Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Non-dovecot user looking for feedback"
2006 Sep 29
3
Converting UW MBX mail folder
We converted from uw-imapd to dovecot but are still having
problems with MBX mail folders.
The user can't access this "MBX mail folder":
[root at volt Resume's]# file "Sys Admin"
Sys Admin: MBX mail folder
[root at volt Resume's]# mailutil copy ./"Sys Admin" '#driver.unix/new'
Can't open mailbox ./Sys Admin: no such mailbox
[root at volt
2006 Sep 14
4
Migrating from uw-imapd to dovecot
We recently switch from up-imapd to dovecot
But many users are reporting that they cannot access certain mail folders.
The log file has:
imap(dws): Sep 14 00:06:19 Error: File isn't in mbox format:
/home/research/dws/mail/TaskDL
The files in the logs are "MBX mail folders", not "ASCII English
text" as are the folders that can be read under Outlook.
Can anyone tell me
2003 Feb 17
2
Re: [bincimap] Re: Re: bincimap
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
> >> It even recently included a POP server. What's the reasoning there?
> >Someone wanted it so it'd be easy to run both POP3 and IMAP servers
> >without having to configure them twice. I don't see any harm in it
> >anyway, it took only few hours to write, it's optional and doesn't take
>
2004 Feb 10
2
Mailbox formats
I'm currently using mbox and mbx with UW-IMAP, mbox for space efficiency
and mbx for folders with lots of messages for time efficiency without a
large space cost. I've avoided maildir because it has a relatively high
space cost; mbox has no inter-message cost while maildir wastes on average
half a sector plus an inode for each message.
What other formats are there, and has anyone come
2007 May 22
1
simultaneous access to folder
We have for many years been a UW-IMAP site, with users having their own
traditional, private, mbox-format INBOX and folders: almost (but not
quite) no complications of shared or simultaneous access. We have just
completed a transparent transition to dovecot (official 1.0.0 release).
But we have one residual issue affecting one important user account.
UW-IMAP specifically only allows single
2004 Jan 29
2
Migrating from UW: mbx detection and conversion
I want to migrate my big mail folder hierarchy in preparation for converting
from UW-IMAP to Dovecot. I've got a bunch of mbx format folders but some
remain mbox. Has anyone done this? Any scripts out there for automating the
conversion to all-mbox?
I believe the only format conversion available is mailutil (part of UW-IMAP)
and it works by opening an IMAP connection to the server and moving
2005 Sep 06
3
Misbehavior with Dovecot and Mulberry
I'm having a bit of misbehavior wherein Dovecot seems to refuse to
cooperate with my Mulberry MUA. By and large, everything works great.
I can move mail back and forth happily. I can compose a note and copy
the outgoing mail to my Dovecot "Sent" folder using my default Mulberry
settings. But if I reply or forward a mail, I get a Mulberry error popup
saying that it
2005 Dec 13
4
Hi everyone .. need some pro-dovecot arguments :-)
Hi,
i never used dovecot so far, but i heard a couple good things about it
.. for one the debian maintainer of the exim package recommended it :-)
so i want to change our mailserver (currently using ipop3 and uw-imap)
to dovecot ... now my boss seems to favour cyrus.
i could use some good arguments for dovecot, also your experiences with
it and with other mailservers so i can make a
2005 Aug 30
1
Multiple mailbox formats, per-user mailbox format support
Hello,
I have a setup where each user has different mailbox
formats (some use only /var/spool/mail/user) mailbox format,
some is stored in mbx format ~/INBOX or ~/mbox and
some is stored in maildir format in ~/Mail/
I currently use UW-IMAP to read /var/spool/mail/... and the mbx format
mailboxes in ~/INBOX and mutt to read ~/Mail/... (the maildirs in ~/Mail/
are created by procmail rules)
Does
2003 Aug 06
1
thinking seriously about converting
to dovecot from UW imap. I think I will go all the way to maildir while I'm at
it. I was having performance problems with mbox format files and converted to
mbx but it's not really yielding a huge performance gain. Deletes and moves are
still rather slow at times. my mailboxes are typically 2000 to 5000 messages.
