-overkill nature of explaining this bug, but some people have been doubting it so I'm going to give the evidence nessesary to prove the nature of it. If you send page-aligned data to libshout (via shout_send) it

I've spent three days tracking this bug down.. I have yet to find how to fix it in the code, tho I do have a workaround which proves the nature of the bug. Sorry for the somewhat-overkill nature of explaining this bug, but some people have been doubting it so I'm going to give the evidence nessesary to prove the nature of it. If you send page-aligned data to libshout (via shout_send) it

After trying to find out what to do when no packets complete on a page... i reread the ogg spec and found this... "A special value of -1 (in two's complement) indicates that no packets finish on this page." So i searched through a few files and it appears that the muxer doesn't do this... has this been depracated ? In all cases i can find that this happens the page has the same

Hi, do you still think you need all this, if you are allowed to have equal granulepos on subsequent pages? Conrad. On 18/02/2008, ogg.k.ogg.k@googlemail.com <ogg.k.ogg.k@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've now got another way of encoding granule (oh, not *again*, I hear > you cry). I believe it's an improvement over the existing "generic" > method, so

Hi all, > One problem I see with your proposed implementation is that it does not > specify how audio and video would be synchronized, since there are no > absolute time stamps for the video frames. So it is difficult to account > for > audio latency on different systems, much like when you play an AVI file. > Ideally it would be wonderful to have timestamps that could be used

Hi, I am continuing to try to debug my ogg/theora decoder. The issue seems to be that not enough packets are being pulled from the bitstream, here is some sample output from my player with some debugging comments put in: (playback began at first frame, this is from the middle of the clip) get page at 1765027 got packet frame++, skip is 0 frame decoded page processed, kframe=414 : offs=442 get

> It is more complex, because the granulepos is available at the page > level. Ah. Good point, I always forget about the partial page problem :( I conveniently flush pages after each data packet in my case (due to unknown/arbitrary latency), so I tend to forget easily about those. > We've generally designed the seeking algorithm so it can be > implemented without looking inside

Question: is it permissible to put more than one frame packet into a page? At 30 fps, Ogg page overhead is on the order of 8 - 10 kbits/sec. At low datarates, this is going to be unacceptable. If I shove a few frames into a page, how does this affect the granulepos stuff? ___ Dan Miller (++,) Founder, On2 Technologies <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/