Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "libnutconf: An overview"
2012 Dec 10
0
UPP schedule and progress
Hello everybody,
so, here's the summary of my progress (note that it also includes a few items
to discuss, so I'm cc-ing this to nut-upsdev as well).
I. The planning:
1/ libnutconf:
The core (i.e. config. classes and their (de)serialisers) is coded, UT in progress.
Signalisation shall follow; I have a couple of practical thoughts & comments to this,
see below.
In general, I'd
2012 Dec 07
0
libnutconf: (De)serialisation methods added
?Hello everybody,
(de)serialisation methods of all the currently existing config. classes
were pushed to balooloo/nut, libconf branch:
https://github.com/balooloo/nut/commit/df8b584c7fef71741b33bff11a482a103360250e
Please note that the deserialisation methods should work, however
they are quite inefficient since they simply read the whole stream to memory
and then call parseFromString. I guess
2012 Dec 11
0
libnutconf: Basic UTs for libnutconf pushed
?Hello everybody,
basic UTs for libnutconf were pushed to balooloo/nut,
libconf branch:
https://github.com/balooloo/nut/commit/f453459419abf6c597d5d186494f91ed6f0e81aa
Note that the tests are not exhaustive; however, they
test the most prominent (sample) configuration settings
(de)serialisation.
The code should also give you an idea about how to write
a simple configuration manipulation program
2012 Dec 14
0
NUT IPC module of libnutconf pushed
?Hello everybody,
1st (and yet incomplete) version of IPC support module for libnutconf
was pushed:
https://github.com/balooloo/nut/commit/0fbf351b5ee9899bd89cf17314727c69c2d5471c
The code contains lots TODO; I commit it mainly because I'll be off
on holiday for some time, so you may review and I might perhaps
work on it a little bit if I get extremely bored... ;-)
As always, any comments,
2012 Dec 04
1
libnutconf: specific C++ accessors technique proposition
?Hello fellow developers,
yesterday, I was thinking about how to implement specific config.
attributes accessors in section-based nut config. files so that
it's nice to use and consistent with NutConfiguration, UpsmonConfiguration
and UpsdConfiguration config. classes (where it's done via Settable attributes).
The GenericConfiguration class provides generic access to name/value
items of
2012 Oct 12
2
NSS support in trunk (was: NSS branch pull request)
2012/10/12 Emilien Kia <kiae.dev at gmail.com>
> Hi guys,
>
Hi Emilien and the list,
This is a pull request to finally merge NSS feature in nut trunk:
> https://github.com/clepple/nut/pull/3
>
I'd like to take a moment to shed some more light on this important
development, which lasted 3 years:
- the initial
2012 Oct 29
1
Nut-upsdev Digest, Vol 88, Issue 22
?Hello everybody,
just a few notes to the doxygen X man issue:
1/ AFAIK doxygen can generate man pages, so why don't
we just generate them and decide then whether they
are ill fitted or usable...
2/ I'd definitely use doxygen when possible; I mean I don't
know any alternative that's able to do (at least partial)
validation of the documentation with the source
3/ I
2015 Apr 11
0
Roadmap to 2.7.3
On Apr 8, 2015, at 9:44 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> wrote:
> - #190: upsd: NSS SSL only working in debug mode => NEED TESTING before merging
> Emilien has made a fix and PR (#199: Initialize SSL after deamonize and downgrade to user.)
> The user (Melkor Lord) has ack'ed the fix.
> The fix is indeed trivial but I want to ensure that there is no
2015 Apr 08
2
Roadmap to 2.7.3
Hi Charles and the list
here is an update on 2.7.3
2015-03-20 3:33 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:
> On Mar 19, 2015, at 2:00 PM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> * #158: the branch has been collapsed into one commit, but additional
>> documentation (nut-names.txt) is needed:
>>
2015 Apr 13
2
Roadmap to 2.7.3
Hi Charles,
2015-04-11 21:22 GMT+02:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 9:44 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> - #190: upsd: NSS SSL only working in debug mode => NEED TESTING before
> merging
> Emilien has made a fix and PR (#199: Initialize SSL after deamonize and
> downgrade to user.)
