similar to: WRITE_FPDMA_QUEUED CAM status: ATA Status Error

Hello, I am setting up a new (remote) server. I initially installed 9.2 RC4 amd64 because that's what the data center put in the drive for me. Shortly thereafter I downloaded 9.2-STABLE sources and compiled world and a generic kernel. While doing so the system became unreachable by SSH The SSH sessions appeared to connect but there was never any data returned. I could telnet to port 22

Hi... I really hope that somebody can help me to brainstorm this problem. Please let me describe my enviornment. Environment --------------- Fedora 16 x86_64(fully up-to-date) Wine 1.5.1 32bit and noarch binaries only Nvidia GPU - GTS 450 Nvidia Driver - 295.40 (including 32bit libraries) I've installed Perfectworld International under wine. Everything was running fine until the most recent

Hi, I was trying to rebuild world on a FreeBSD 10 test system, that I had just installed. ZFS root was setup. I let the installation program do all the ZFS setup and configuration. I put root on a 5 disk encrypted raidz array. Besides the installer configuring 5 times the amount of swap space I asked for (asked for 8gb, installer put 8gb on each drive, for 40gb in total.) everything was working

I recently put together a new machine w/ a SuperMicro H8SCM and an AMD Opteron 4228 HE... I've having an issue where the clock on the machine skips around... The wierd part is that it's very sudden when it happens... ntp sometimes brings it back, but it can't when the clock gets too far ahread (1000 seconds), ntp dies... In order to catch it happening, I ran a sleep 60 loop

Hi All, I am running quantile regression in a "for loop" starting with 1 variable and adding a variable at a time reaching a maximum of 20 variables. I get the following warning messages after my "for" loop runs. Should I be concerned about these messages? I am building predictive models and am not interested in inference. Warning messages: 1: In

Hello. I am a beginer in R and I can not implement the KhmaladzeTest in the following command. Please help me!!!!!!!!!!! PD: I attach thw results and the messages of the R program R : Copyright 2006, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.3.1 (2006-06-01) ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R es un software libre y viene sin GARANTIA ALGUNA. Usted puede redistribuirlo bajo ciertas

Dear Sir/Madam, I am encountering one of those alien computer momements one finds every so often in life. See the sequence below: > fish3.fis <-read.csv("emperor2.csv", check.names = TRUE, strip.white = TRUE) > colnames(fish3.fis) [1] "Month" "Year" "FishingArea" "SumOfTotalCatch" "CPUE" [6]

I'm not used to using smartd, but have a new set of systems that don't have any sort of RAID on them, so I enabled smartd (18 systems 4 SATA drives each). Running CentOS 5.4 64-bit .. One of them has emailed me twice(despite it saying it would only email me once) saying it has 1 Offline uncorrectable sectors But when I try to find more information, smartctl seems to think everything is

On 19/03/18 14:01, Morgan Read wrote: > Hello list > > I've been running the following command, first in fc20 and then now > (since the beginning of March) in fc26: > now=$(date +"%Y%m%d-%H%M"); sudo rsync -ahuAESX -vi /home/ > /run/media/readlegal/Backup/home > > /run/media/readlegal/Backup/rsync-changes_$now > > Since the move to fc26, this

I've got a 1Tb USB disc that appears to be dying - eg it took about 10 days (!) to run 'badblocks -nsv /dev/sdc' and it only did less than 2% in that time. Read access became _really_ slow. So there's definitely something amiss and I've got it offline. There's no drama about the content as I have other backups and I'm resigned to junking the thing, but I'm curious

Il 17/01/2016 19:36, Alessandro Baggi ha scritto: > Il 17/01/2016 18:46, Brandon Vincent ha scritto: >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Matt Garman >> <matthew.garman at gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'm not sure what's going on with your drive. But if it were mine, >>> I'd want >>> to replace it. If there are issues, that long smart check

Hello there, I've got a question about SATA. I've got ASUS P5GC-MX/1333 with ICH7. (SATA2 support) A few HDD with SATA2. system: uname -a FreeBSD diablo.miekoff.local 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #1 r246666: Tue Feb 12 00:19:07 MSK 2013 root at diablo.miekoff.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DIABLO64 amd64 camcontrol info camcontrol iden ada2 pass2: <ST3500320AS SD1A> ATA-8 SATA 2.x

Il 24/10/2016 14:05, Leonard den Ottolander ha scritto: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:07 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === >> SMART Error Log not supported > > I reckon there's a <snip> between those lines. The line right after the > first should read something like: > > SMART overall-health self-assessment

I've seen similar cases where a USB drive appears to fail but the SMART reports success. The most recent was a 500 GB disk which had internally a Seagate Barracuda SATA drive. It appeared to work well until I sent it a largish (7GB) tarball. As well as SMART I ran a surface check and exercise, all passed. The tar kept failing. I can't test further, the disk has been broken up for

Hi, I am using FreeBSD 8.2 and went to add 4 new disks today to expand my offsite storage. All was working fine for about 20min and then the new drive cage started to fail. Silly me for assuming new hardware would be fine :( The new drive cage started to fail, it hung the server and the box rebooted. After it rebooted, the entire pool is gone and in the state below. I had only written a few

Il 27/10/2016 19:38, Yamaban ha scritto: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:25, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> Il 24/10/2016 14:05, Leonard den Ottolander ha scritto: >>> On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:07 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === >>> > SMART Error Log not supported >>> >>> I reckon there's a

quantreg package is used. *fit1 results are* Call: rq(formula = op ~ inp1 + inp2 + inp3 + inp4 + inp5 + inp6 + inp7 + inp8 + inp9, tau = 0.15, data = wbc) Coefficients: (Intercept) inp1 inp2 inp3 inp4 inp5 -0.191528450 0.005276347 0.021414032 0.016034803 0.007510343 0.005276347 inp6 inp7 inp8 inp9 0.058708544

Hi All, I am fairly certain that this disk is failing in my server, and I am replacing it straight away anyway. However, I'd appreciate the views of the list just to be sure as I value your opinion(s). I got these errors, once only so far, in /var/log/messages. This disk has / on it. Oct 5 08:34:47 server1 kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x7 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Oct 5 08:34:47

Hi, Could you please explain what is non-positive fis error? I have been trying to use quantile regression (rq) procedure and I keep ending up with this error. I haven't been able to find an explanation for the same. Best Regards, Arti Arti Mann Ph.D. Student Department of Information Systems W.P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University Email : Arti.Mann at asu.edu

On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:25, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 24/10/2016 14:05, Leonard den Ottolander ha scritto: >> On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:07 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === >> > SMART Error Log not supported >> >> I reckon there's a <snip> between those lines. The line right after the >> first