similar to: Bug#631102: #631102 and #679533.. related?

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: grave File: xen Justification: renders package unusable Debian Squeeze Dom0, up to date. Networking is handled by OS scripts, such that br0 and br1 are bridge interfaces. Without warning, the DomU (Ubuntu 10.04 LTS) loses inbound connectivity. It tends to happen after several hours. It doesn't seem to be affected by throughput

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-5.2 Hi, We're seeing weird behaviour regarding network traffic between a Xen dom0 and domU. I reported this issue yesterday to the openvswitch-discuss mailing list, but it seems this could also be a (regression?) bug in the xen hypervisor or the linux kernel... (we've upgraded xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 4.0.1-4 -> 4.0.1-5.2 and

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.1.2-3 Severity: normal When configurating a duplicate custom vifname for interfaces in the Xen dom0 that are added to a bridge (which is obviously a configuration error), the hotplug scripts fail silently to rename the new vifX.0 to the custom vifname, if it's already existing. The result of this, is that the domU will start normally, but no network

retitle Traffic forwarding issue between Xen domU/dom0 thanks This week again this bug occurred again so we are trying to create some kind of reproduce algorithm. First we've created two virtual machines named koekiemonster.bofh.hq.mendix.net and netappsim.bofh.hq.mendix.net. We've added 29 vifs to koekiemonster.bofh.hq.mendix.net. During this tests we've always had a ping

Whoops, that patch is obviously missing an extra line containing a fi statement. Fixed version attached. And configurating is obviously not english. :) -- Hans van Kranenburg - System / Network Engineer T +31 (0)10 2760434 | hans.van.kranenburg at mendix.com | www.mendix.com -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name:

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.1.4-2 Severity: normal Hi, During some research I encountered incorrect information in the man page of xm, about the dump-core functionality: The man page says: "Defaults to dumping the core without pausing the domain if no I<OPTIONS> are specified." When taking a look at the source code of this process, the default behaviour is to actually

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64 Version: 4.4.1-8 Severity: normal Tags: patch The Xen hypervisor in Debian Jessie does not boot on recent HP server hardware (e.g. the current dl360 gen9 series) when using normal "legacy" boot. During boot, it panics with the message "System without CMOS RTC must be booted from EFI". This message was introduced in upstream commit

I'm just dumping all I got in here, after initial feedback we can see how to organize todo's around it. tl;dr: * Does not upgrade cleanly from 4.8 packages, so we have to prevent this from entering testing until we fix that. * Live migration is broken, explodes with memory allocation errors. ---- >8 ---- 1. Build packages * I have built salsa/master using pbuilder targeting sid.

Package: xen-utils-3.2-1 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: wishlist Hi, this morning I spend some time to find out how to log console output of Xen guest domains into a file in dom0. I ended up using a quick 'n dirty solution: mario:/usr/lib/xen-3.2-1/bin 0-# diff -u xend.orig xend --- xend.orig 2009-03-02 16:49:49.000000000 +0100 +++ xend 2009-03-02 16:16:03.000000000 +0100 @@ -100,7 +100,8 @@

After turning off hibernation this issue did not occur anymore in Squeeze. Now we've turned on hibernation again, ran the test to reproduce this issue and this issue occurred within 10 minutes on Squeeze with Hibernation on. Then we've upgraded our test environment from Squeeze to Wheezy and ran the test to reproduce this issue again on Wheezy with hibernation turned on. This test

Obviously i meant hyperthreading. Probably need more coffee:) -- Frank Baalbergen - System / Network Administrator T +31 (0)10 2760434 | frank.baalbergen at mendix.com | www.mendix.com

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 08:44:50AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 01:58:19AM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > > Ok great. Since I'm not using (and probably not going to use) the > > multi-stage multiboot things, this is harder for me to help with. > > With any luck I should be able to work that bit out myself, since I > think stable's Xen

Hi Colin, Thanks for the quick reply. On 1/5/19 8:04 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 01:02:47AM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: >> In december, Xen PVH support has been committed in grub master: >> https://www.mail-archive.com/grub-devel at gnu.org/msg28125.html >> >> The last pieces needed in the Linux kernel to boot PVH with grub2 landed >>

To: Debian xen and kernel team list, Ian Jackson Cc: Stefan Bader, maintainer of xen packages in Ubuntu Hi all, Short version: Hi! I'd like to help with the Xen packaging in Debian. Long version: Q: Who are you? How are you related to Debian an the Xen project? A: Hi, I'm Hans van Kranenburg, nickname Knorrie, I live in the Netherlands. I'm a Debian user since 2002, and have been

Hi Debian Grub maintainer, In december, Xen PVH support has been committed in grub master: https://www.mail-archive.com/grub-devel at gnu.org/msg28125.html The last pieces needed in the Linux kernel to boot PVH with grub2 landed in Linux 4.20. I asked our kernel team to carry those patches on top of the Linux 4.19 kernel that is going to ship in Buster, and that wish was granted:

On 1/6/19 11:21 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 10:51:13PM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: >> On 1/5/19 8:04 PM, Colin Watson wrote: >>> I think I'm OK with cherry-picking the relevant patch stack. Presumably >>> this would need to be in new grub-xen-pvh-bin / grub-xen-pvh binary >>> packages, as is usual for separate platform builds?

On 02/12/2019 06:10 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hans van Kranenburg, le lun. 11 févr. 2019 22:59:11 +0100, a ecrit: >> On 2/11/19 2:37 AM, Dongli Zhang wrote: >>> >>> On 2/10/19 12:35 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: >>>> >>>> Hans van Kranenburg, le sam. 09 févr. 2019 17:01:55 +0100, a ecrit: >>>>>> I have forwarded the original

On 2/11/19 2:37 AM, Dongli Zhang wrote: > > On 2/10/19 12:35 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> >> Hans van Kranenburg, le sam. 09 févr. 2019 17:01:55 +0100, a ecrit: >>>> I have forwarded the original mail: all VM I/O get stuck, and thus the >>>> VM becomes unusable. >>> >>> These are in many cases the symptoms of running out of "grant

On 2/12/19 1:35 AM, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10 2019, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: >> >> Please remove the 'xm' file from the bash-completion package. This >> command does not exist in Xen any more (last time it was relevant was in >> Jessie, where it was already deprecated). > > That should be easy to do for Debian. On the other hand, I

Package: bash-completion Version: 1:2.8-5 Hi bash completion maintainer, Please remove the 'xm' file from the bash-completion package. This command does not exist in Xen any more (last time it was relevant was in Jessie, where it was already deprecated). Also, I just hijacked another of your bugs, 768005 , about the xl command completion. Hope that's fine, we can maintain this in