similar to: Gluster and public/private LAN

I just installed glusterfs-swift 3.3.1 on a couple of Fedora 18 servers. This is based on swift 1.7.4 and has keystone in the config. I had experimented with the one based on swift 1.4.8 and tempauth and had some problems with it. The HOWTO I can find is still for the old one. Is there an updated one? I would also need to find some instructions on setting up keystone from scratch for

I'm starting a new thread on this, because I have more concrete information than I did the first time around. The full rebalance log from the machine where I started the rebalance can be found at the following link. It is slightly redacted - one search/replace was made to replace an identifying word with REDACTED. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97770508/mdfs-rebalance-redacted.zip

In IRC today, someone who was hitting that same IB performance ceiling that occasionally gets reported had this to say [11:50] <nissim> first, I ran fedora which is not supported by Mellanox OFED distro [11:50] <nissim> so I moved to CentOS 6.3 [11:51] <nissim> next I removed all distibution related infiniband rpms and build the latest OFED package [11:52] <nissim>

I was running the previous version of UFO, the 3.3 one that was based on Swift 1.4.8. Now there is a 3.3.1 based on Swift 1.7.4. The config that I used last time to enable S3 isn't working with the new one, just updated yesterday using yum. I was using tempauth in the old version and I'm still using tempauth. I have a CentOS 6 system and a Fedora 18 system with UFO on them. The

Hello, I would like to find out the topology of an existing volume. For example, if I have a distributed replicated volume, what bricks are the replication partners? Fred -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20121114/b203ea91/attachment.html>

Hi, I've got Gluster error: Transport endpoint not connected. It came up twice after trying to rsync 2 TB filesystem over; it reached about 1.8 TB and got the error. Logs on the server side (on reverse time order): [2012-12-15 00:53:24.747934] I [server-helpers.c:629:server_connection_destroy] 0-RedhawkShared-server: destroyed connection of

Dear gluster experts, We're running glusterfs 3.3 and we have met file permission probelems after gluster volume rebalance. Files got stick permissions T--------- after rebalance which break our client normal fops unexpectedly. Any one known this issue? Thank you for your help. -- ??? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

We are about to abandon GlusterFS as a solution for our object storage needs. I'm hoping to get some feedback to tell me whether we have missed something and are making the wrong decision. We're already a year into this project after evaluating a number of solutions. I'd like not to abandon GlusterFS if we just misunderstand how it works. Our use case is fairly straight forward.

Hi, Any ops here? irc channel seems broken. Ta, Andrew

On 5/9/2018 10:15 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > It's been about three weeks since I asked this question.? All the > information I have available says that all users have no limits on > virtual memory, so it must be dovecot itself that sets the limit.? Can > that be changed in the 1.2 version?? I can't upgrade to 2.x yet. > > Here's an actual syslog entry, redacted to

Hi Guys, I have a rebalance that is going so slow it may never end. Particulars on system: 3 nodes 6 bricks, ~55TB about 10%full. The use of data is very active during the day and less so at night. All are CentOS 6.3, x86_64, Gluster 3.2.6 [root at node01 ~]# gluster volume rebalance data01 status rebalance step 2: data migration in progress: rebalanced 1378203 files of size 308570266988

I am messing around with gluster management and I've added a couple bricks and did a rebalance, first fix-layout and then migrate data. When I do this I seem to get a lot of failures: gluster> volume rebalance MAIL status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures status --------- -----------

Hello, Thanks to "partner" on IRC who told me about this (quite big) problem. Apparently in a distributed setup once a brick fills up you start getting write failures. Is there a way to work around this? I would have thought gluster would check for free space before writing to a brick. It's very easy to test, I created a distributed volume from 2 uneven bricks and started to

Hello Everyone, I am using Zabbix to monitor my Dovecot server, and my logs are filled with lines like this: > Oct 21 15:04:46 osaka dovecot[1256]: pop3-login: Aborted login (no auth > attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured, > session=<bWd0nr14SuF/AAAB> > Oct 21 15:05:29 osaka dovecot[1256]: imap-login: Aborted login (no auth > attempts

Hi all, I'm pretty new to Gluster, and the company I work for uses it for storage across 2 data centres. An issue has cropped up fairly recently with regards to the self-heal mechanism. Occasionally the connection between these 2 Gluster servers breaks or drops momentarily. Due to the nature of the business it's highly likely that files have been written during this time. When the

Greetings, One of the best things I've seen at conferences this year has been a bookmark distributed by the RDO folks with most common and/or useful commands for OpenStack users. Some people at Red Hat were wondering about doing the same for Gluster, and I thought it would be a great idea. Paul Cuzner, the author of the gluster-deploy project, took a first cut, pasted below. What do you

Hi All, 3.4.0 and 3.3.2 releases of GlusterFS are now available. GlusterFS 3.4.0 can be downloaded from [1] and release notes are available at [2]. Upgrade instructions can be found at [3]. If you would like to propose bug fix candidates or minor features for inclusion in 3.4.1, please add them at [4]. 3.3.2 packages can be downloaded from [5]. A big note of thanks to everyone who helped in

----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "Andrew Holway" <a.holway at syseleven.de> To: "Alex Jia" <ajia at redhat.com> Cc: kvm at vger.kernel.org Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 4:24:33 PM Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] vm pxe fail Hello, On Aug 17, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Alex Jia wrote: > Hi Andrew, > I can't confirm a root reason based on your information, perhaps

I have a machine with my mail service on it running Debian Squeeze. The version of dovecot on that server is 1.2.15. I'm building a new server with Ubuntu 18.04 (started with 16.04, upgraded in place), where the dovecot version is 2.2.33. I plan to migrate all my services to this new machine. The virtual mailboxes are on disk in maildir format, with accounts in a mysql database managed by

i use solr fts indexing. It worls very well but it have one database per system, not per user. Lets suppose i delete one or more e-mail users in system. How to remove them in solr database to reclaim space?