similar to: Tinc 1.1pre3, 1.1pre4 hangs after some time, on win32 platform

Hello, I have set up a multipath gateway. System is a linux 2.4.29 kernel, iproute 20010824, iptables 1.2.11. here is the setup: firewall:/# ip rule 0: from all lookup local 100: from all lookup main 152: from all fwmark 10 lookup wan1 153: from all fwmark 20 lookup wan2 201: from 213.223.96.121 lookup wan1 202: from 82.236.230.217 lookup wan2 1000: from

Hi, I have a linux box which balances load between two interfaces ( say WAN1 and WAN2). I have masquerading on for any request coming from LAN to the outside world. The setup is in such a way that WAN1 drops packets with source ip belonging to WAN2''s network and viceversa. For some strange reason, I find that packet coming out from the WAN interface has source address of WAN2 and

Hello, I''m trying to setup an 8 port wan configuration (pptp+pppoe) with one vlan trunk. My internal networks are : LAN(eth9): 10.0.0.0/16 VLAN10(eth9) 10.10.0.0/24 VLAN20(eth9) 10.20.0.0/24 VLAN30(eth9) 10.30.0.0/24 VLAN100(eth9) 10.100.0.0/24 I would like to post my configuration here since i don''t success to do the following: 1. Communicate between VLANxx to LAN

Background: WAN1 - Fixed IP low latency, low jitter WAN2 - Fixed IP medium latency, higher jitter than I like for good VoIP Firewall/Router not SIP aware NATed LAN Asterisk on server located on LAN. Most, but not all ATA/IP phones on LAN In the past I was running a v1.2 Asterisk which acted as a B2BUA (all RTP streams relayed through Asterisk server) thus presenting only one SIP device to the

I am developing load balancing router, But I have a question about fail over. The follow diagram is my test environment and scripts. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Environment Setting PC1(192.168.10.2) | (LAN) | PC2-eth2(192.168.10.1) +

Ok folks, here goes.. I have been boggling with a problem for the past week, and still haven''t found a solution.. I''m trying to route traffic from two providers through a Linux machine. But that is not the problem. The ISP''s have provided me with a WAN IP class for both of the lines, to be routed into a DMZ where the machines a to respond to their respective

-----Original Message----- From: Salim S I [mailto:salim.si@cipherium.com.tw] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:22 PM To: ''Francis Brosnan Blazquez'' Subject: RE: [LARTC] Load balancing using connmark "I think the main advantage of shorewall solution is that it applies connmark to incoming packets from the wan as you point, leaving load balancing to outgoing connections to the

> Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:10:35 +1300 > From: Paul <lists@loudas.com> > Subject: [Shorewall-users] another network to add > To: Shorewall List <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> > Message-ID: <41AF84CB.5080304@loudas.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hi Tom (and others) > encase you

Hello, I am thinking of connecting a Shorewall Firewall to three different ISPs and load balancing some but not all connections. Just asking for some advice for now. Here''s the network layout: ISP1 ISP2 ISP3 ADSL Router 1 ADSL Router 2 ADSL Router 3 | | | FW:eth0 FW:eth1 FW:eth2

Hi, You can define your default gateway in "/etc/sysconfig/network" file, GATEWAY="192.168.1.1" After that, restart network services. # systemctl restart network --Regards Ashishkumar S. Yadav On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Levente Birta <blevi.linux at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > There is a Centos 7 up-to-date box with 2 interfaces, let's say >

Hi, this is my first post to the list. I have googled a lot, and still cannot find a proper solution. I hope someone here will be able to shed some light on my doubts. I have set up a firewall using kernel 2.6.15 (Debian) that does NAT for 100 clients, and uses two different ISPs, using the howto found at http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html. I have *not*

Hello all, my apologies if I have failed to RTFM, but the PDF manual and google were no help. I am trying to get a simple two node tunnel setup. I have verified that the up scripts bring up the interfaces as they are written; however my gut feeling is that there is something wrong there, but I am not sure exactly what. Misc items: * I have a Port line in horcrux because I ran INIT as a user,

Hi Tom (and others) encase you don''t know my network already ;) here''s a quick run down eth0 lan 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0 eth1 wan1 172.30.7.4/255.255.240.0 eth2 wan2 202.37.230.93/255.255.255.192 eth3 wan3 203.96.213.73/255.255.254.0 I''ve got routes and rules for all the above interfaces :) I want to add another one, however I fear this might cause some issues I have

Hi There is a Centos 7 up-to-date box with 2 interfaces, let's say 192.168.1.12 - enp2s0, 192.168.1.13 on enp3s0. Default gateway on enp2s0. The gateway is pfsense, IP is 192.168.1.1 with 2 WAN connections On the gateway the outgoing traffic is routed by source ip to different WAN, 192.168.1.12 to WAN1 and 192.168.1.13 to WAN2 On the centos box are set all the route and routing rules:

With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.1pre3. Here is a summary of the changes: * Added the "AutoConnect" option which will let tinc automatically select which nodes to connect to. * Improved performance of VLAN-tagged IP traffic inside the VPN. * Ensured LocalDiscovery works with multiple BindToAddress statements and/or IPv6-only LANs. * Dropped dependency on

With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.1pre3. Here is a summary of the changes: * Added the "AutoConnect" option which will let tinc automatically select which nodes to connect to. * Improved performance of VLAN-tagged IP traffic inside the VPN. * Ensured LocalDiscovery works with multiple BindToAddress statements and/or IPv6-only LANs. * Dropped dependency on

tnet.itand SIP register messages are not replied. I suggested to check if your Asterisk box is really sending SIP messages, you can use a net sniffer. Did you alerady used different sip client with the same sip account of your Asterisk box? Did you use zoiper from the same box? Marino p.s. Are you Italian? On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Giorgio Incantalupo < gincantalupo at

I have tried using iptraf for my NAT firewall to analyse the IP traffic. Basically I am faced with this difficulty of related the source IP to the outgoing interface to the internet, so I am wondering if anyone has a suggestion for a different ways to do it, or a suggestion for a better tool. Details :- Supposed : eth0 - LAN eth1 - WAN1 eth2 - WAN2 And then

Hello, I have a new problem with WINE, after the newest update of wine (1.3.26) steam and osu! are not working anymore. I've alerady tried reinstalling wine and removing wineprefix and none of these worked. The biggest problem is that wine doesn't give me any information about errors, it just goes to the debugger ot once. steam: http://www.copypastecode.com/76835/ osu!:

I compiled tinc 1.1pre10 for all my linux machines, just dropped in the new binaries, and restarted tinc. With 1.1pre10, all my linux machines are running and communicating just fine with each other. I have one Windows machine on which I run tinc. It sits behind a firewall (nat) and no longer will connect with the rest of my network. What I did was, remove the tinc service, uninstalled tinc