similar to: Physically extracting P-value from TukeyHSD test output

Hi all, I am statistically confused tonight. When the assumptions to a random effects estimator are warranted, random effects should be the more efficient estimator than the fixed effects estimator because it uses fewer degrees of freedom (estimating just the variance parameter of the normal rather than using one df for each included fixed effect, I thought). However, I don't find this to be

Dear all, I am trying to export my fixed effect results to Latex. I am using the plm package with the summary function. However, it does not look like apsrtable, stargazer, or any other package can accompany using the plm package. I am interested in a classic table with the coefficient in one row followed by the standard error in paranthesis in the next row and stars by the coefficient to show

Scanner: MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 Problem description: Email data: MessageID: <200605311020.k4VAKUu12436 at dsi-fe1.dsi.unifi.it> From: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch To: nesi at dsi.unifi.it Cc: Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Scanning part [] Scanning part [letter.zip] Attachment validity check: passed. Virus identity found: W32/MyDoom-O Virus identity found:

Hi,everybody! When the system boot,there is a problem: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions:line 19 /sbin/consoletype:cannot execute binary file /etc/profile.d/lang.sh:line 46: /sbin/consoletype:cannot execute binary file it cannot boot! How can i fix it? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking