similar to: TMDA whitelisting anti-spam filter installed

Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of "subscribe". Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your mailer's "Reply" feature. icecast+confirm+1076405509.4977.3d207b@xiph.org Rather than allow only list subscribers to post to Xiph.Org mailing lists,

icecast@xiph.org wrote: > Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. > We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of > "(no subject)". > > Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your > mailer's "Reply" feature. > > icecast+confirm+1053014484.2633.87372b@xiph.org > > Rather than

Hi, It is a shame I feel obliged to write this email. I sent a single email with a possible bug in it, asking if it was working in a newer release. I got 3 spam emails from mindrot.org. Two asking me to confirm, and then when I was forced to confirm I got another auto-responder spam. If I had wanted the 3rd spam I would have set "return receipt". I got this (below) auto-responder

Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of "RE: [icecast] directory servers". Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your mailer's "Reply" feature. icecast+confirm+1037921402.17606.bab310@xiph.org Rather than allow only list subscribers to post to Xiph.Org

Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > I have an entire /8 blacklisted. The problem is there is a single IP in > it I want to exempt from this. Searching the web site, I note there > used to be (circa version 1.3) a whitelist feature, but I couldn''t find > a simple solution to what I want to do. > > What would be the bes/easiest way to accomplish this? I can''t think of a

Hi vorbis! Ezt írtad Wednesday, April 16, 2003, 4:22:39 PM perckor: vxo> Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. vxo> We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of vxo> "Re: [vorbis] Re: OGG in RIFF-WAVE (encoding with MSACM)". vxo> Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your vxo> mailer's

what anti-spam for you used ? dspam?spammassian? amavisd-new ? what is best ?

I'd also like to point out that, when setting up a linux container with _just_ the lxc tools available in ubuntu, all that was needed to be done was whitelist the appropriate cgroups for the Android devices. The lxc tools seem to create the appropriate character devices when you detach/attach the Android device via USB, and the Android `adb` tool recognized the devices. So, a tangential

I looked at the 1.3 whitelist documentation and realized that the ops example, while interesting in and of itself, did not do what I think a whitelist does. Back to symmetry, if a blacklist is a list of sites not allowed to connect in through the fire wall, maybe to a web server, for example, then a whitelist should be a list of machines that are allowed to access a service or services, again,

Dear Friend, I done configuration using RBLSMTPD with WHITELIST, but I don't know it is correct. Please check files below are corrects. Thanks Adriano === FILE WHITELIST.DOMINIO.RBL. ==== $ttl 900 whitelist.dominio.rbl. IN SOA host1.xxxxxx.com. root.xxxxx.com. ( 2006112002 ; serial; 3600 ; refresh period (1 hora); 900 ; retry time (15 minutos); 1800 ; expire tiem (30 minutos); 900 ;

I'm trying to figure out how to use firewalld on CentOS 7 to block access to ssh (on a custom port to control log bloat) and smtp submission except for specific source addresses, using ipset. I haven't been able to figure out how to combine a port number or service name with an ipset, either as a blacklist of nets or a whitelist of addresses. It looks like ipset with type of

This adds support for whitelisting the acceptable options in the "refuse options" setting in rsyncd.conf. It introduces "!" as a special option string that refuses most options and interprets any following strings as patterns of options to allow. For example, to allow only verbose and archive: refuse options = ! verbose archive The "!" does't refuse no-iconv,

Hi, I am trying to use shorewall as a way for authenticated network access. I read about dynamic black lists, but is there a way to do dynamic white lists? I''ve looked through the doc, but couldn''t find it. Also, could someone please assist me on creating a rule so that all other failures (ie. the mac is not in the whitelist), requests get forwarded to a certain ip and port (so

Heya folks First of all, sorry if this isn't the correct list, but yet, I think spam is a kind of network attack and should be treated as a security issue.. I run a working mail server using Postfix, MySQL, Courier-IMAP, SpamAssassin and ClamAV (amavisd-new) .. I've checked the configuration file for SpamAssassin, but yet I havn't find any good solution for spam.. Sure, spam will

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Instead of a blacklist, why not a whitelist? Given the size of LangRef, > you're bound to leave something out of your blacklist that needs to be > there (also, future additions to LLVM IR will need to be added to the > blacklist; are you sure you can catch *all* of them?). A whitelist seems >

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > >> Instead of a blacklist, why not a whitelist? Given the size of LangRef, >> you're bound to leave something out of your blacklist that needs to be >> there (also, future additions to

Can you see the USB device in the lxc? My answering assumes you cannot see the USB device in the container. If you can see it, please ignore my answer. According to my understanding, “hostdev mode='subsystem' “ is used with KVM only. We use this if we want to passthrough a device to a KVM virtual machine. After doing that, the host machine will lose control of the device. If container is

Hi, I'm using virsh to instance a VM in my environment, but I'm running on some issues. I created the following domain file: <domain type='kvm'> <name>demovm</name> <uuid>4a9b3f53-fa2a-47f3-a757-dd87720d9d1d</uuid> <memory unit='KiB'>4194304</memory> <currentMemory

Thanks. That's exactly what I needed. However I have a permission problem. I added the parameter to 90-sieve.conf and created the directory but now I get the following permissions errors in maillog even though I have the file and directory wide open with 777 permissions: Error: yY/0JHtauVQfPgAAU+Cu/Q: sieve: failed to open sieve dir: stat(/var/lib/dovecot/sieve/after.d/) failed: Permission

Hello, When new users are added we start them with a spam rule that routes spam to their junk folder. I don't see a way to assign priority ... so how does a user whitelist a spam-flagged email? Are the rules applied in some order? Alphabetically perhaps? If so I can name the spam rule z-spam. Thanks in advance.