similar to: how to run MCMC with binomial distribution

Hello all, could you tell wehere I can find information related to MCMC (Monte Carlo). And some examples about this topic. Thanks, Tania [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I implemented the Beta binomial distribution following the patterns of the binomial distribution code and inspired by JAGS' code [1]. I have studied the code carefully but it's my first run in the R internals. Can somebody review the code and if everything it's ok commit to the repository? [1]

Hi folks, I have a question about how to efficiently produce random numbers from Beta and Binomial distributions. For Beta distribution, suppose we have two shape vectors shape1 and shape2. I hope to generate a 10000 x 2 matrix X whose i th rwo is a sample from reta(2,shape1[i]mshape2[i]). Of course this can be done via loops: for(i in 1:10000) { X[i,]=rbeta(2,shape1[i],shape2[i]) } However,

Am trying to do some study on bivariate binomial distribution. Anyone knows if there is package in R that I can use to calculate the density function of bivariate binomial distribution and to generate random samples of it. Thanks, -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/How-to-calculate-density-function-of-Bivariate-binomial-distribution-tp992002p992002.html Sent from the R help

Dear R-users, I'm running a lmer model using the lme4 package. My dependent variable is dichotomous and I'm using the "binomial" family. The results are slightly different from the HLM results based on a Bernoulli distribution. I read that a Bernoulli distribution is an extension of a binomial distribution. Is that right? If so, how can I adapt my R model to a Bernoulli

Hello, I have written a simple Metropolis-Hastings MCMC algorithm for a binomial parameter: MHastings = function(n,p0,d){ theta = c() theta[1] = p0 t =1 while(t<=n){ phi = log(theta[t]/(1-theta[t])) phisim = phi + rnorm(1,0,d) thetasim = exp(phisim)/(1+exp(phisim)) r = (thetasim)^4*(1-thetasim)^8/(theta[t]^4*(1-theta[t])^8) if(runif(1,0,1)<r){ theta[t+1] = thetasim }

I am using a binomial mixture model to estimate abundance (N) and detection probability (p) using simulated count data: -Each site has a simulated abundance that follow a Poisson distribution with lambda = 5 -There are 200 simulated sampled sites -3 repeated counts at each site - only 50 percent of the animals are counted during each count (i.e, detection probability p =0.5, see codes) We removed

Package: mcgibbsit Title: Warnes and Raftery's MCGibbsit MCMC diagnostic Version: 1.0 Author: Gregory R. Warnes <gregory_r_warnes at groton.pfizer.com> Description: mcgibbsit provides an implementation of Warnes & Raftery's MCGibbsit run-length diagnostic for a set of (not-necessarily independent) MCMC sampers. It combines the estimate error-bounding approach of Raftery

Package: mcgibbsit Title: Warnes and Raftery's MCGibbsit MCMC diagnostic Version: 1.0 Author: Gregory R. Warnes <gregory_r_warnes at groton.pfizer.com> Description: mcgibbsit provides an implementation of Warnes & Raftery's MCGibbsit run-length diagnostic for a set of (not-necessarily independent) MCMC sampers. It combines the estimate error-bounding approach of Raftery

Hello, I have quite a tough problem, which might be able to be solved by MCMC. I am fairly new to MCMC (in the learning process) - so apologize if the answer is totally obvious, and any hints, links etc are greatly appreciated. I'll illustrate the problem in a version cut-down to the essentials - the real problem is ways more complex. Suppose I have a Markovian series of poisson

Hi Rneters, I'm running a GLM model with a full factorial design in blocks and binomial error distribution. I would like to have the F values for this model but I got a message that "using F test with a binomial family is inappropriate in: anova.glm(model, test = "F")". Should I not report F statistics on this kind of analysis? I would appreciate any comment on this.

Dear R-list, I thought that I would let some of you know of a free R package, glmm.ADMB, that can handle mixed models for overdispersed and zero-inflated count data (negativebinomial and poisson). It was built using AD Model Builder software (Otter Research) for random effects modeling and is available (for free and runs in R) at: http://otter-rsch.com/admbre/examples/glmmadmb/glmmADMB.html I

I need to estimate the parameters for negative binomial distribution (pdf) using maximun likelihood, I also need to estimate the parameter for the Poisson by ML, which can be done by hand, but later I need to conduct a likelihood ratio test between these two distributions and I don't know how to start! I'm not an expert programmer in R. Please help -- View this message in context:

I have been running a Gibbs Sampler to estimate levels of efficiency in the Louisiana Shrimp Industry. I created a matrix (samp) where I stored the results of each iteration for 86 variables. I run 10,000 iterations. So, the matrix samp is 10,000 x 86. I want to use the gelman-rubin test to check for convergence. To do that, I need at least two chains. If I run second chain with different starting

Hi, Im carrying out some Bayesian analysis using a binomial response variable (proportion: 0 to 1), but most of my observations have a value of 0 and many have very small values (i.e. 0.001). I'm having troubles getting my MCMC algorithm to converge, so I have decided to try normalising my response variable to see if this helps. I want it to stay between 0 and 1 but to have a larger range

Dear list, I am using glm's to predict count data for a fish species inside and outside a marine reserve for three different methods of monitoring. I run glms and figured out the best model using step function for each methods used. I predicted two values for my fish counts inside and outside the reserve using means of each of the covariates (using predict() ) therefore I have only one value

I tried thinning of the mcmc run with 500,000 iteration. It looks like 100 or 200 is enough to remove the autocorrelation of a1 and tau. Is that too much thining? --- On Tue, 3/16/10, ping chen <chen1984612 at yahoo.com.cn> wrote: > From: ping chen <chen1984612 at yahoo.com.cn> > Subject: an ordinal regression MCMC run high correlation > To: r-help at r-project.org >

Greetings glmmADMB function users, I am trying to run a series of models using the glmmADMB function with several different distribution families (e.g., poisson, negbinom). I am using a Optiplex 790 PC with Windows 7, 16.0 GB of RAM and a 64-bit operating system. I am running R version 2.15.0 and started out using the most recent version of glmmADMB (I believe version 7.2.15). My data is zero

Dear R-users (and developers), I am looking for an efficient framework to carry out parameter estimations based on MCMC (optionally with specified priors). My goal is as follow: * take ANY R-function returning a likelihood-value (this function may itself call external programmes or other code!) * run a sampler that covers the multidimensional parameter space (thus creating a posterior

Hey everyone, I've been reading an old scientific paper (well, not that old, about 15 years) and I want to verify the authors' statistical results. The paper is fairly unclear about what exactly they did, and none of the relatively simple commands I'm familiar with are producing results similar to theirs. The data is dose-response, recorded as binomial data: structure(list(X1 =