similar to: IMAP instead of Maildir on Ubuntu Precise

I ran dovecot -a and the blizzard of data seemed ok to my limited knowledge. Is there another log I should look into to trace this error down? Dovecot and system info: thufir at dur:~$ thufir at dur:~$ dovecot --version 2.0.19 thufir at dur:~$ thufir at dur:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04.1

Hello everyone, I tried to set-up balsa email program(ver 1.2.0) in such a way that the files(draftbox, sentbox, inbox, outbox and trash) resides on a smbfs mount-point. This mountpoint is mounted with the correct uid,gid and the permissions are set correctly. Usually I'm able to send mails, but occasionally I tried to click on all the five folders upon launching the program and then try

To use dovecot-postfix stack with thunderbird, do I put the configuration into /usr/share/dovecot/protocols.d/impad.protocol? That would seem to be how the stack is configured. "Thunderbird To use with Thunderbird, edit the file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf: protocol imap { ... login_greeting_capability = yes imap_client_workarounds = tb-extra-mailbox-sep }"

I want to iterate ?nodes? and ?leafs? for a yaml document: thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ ruby user.rb user.rb:6: undefined method `[]'' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from user.rb:5:in `each_key'' from user.rb:5 thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ ruby user2.rb user2.rb:5: undefined method `[]'' for

Looking at: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=10591 What are the steps to install this application? Yes, it's a garbage application, but I'd like to at least give it a go. Looks like msiexec apparently isn't the right approach. Should that be through wcmd instead? thufir at ARRAKIS:~/.wine/drive_c$ thufir at ARRAKIS:~/.wine/drive_c$ msiexec

What's the difference between user "123" and "devries"? Based on the output here, they seem the same..? tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip show users Username Secret Accountcode Def.Context ACL Forcerport 201 password 201 default No Yes 123

On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:46:13 -0500, Andres wrote: > A "sip set debug on" will give you more info on why you are getting the > 404. It probably has to do something with your context/dialplan. on tleilax: tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip set debug on SIP Debugging enabled tleilax*CLI> on doge: thufir at doge:~$ thufir at doge:~$ sudo sipsak -vv -s sip:devries at

Can I dial directly from the asterisk console with the Dial() application? or, is channel originate preferred: channel originate SIP/thufir extension 18003569377 at outbound thanks, Thufir

ok, that's really all I need to know. Of course, if anyone else wants to throw in their two cents, don't let me stop you :) -Thufir On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Frank Vanoni <mailinglist at linuxista.com> wrote: > I'm currently using Asterisk 11.7.0 on a Raspberry Pi 2 Model B with > Ubuntu Server 14.04. > > Works fine! :-) > > Frank > > On Wed,

On 22/03/15 03:03, thufir wrote: > On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:33:13 -0500, Brian Franklin wrote: > >> If your phones support PoE, >> >> I have had huge success with Zyxel: >> http://www.amazon.com/ZyXEL-ES1100-16P-16-Port-Ethernet-Unmanaged/dp/B00 >> 5GRETMM/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1426296572&sr=8-3&keywords=zyxel+poe >> >> If you want to go

Hi, I **think** that I have user of thufir101, because I get a 200 response below, but I also get a 404. It seems to depend on how I send the ip address/fqdn? tleilax*CLI> tleilax*CLI> sip show users Username Secret Accountcode Def.Context ACL Forcerport 201 password 201 default No Yes

when running asterisk -r, is there a way to turn off the messages? I didn't find the answer in the man page. thanks, Thufir

If your phones support PoE, I have had huge success with Zyxel: http://www.amazon.com/ZyXEL-ES1100-16P-16-Port-Ethernet-Unmanaged/dp/B00 5GRETMM/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1426296572&sr=8-3&keywords=zyxel+poe If you want to go even cheaper, I have successfully used these as well: http://www.amazon.com/TRENDnet-8-Port-100Mbps-Switch-TPE-S44/dp/B000QYEN

I would be very interested in using sipsak for something like this. What have you tried so far? -Thufir On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Olivier wrote: > Thinking over my previous, I wonder if sipsak could be used to send > outgoing SIP NOTIFY messages. > Would both Asterisk and sipsak be able to share networks resources ? > > Thoughts ? > > 2017-01-16 14:10 GMT+01:00 Olivier

Pardon, this might be off-topic. I'm reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_switch For a setup of ~5 agents, would I be wrong in thinking that a generic 16 port unmanaged switch would fit the bill? The first model to come up for me in an Amazon search is: http://support.netgear.com/product/fs116 Is this a reasonable choice? Would I be wrong in thinking that most any Fast

I'm debating between a cloud PBX or, perhaps, rasberry pi. For a SOHO, maybe three hardphones, rasberry pi would suffice? I would be amazed, but, if so, great. thanks, Thufir -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20160706/84a0ac7c/attachment.html>

I'm testing Asterisk at home, crummy connection. Skype works fine for me, but every SIP client, even without using Asterisk, fails to connect. That's ok. Is swapping out SIP for Skype a big deal? Heh, well, I guess it's dead: http://www.digium.com/en/products/software/skype-for-asterisk If I have a really bad connection, can I "downgrade" SIP somehow? I

I'm looking at the <http://support.a-link.com/phonemate/IPU1.htm> phone because it works with Skype (from Linux), but can do SIP, too. Not necessarily asterisk related, but possibly. My networking situation might require IAX if I'm running Linux and want to use SIP, I'm not certain (Skype works fine). Putting that unknown aside for the moment, how does this phone work under

On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 08:32:26 +0530, Mitul Limbani wrote: > READ READ READ .... I know, I have the 4th edition and I've been reading it. Personally, I find it more general than specific, but I'll go back through that chapter, absolutely. thanks, Thufir

with func_odbc, in the definitive asterisk guide, they were suggesting the possibility that part, or perhaps all of, the dialplan could be written as SQL statement!? First off, that sounds like a good idea to me, but the tone of the authors was suggesting not so much, but that it was a personal preference. >From a naive perspective, why SQL statements at all? Why not just database config