> The user (Melkor
2015 Apr 28
1
make environment for automated testcases
2015-04-27 15:02 GMT+02:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:
> On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:48 AM, Nick Ma. <nick.mayerhofer at enchant.at> wrote:
>
> > But it still doesn't compile any executable: ~/nut/tests% ls
> > cpputest.cpp example.cpp Makefile Makefile.am Makefile.in
>
> I think it is only intended to produce an executable when running "make
2015 Mar 20
2
SSL only working in DEBUG mode
Some precisions:
we are not alone, some projects had similar problem:
http://bugs.bitlbee.org/bitlbee/ticket/785
And the problem is really coming from NSS initialization. Discussion about
the issue here : http://osdir.com/ml/mozilla.crypto/2002-08/msg00016.html
There is a workaround to use NSS with fork but it is more setting a flag to
share some resources (primarily sockets) but must
2015 Mar 26
3
SSL only working in DEBUG mode
2015-03-26 9:03 GMT+01:00 Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com>:
> Hey mister M'
>
> A first huge thanks for taking care of this, and so late in the night. I
> know that it's not easy...
>
> (sent from my S3... please excuse my brevity)
> Le 25 mars 2015 18:49, "Emilien Kia" <kiae.dev at gmail.com> a ?crit :
>
> >
> >
>
2006 Feb 27
1
Errors after building 3.0.21b on AIX 5.2
I have seen a lot of recent posts about building on AIX 5.2, 5.3, etc.
but none showed the same problems I am having.
After building Samba 3.0.21b on AIX 5.2, I get this error when running a
number of the binaries:
> ./testparm
exec(): 0509-036 Cannot load program ./testparm because of the following
errors:
0509-130 Symbol resolution failed for /usr/lib/libc.a(posix_aio.o)
because:
2010 Nov 25
3
Announce: new team member (to work on Mozilla NSS port)
Dear fellows,
As you have probably seen, NUT has had a recent boost through the help of
Eaton.
Frederic Bohe (contractor for Eaton France) has worked on Augeas, and is now
working the Windows port.
Chetan Agarwal, seconded by Prashi Gandi (both from Eaton India) are working
on XCP and quality / validation related projects.
I'm now pleased to announce that Emilien Kia (contractor for Eaton
2015 Mar 26
0
SSL only working in DEBUG mode
Hey mister M'
A first huge thanks for taking care of this, and so late in the night. I
know that it's not easy...
(sent from my S3... please excuse my brevity)
Le 25 mars 2015 18:49, "Emilien Kia" <kiae.dev at gmail.com> a ?crit :
>
>
>
> 2015-03-21 17:06 GMT+01:00 Melkor Lord <melkor.lord at gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015
2012 Nov 10
1
libnutclient pull request
Hello all,
I come back to request comments (and merge) on my pull request of the
libnutclient.
https://github.com/clepple/nut/pull/2
All previous comments have been addressed (some fixes and documentation).
For memory, the libnutclient is an high-level C++ and C client library
allowing to dialog with upsd. The addressed model is oriented around
devices, variables and commands; unlike
2015 Mar 25
5
SSL only working in DEBUG mode
2015-03-21 17:06 GMT+01:00 Melkor Lord <melkor.lord at gmail.com>:
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Emilien Kia <kiae.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Some precisions:
>>
>> we are not alone, some projects had similar problem:
>> http://bugs.bitlbee.org/bitlbee/ticket/785
>> And the problem is really coming from NSS initialization. Discussion
2024 Apr 29
1
RFE to extend "LISTEN" directive to support host-colon-port (as single token)
Cheers all,
A recent discussion in the issue tracker brought up the idea to allow the
`LISTEN` keyword to also accept a single "host:port" token (e.g. if there
is only one argument, with at least one colon, and the last colon is
followed only by numbers, split it into host and port) :
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2424
I see certain pros to the idea (may be more
2024 Apr 29
1
RFE to extend "LISTEN" directive to support host-colon-port (as single token)
Cheers all,
A recent discussion in the issue tracker brought up the idea to allow the
`LISTEN` keyword to also accept a single "host:port" token (e.g. if there
is only one argument, with at least one colon, and the last colon is
followed only by numbers, split it into host and port) :
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2424
I see certain pros to the idea (may be more