similar to: rsync without POSIX ACLs

>From what I can gather from googling, using rsync over ssh without a cipher is not possible since some changes to the openssh package. ?Is this true? ?I have been using a CPU friendly cipher but feel that it is best to use no cipher at all (secured network). rsync -avxu --progress -e 'ssh -c arcfour128' /path/to/source/ user at server:/path/to/destination/ Thanks in advance!

Hey folks, I did some googling on this but did not come up with much. I'm using rsnapshot which uses rsync, and I notice some pretty long pauses in the xfers as you can see on this graph from "munin". THe machine in question right at the moment is doing nothing but rsyncing ( rsnapshoting ) some 12T of NAS storage to local disk, so there is nothing else going on at all.

So the short summary of my problem is, the batch file rsync creates is HUGE for a very small change. The idea is to create workstation image with partimage, update it with some software and send the image update diff over the wire to a large number of destinations over a satellite link, but the batch file updates are several orders of magnitude too large. I don't know exactly how partimage

Hi All, I have machine M1 hosting Samba PDC. It stores only user information. I have machine M2 acting as KDC server. I have machine M3 hosting CIFS shares and it joins into the domain hosted by PDC M1. I have machine M4 used as CIFS client. On M2, I have added users and cifs/host service principals for M3. Also added service principal in keytab file. I have added all the user and service

Group, I'm having trouble convincing rsync to read and apply ACLs to files as root or otherwise. Googling, reading the source and docs have not helped so far. I always seem to get the error message sys_acl_get_tag_type(): Unsupported attribute value (124). Our rsync version is fairly recent, I'm using a jfs2 filesystem, and I'm using a very simple test case (see

Hello, We currently have a scenario where a large percentage of inbound calls on a telco PRI are intended for professors who aren't currently in their offices/at their desks. My question is, is anyone actively using the Asterisk "RLT" (Release Link Trunking) feature to bounce these sorts of calls back to the telco? The idea being to forward the call to their mobile phone without

''cause it doesn''t... This is an issue for nested custom matchers, ie: module CRFT class RFT def initialize(args) blah end def matches?(target) "Yeah, baby!" end end def r_f_t(args) RFT.new(args) end end module CRLT class RLT include CRFT def initialize(args) blag end def matches?(target)

Hi, I am using rsync 3.0.4 on a WinXP machine (with CygWin) to synchronize my files to a RedHat Linux server. Everything is working perfectly, but there is one thing I do not understand. Apparently there is a difference in pushing and pulling files with rsync. When I push my files to the server with this command, I see one rsync process on my WinXP machine, just as expected rsync -rlt -e

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- Executing: rsync.exe -v -rlt --delete "/cygdrive/C/Documents and Settings/User/Local Settings/Application Data/Identities/{DFF16927-88E6-4EAA-A097-460B7E65289B}/Microsoft/Outlook Express/" "localhost::Backup/Outlook Express/" building file list ... done ./ Deleted Items.dbx rsync:

I have not been able to get two B-channel transfer to work on DMS100 PRI. I consistently get the following errors: [Nov 6 11:12:49] ERROR[2774]: chan_zap.c:8178 zt_pri_error: ROSE RETURN ERROR: [Nov 6 11:12:49] ERROR[2774]: chan_zap.c:8178 zt_pri_error: OPERATION: RLT_OPERATION_IND [Nov 6 11:12:49] ERROR[2774]: chan_zap.c:8178 zt_pri_error: ERROR: RLT Not Allowed I have tried on two

I am using deltacopy (uses rsync) to backup up a drive in windows vista to a freenas server. Before moving to vista, had the system working fine (on a windows xp machine). The command used for the backup is: rsync.exe -v -rlt -z --delete "/cygdrive/F/TXT/" "nas::160d/_Acer_F/TXT/" As a result of this command, rsync should create a dir (not on nas) and then copy some files

Hi, I'm using cwrsync with rsync 3.0.8 atm and after syncing a file to Strato HiDrive and back to the local machine the new permissions contain this entry: None (UK-DT-01\None) with Read, Execute; Read and Write (allowed) permissions. It takes a few seconds before this entry is displayed with this name, in the meantime it is only a sid (and the user icon has a red question mark in the

Hi Guys, I am sorry if my issue is not related to this but I think it is. I have a PRI with Bell Canada and when I dial in and have the call transfered to a context to dial out and then have those two channels bridged, the call disconnects with cause 16 just exactly as Jay R. Ashworth shows in his CLI output. Bell Canada support RLT or know as 2BCT or TBCT to some but we have not requested that

Imran Hussain writes Tue Dec 6 19:54:06 GMT 2005 > I have written an rsync wrapper for Windows called DeltaCopy. > (http://www.aboutmyip.com/AboutMyXApp/DeltaCopy.jsp). It is > written in Borland C++ Builder and source is also available on the > net. Let me know if someone has any suggestions/comments. Hello Imran, I have a Windows PC running Vista Family Premium Edition SP2. I

I am running a windows xp machine and running the latest version of rsync, i am using a naslite server that is the rsync server, when I run the following commands to copy data from my xp machine to my nas it will copy the data the first time but if i pick up email and then run the command again it will freeze with a error, But if i just use a folder that has say my downloads in and i alter a file

When I'm running "rsync --compare-dest" on a local Linux volume (ext4) it works as expected (duplicate files not created) however when same commands with same options are run on NTFS USB drive (in my scenario below mounted to /share/external/sdt5) all the files are copied regardless if they have been updated or not. I have spent many hours trying to figure out what could be wrong and

Hi, I have a major problem with permissions on files that are rsynced from Strato Hidrive to a local machine (Win 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 German). The permissions for the source file (e.g. an executable like: Xshell.exe) are: Everyone with Full control (inherited from the root of drive D:) Now I sync that file to the destination machine (Strato HiDrive) with:

Samba Team Releases Samba 4.0 ============================= December 11th 2012. The Samba Team is proud to announce the release of Samba 4.0, a major new release of the award-winning Free Software file, print and authentication server suite for Microsoft Windows clients. The First Free Software Active Directory Compatible Server

Samba Team Releases Samba 4.0 ============================= December 11th 2012. The Samba Team is proud to announce the release of Samba 4.0, a major new release of the award-winning Free Software file, print and authentication server suite for Microsoft Windows clients. The First Free Software Active Directory Compatible Server

Told you it was too complex of an issue :-) I figured to do this in zapata.conf and all is fine now: transfer=no That was the magic two letter which was sending a request for RLT feature on the line. Set transfer to "no" and all worries gone. Thanks for the input everyone. -Bruce On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:10 PM, bruce bruce <bruceb444 at gmail.com> wrote: > Futher check