similar to: Rtools216.exe on Windows

A new version of the Windows batchfiles is available. CHANGES The key change is the new R.bat utility. R.bat has a new interface and extended functionality covering many of the other prior utilities. (These older utilities are no longer needed and have been removed.) Unlike R.bat which requires no configuration the new Rpathset.bat utility is configured by manually changing the Windows batch

A new version of the Windows batchfiles is available. CHANGES The key change is the new R.bat utility. R.bat has a new interface and extended functionality covering many of the other prior utilities. (These older utilities are no longer needed and have been removed.) Unlike R.bat which requires no configuration the new Rpathset.bat utility is configured by manually changing the Windows batch

batchfiles is a set of batch, javascript and HTML Application files that are useful for running R and associated programs on Windows. Version 0.6-0 updates them for the new architecture specific directory structure in R 2.12.0 . A few of the lesser used utilities have been dropped. Each batchfile is self contained. To install just place all or just any that you wish to use anywhere on your

batchfiles is a set of batch, javascript and HTML Application files that are useful for running R and associated programs on Windows. Version 0.6-0 updates them for the new architecture specific directory structure in R 2.12.0 . A few of the lesser used utilities have been dropped. Each batchfile is self contained. To install just place all or just any that you wish to use anywhere on your

I am getting this error message when I try to run Rcmd SHLIB myprog.c. There appears to be a missing / between etc and i386 in the path. I am on Windows Vista and am using R version 2.12.1 Patched (2010-12-16 r53864) and just downloaded Rtools 2.12 today. Is this a bug in R? How can I resolve this? C:\tmp2>Rcmd SHLIB myprog.c cygwin warning: MS-DOS style path detected:

Hi, I can't seem to install R from source. I've downloaded the latest Rtools211.exe from http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ & done a full installation of that and Inno Setup. I have set R_HOME as C:\R (and also tried using C:\R\R-2.11.1) After successfully running 'tar xf R-2.11.1.tar.gz' the modifications I have made and saved as MkRules.local are: BUILD_HTML =

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > This is not a bug, it's a feature. > > It stops me from distributing versions with unintentional uncommitted > changes. It does have that effect, but the error messages are pretty obscure: c:\Rtools\MinGW\bin\windres.exe: rcico.rc:9: syntax error and Error on line 12 in e:\R\R-svn\r-devel\src\gnuwin32\installer\R.iss: Value

> When installing packages containing code to compile, R eventually calls > R CMD SHLIB. Same thing happens with inline C++: it gets stored in a > temporary file, compiled into a *.dll using R CMD SHLIB and then loaded > using dyn.load(). > > Write the following into a file named hello.c: > > #include <R.h> > #include <Rinternals.h> > SEXP hello(void) {

Dear all I am trying to build a package, and get the error message: ""packaging into .tar.gz failed"". I have also installed the same package directly from a locally created zip file. In this case, the package is put correctly under C:\R\R-2.15.0\library. However, when I check the package, I get another error message, stating "ERROR: compilation failed for package".

Dear developers, I am trying to run some C/ Fortran code in R. Although I have experience with that in Windows (Vista) 32 bit, I could not succeed in 64 bit. I downloaded the following: - R 2.12.0 - Rtools 212 - miktex 2.9 - inno setup 5 -Afterwards, I changed the path as: ?C:\Program Files\R\R-2.12.0\bin;C:\Rtools\bin;C:\Rtools\MinGW64\bin;C:\Program Files\HTML Help Workshop;C:\Program Files

Multiple people have now reported that the R installer does not build with InnoSetup 6 (released last week). The inno log shows this error: Error on line 12 in src\gnuwin32\installer\R.iss: Minimum NT version specified by MinVersion must be at least 6.0. (Windows 2000/XP/Server 2003 are no longer supported.) Compile aborted. Hence to fix this, the "MinVersion" parameter in

I am receiving this message during Rcmd check proto-3.9.2.tar.gz using "R version 2.13.0 Patched (2011-04-25 r55638)" * checking installed package size ...Error in if (total > 1024 * 5) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed Execution halted I don't get this under R.2.12.x. The size of the tar.gz file is under 600K. What causes this or if its too hard to tell from the

Hello all, I'm trying to build R 32bit from source in a Windows 64 machine. I have followed the steps in "R Installation and Adiministration" ( http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#Getting-the-source-files) or at least I think I did everything described. I am not sure if I have installed the libjpeg, libtiff and libpng files though. I have upzipped them in the

Also why should that difference result in different behavior? On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 9:38?AM Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck at gmail.com> wrote: > > In that case identical should be FALSE but it is TRUE > > identical(a1, a2) > ## [1] TRUE > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:58?AM Deepayan Sarkar > <deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >

This is not a bug, it's a feature. It stops me from distributing versions with unintentional uncommitted changes. Duncan Murdoch On 29/04/2008 2:30 PM, bill at insightful.com wrote: > Full_Name: Bill Dunlap > Version: 2.8.0dev > OS: Windows XP > Submission from: (NULL) (70.98.76.47) > > > I tried for the first time to build R from source on Windows, where I > got

On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 09:41, Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck at gmail.com> wrote: > > Also why should that difference result in different behavior? That's justifiable, I think; consider: > d1 = data.frame(a = 1:4) > d2 = d3 = data.frame(b = 1:2) > row.names(d3) = c("a", "b") > data.frame(d1, d2) a b 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 1 4 4 2 > data.frame(d1,

Full_Name: Bill Dunlap Version: 2.8.0dev OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (70.98.76.47) I tried for the first time to build R from source on Windows, where I got the source code via svn. Per the Installation and Administration manual, I altered src\gnuwin32\MkRules so it had the the locally correct paths to HTML Help Workshop and Inno Setup 5. I also set USE_SVNVERSION=yes, as suggested

I am working on compiling R-3.6.0 for Windows 10 64bit using rtools40 (beta 11). I had also installed the most recent update of Inno setup, which is now 6.0.2.With that version, `make risntaller` fails at the call to ""C:/R/Inno/iscc" R.iss > R-3.6.0.log 2>&1" and just exits, pointing to line 175 of the makefile which is: $(RPREFIX)-win.exe: R.iss

In that case identical should be FALSE but it is TRUE identical(a1, a2) ## [1] TRUE On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:58?AM Deepayan Sarkar <deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com> wrote: > > They differ in whether the row names are "automatic": > > > .row_names_info(a1) > [1] -3 > > .row_names_info(a2) > [1] 3 > > Best, > -Deepayan > > On Tue, 14 Nov

One would normally want the original order that so that one can stack a list, operate on the result and then unstack it back with the unstacked result having the same ordering as the original. LL <- list(z = 1:3, a = list()) # since we can't do s <- stack(LL,. drop = FALSE) do this instead: s <- transform(stack(LL), ind = factor(as.character(ind), levels = names(LL))) unstack(s)