I've scanned the mailing lists a bit and picked up some hints on
2007 Aug 20
3
UW-IMAP to Dovecot conversion - How to migrate the folders?
Hi all,
I've read so much information on this that I'm a little confused as to
what to follow. Here's what's going on:
We just migrated away from our AIX machines which were running Postfix
and UW-IMAP. We're now running Postfix with Dovecot. I already
converted everyone's mbox file to maildir, but now I'm having a little
troubles with how to exactly populate
2004 Oct 21
2
migration to maildir and arrival time
Hello.
I am currently testing dovecot (0.99.10.8, Debian woody from backports),
with the maildir storage.
I have noticed that when I use the mailutil tool from uw-imap
distribution to transfer my IMAP mailboxes from our current server
(uw-imap, mbx format) to the dovecot one, the mails arrival time are
apparently lost. I can see this in Pine, using the Arrival sort: the
mailboxes on the
2006 Apr 22
2
Plan/Status of MBX support?
Hi, All,
I've been happy user of dovocot as far. It is easy to
configure, reliable and secure. Hat off to all developers
who make this possible!
I know dovecot is on the mailbox format front, it supports
both mbox and maildir format well, and is developing and
experimenting a new flexible format, dbox.
But is there any plan to add mbx (i.e., indexed mbox
format) support, to complete
2020 Jan 21
2
Using dsync for a single mailbox?
Is it possble to use `doveadm sync` to migrate a single mailbox? I'm
migrating accounts from another IMAP server,and most of the mailboxes
are in mbox or maildir format, but a few are in MBX. As far as I can tell
the only recommended way to "convert" an MBX mailbox is to sync it via
imap. But dsync fails in inscrutable ways, and the documentation is kind
of scant on how to control
2003 Jan 11
2
0.99.6rc3
Well, "release candidate" wasn't really right name for last two
versions. Maybe not for this one either, it has a few changes that could
potentially break things badly (new hash table code especially). Anyway,
seems to work with me. If I don't see any problems with it for a few
days it'll be the final.
The really great news is that we support threading. A lot of people have
2006 Apr 17
2
Question about mail storage
I am in the throes of trying to understand all the issues of
transforming an old UW Imap server with mbox (I think) INBOX format
running sendmail and procmail serving 3500 users to dovecot and maildir
format. Currently, the folders are under ~/mail and the INBOXes are
under /var/spool/mail.
If I understand correctly, the typical default Dovecot/maildir format
installation will have both the INBOX
2012 Sep 09
1
ChgrpNoPerm issue
I have dovecot version 2.0.9
I am confused about this article
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Errors/ChgrpNoPerm
my mail_location =
mbox:~/mymail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
So my inbox is at var/mail/ and my
imap folder is /home/user/mymail
The problem is /var/mail (Owner is
useraccount and the group us mail) , and here comes the problem
Dovecot
keeps trying to chown the imap folder inside the
2005 Aug 23
2
Weird internaldate behavior with 1.0-test80 and mbox folder
Has anyone else encountered weird date behavior with mbox-style folders?
I am nearly ready to bite the bullet and convert my UW imap hierarchy
(which is in mbx format) to Dovecot. In so doing, I need to convert each
UW-specific mbx-format mailboxes to the more portable mbox format, which
Dovecot can read. (This is done with the 'mbxcvt' utility that's part of
UW.)
I am then
2018 Jun 21
5
Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd)
At Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:42:50 +0200 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote:
>
> On 21.06.2018 19:28, Robert Heller wrote:
> > Are there any imap daemons (besides cyrus-imapd). cyrus-imapd is appearently
> > not compatible with postfix + procmail. I need an imap daemon that will work
> > with a postfix + procmail system.
> >
> the problem seems to
2004 Aug 24
2
Just installed with Fedora 2
I just upgraded my RH9 installation to Fedora 2.
To my surprise, imapd seems to be gone from the core.
I noticed there are now two IMAP servers docevot and cyrus.
After reading brief descriptions of both, dovecot would seem to be more
compatible with my setup.
Especially since I'm using mbox's.
I have 2 questions.
It seems like dovecot does not support mailboxes inside of a