similar to: (S4) Neither AXFR nor authoritative nameserving available?

Hello, I have dns zone domain.com configured on nsd server. If a try #dig axfr @localhost domain.com then i receive correct answer, but if i try #dig a @localhost domain.com then i received nothing but should be 127.0.0.1 How can i troubleshoot this problem? output: [root at ns1 ~]# dig axfr @localhost domain.com ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1-RedHat-9.8.3-2.P1.fc15 <<>> axfr

Hello! I use NSD 4.7.0 self compiled: Configure line: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --includedir=${prefix}/include --mandir=${prefix}/share/man --infodir=${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --disable-option-checking --disable-silent-rules --libdir=${prefix}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu --runstatedir=/run --disable-maintainer-mode --disable-dependency-tracking

Hello all, This is with Samba 4.0.0rc6 with the built-in DNS server. Found the problem in Samba 4.0.0rc5 originally, then updated to see if bug had been fixed between rc5 and rc6. I am trying to get mail working for a subdomain that is being managed by Samba 4. I added an MX record, but the problem here is that the Samba 4 DNS server isn't replying with the record:

I have just set up a new AD and am having a little success with it, but DNS resolution is a little slow. I'm looking into why that is and tried an ns lookup for google.com and got the answer SERVFAIL on my AD server. The query was then passed to my next nameserver (google's own dns), which handled the query. Is this correct behaviour? I've not seen SERVFAIL before itadmin at

I have a Samba 3.5 server that services seven Windows 7 computers. When the setup was originally installed, all workstations were independent systems and so all users had local administrative privilege. I have removed admin rights from all users but one. This user has a problem. We'll call the user 'dmc' though that isn't his real username. In any event, dmc is a member of the

I think it?s the cache. When you where sleeping the cache got updated. But I can be wrong Philip > On 5 Sep 2020, at 12:35, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 05/09/2020 09:53, Peter Pollock via samba wrote: >> I have just set up a new AD and am having a little success with it, but DNS >> resolution is a little slow. >> >>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have set up Samba-3.0.11 to retrive account information from W2k server via winbind, and it works. But is takes about 10 sec. to retrive the information. I have dumped some traffic from the request, and it looks like this: A lot of these: 21:21:55.133423 172.20.3.131.1077 > 172.20.3.130.137: NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; UNICAST

There seems to be a problem with my local dns server resolving mirror.centos.org. I know something about dns but obviously not enough to figure out what might be wrong here or how to fix this in bind configs. The SERVFAIL errors below seem to be related to AAAA and MX queries for the domain. Please advise. TIA. # host mirror.centos.org 8.8.8.8 Using domain server: Name: 8.8.8.8 Address:

Hello all, I have a Samba 4 system setup with 4.0.0-rc5 working as an Active Directory controller for a set of seven Win7 computers, and most things are working. However, file shares are not. In all cases, if I add users to Domain Admins, they can access the shares. In all cases, if users are not in Domain Admins, they cannot access the shares. I've added users to groups that

Hello, we encountered a problem with registry nic.at for tld .at and their transaction "BillWithDraw". This transaction allows an registrar to delegate authority back to registry. For a successful use of this transaction all nameserver-entries for the zone will be deleted by our application before nic-order will be sent to nic.at. Nic.at now checks all nameserver for existing

Am 23.07.24 um 17:28 schrieb Jeroen Koekkoek via nsd-users: > NSD 4.10.1rc2 pre-release is available: no compile time warnings while building on debian bookworm/x86_64 > @bilias implemented mutual TLS authentication for zone transfers. > Please consult the nsd.conf manual for details on the newly introduced > configuration options tls-auth-port and tls-auth-xfr-only. this is an nice

The DNS for www.voip-info.org seems to be non-responsive. Is there a mirror of this invaluable resource site? Tx, Steve dig www.voip-info.org ;; Got SERVFAIL reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, trying next server ; <<>> DiG 9.4.1-P1 <<>> www.voip-info.org ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 61402 ;;

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 # # logcheck (1.2.64) unstable; urgency=low # # * ignore.d.server/bind: # - moved "[bind] query $FOO denied" rule to violations.ignore.d # (closes: #443881). # - added bind's "AXFR ended" rule alongside "AXFR started" # (closes: #445046). # - added "adding an

On 07/09/15 21:26, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Is there some option on the slave to set the frequency of the AXFR? > Say every hour? > > On 09/07/2015 03:45 PM, Lars Hanke wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> yes it does work. But the DLZ bind will not notify any slaves, when >> the repository changes. This can be painful, especially for longer >> TTL values.

Hi, I have a query regarding running a manual update of nsd via: # nsdc update My NSD server is accepting notifications from two servers. From my nsd.conf: # master 1 allow-notify: X.X.X.X NOKEY request-xfr: AXFR X.X.X.X NOKEY # master 2 allow-notify: Y.Y.Y.Y NOKEY request-xfr: AXFR Y.Y.Y.Y NOKEY Are both servers sequentially queried each time

Hi Robert, yes it does work. But the DLZ bind will not notify any slaves, when the repository changes. This can be painful, especially for longer TTL values. Regards, - lars. Am 07.09.2015 um 20:16 schrieb Robert Moskowitz: > > > On 09/07/2015 12:52 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I am looking at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_administration >> >> I am using

Recently I'm getting these errors on my slave when adding new domains: Sep 26 13:48:27 hosting named[1668]: zone wholesaletvtime.com/IN: refresh: unexpected rcode (SERVFAIL) from master 207.218.174.4#53 The master/slave transfers work for the other 1000+ domains that I have, just not the handful of new ones that I just added after the CentOS 4.3 -> 4.4 upgrade. I regenerated the

Im using centos 4.5 and bind 9.2.4-27.0.1.el4, im having a problem propagating updates on domains. when i update the main NS the secondary and tertiary doesn't update automatically. i need to delete the <domain>.zone file in the secondary and tertiary to get update from the main NS. I don't where's the problem i don't get any errors i just dont get the AXFR when the don't

I have bind running on two servers. Both servers are running bind-9.2.4-7. When I update a zone file on the primary and reload bind, the secondary receives a notify, but does not initiate an AXFR. The only way I can get the secondary to update is to delete the zone file on the secondary and restart named. Any ideas what might be wrong? Mike

There seems to be an issue with DNS: > nslookup llvm.org ;; Got SERVFAIL reply from 192.168.178.1, trying next server Server: 192.168.178.1 Address: 192.168.178.1#53 ** server can't find llvm.org: NXDOMAIN -- AlexDenisov Software Engineer, https://lowlevelbits.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: