similar to: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next v5] bridge: export multicast database via netlink

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "[Bridge] [PATCH net-next v5] bridge: export multicast database via netlink"

2012 Dec 05
2
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next v3] bridge: export multicast database via netlink
V3: drop debugging printk's update selinux perm table as well V2: drop patch 1/2, export ifindex directly Redesign netlink attributes Improve netlink seq check Handle IPv6 addr as well This patch exports bridge multicast database via netlink message type RTM_GETMDB. Similar to fdb, but currently bridge-specific. We may need to support modify multicast database too
2012 Dec 07
3
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next v4] bridge: export multicast database via netlink
From: Cong Wang <amwang at redhat.com> V4: remove some useless #include some coding style fix V3: drop debugging printk's update selinux perm table as well V2: drop patch 1/2, export ifindex directly Redesign netlink attributes Improve netlink seq check Handle IPv6 addr as well This patch exports bridge multicast database via netlink message type RTM_GETMDB.
2012 Nov 27
3
[Bridge] [RFC PATCH 1/2] bridge: export port_no and port_id via IFA_INFO_DATA
Based on net-next. This patch exports port->port_no port->port_id in the end of IFA_INFO_DATA. Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger at vyatta.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem at davemloft.net> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf at suug.ch> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang
2013 Aug 26
0
[PATCH] bridge: separate querier and query timer into IGMP/IPv4 and MLD/IPv6 ones
Currently we would still potentially suffer multicast packet loss if there is just either an IGMP or an MLD querier: For the former case, we would possibly drop IPv6 multicast packets, for the latter IPv4 ones. This is because we are currently assuming that if either an IGMP or MLD querier is present that the other one is present, too. This patch makes the behaviour and fix added in "bridge:
2013 Mar 08
3
[Bridge] [Patch net] bridge: do not expire mdb entry when bridge still uses it
From: Cong Wang <amwang at redhat.com> This is a long-standing bug and reported several times: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880035 http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136164389416341&w=2 This bug can be observed in virt environment, when a KVM guest communicates with the host via multicast. After some time (should be 260 sec, I didn't measure), the multicast
2012 Dec 10
0
[Bridge] [PATCH v5] iproute2: add mdb sub-command to bridge
From: Cong Wang <amwang at redhat.com> V5: make the output pretty V4: fix filter_dev remove some useless #include V3: improve the output, display router info only for -d fix router parsing code V2: sync with the kernel patch handle IPv6 addr a few cleanup Sample output: # ./bridge/bridge mdb show dev br0 bridge br0 port eth1 group 224.8.8.9 bridge br0 port eth0 group
2013 Nov 16
0
[Bridge] [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/14] bridge/br_mdb: Apply ACCESS_ONCE() to avoid sparse false positive
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com> The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded to reject non-__kernel address spaces. This also rejects __rcu, which is almost always the right thing to do. However, the use in __br_mdb_del() is legitimate: They are assigning a pointer to an element from an RCU-protected list, and all elements of this
2005 Mar 20
3
Adding dsmark qdisc fails
I''m trying to configure dsmark qdisc on 2.6.11.4 user mode linux and tc from iproute2-2.6.11-050314. I think I have some mismatch in my setup since adding dsmark qdisc fails *unless* I specify "set_tc_index" argument which I believe should be optional: # tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 8 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument Mar 20 13:00:50 user user.debug
2012 Jul 27
1
[Bridge] [PATCH 4/7] bridge: call NETDEV_RELEASE notifier in br_del_if()
When a bridge interface deletes its underlying ports, it should notify netconsole too, like what bonding interface does. Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem at davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang at redhat.com> --- net/bridge/br_if.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c index e1144e1..d243914
2012 Dec 14
1
[Bridge] [PATCH] bridge: Bug fix for incorrect interpretation of MLDv2 maximum response code
This patch fixes the incorrect interpretation of endianness of MLDv2 maximum response code within bridge's multicast snooping code. Signed-off-by: Ang Way Chuang <wcang at sfc.wide.ad.jp> --- diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c index 977c3ee..29c6283 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c @@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ static int
2014 Oct 20
4
[PATCH v4 13/25] virtio_console: enable VQs early
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:42:23PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:07:50 +0100 > Thomas Graf <tgraf at suug.ch> wrote: > > > On 10/13/14 at 10:50am, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > virtio spec requires drivers to set DRIVER_OK before using VQs. > > > This is set automatically after probe returns, virtio console violated this > >
2014 Oct 20
4
[PATCH v4 13/25] virtio_console: enable VQs early
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:42:23PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:07:50 +0100 > Thomas Graf <tgraf at suug.ch> wrote: > > > On 10/13/14 at 10:50am, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > virtio spec requires drivers to set DRIVER_OK before using VQs. > > > This is set automatically after probe returns, virtio console violated this > >
2017 Jun 20
0
Re: guest A from virbr0 can talk to guest B in virbr1 but not vice versa
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:26:59AM -0400, Travis S. Johnson wrote: >Hello, > >I came across an interesting problem in my home lab a few weeks ago as I'm >prepping for my RHCE exam using Michael Jang study guide. I've been at this >for days now, and I still can't wrap my head around how two or more virtual >networks in default NAT configuration are even allowed to
2017 Jun 20
2
guest A from virbr0 can talk to guest B in virbr1 but not vice versa
Hello, I came across an interesting problem in my home lab a few weeks ago as I'm prepping for my RHCE exam using Michael Jang study guide. I've been at this for days now, and I still can't wrap my head around how two or more virtual networks in default NAT configuration are even allowed to communicate with each other despite what the libvirt documentation said. Here's the
2023 Jan 26
1
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next 05/16] net: bridge: Change a cleanup in br_multicast_new_port_group() to goto
This function is getting more to clean up in the following patches. Structuring the cleanups in one labeled block will allow reusing the same cleanup from several places. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm at nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch at nvidia.com> --- net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git
2013 Sep 04
6
[Bridge] bride: IPv6 multicast snooping enhancements
Hi, Here are two, small feature changes I would like to submit to increase the usefulness of the multicast snooping of the bridge code. The first patch is an unaltered one I had submitted before, but since it got no feedback I'm resubmitting it here for net-next. With the recently added patch to disable snooping if there is no querier (b00589af + 248ba8ec05 + 8d50af4fb), it should be a safe
2007 Mar 19
9
[BUG?] ip ru flush && RTNETLINK answers: Numerical result out of range
After an: # ip ru flush I loose all my ip rules but the priority 0 one. root@sarasvati:~# ip ru 0: from all lookup 255 root@sarasvati:~# Ok with that, but now i''m not able to insert any new rule. This leads to a total loose of conectivity. root@sarasvati:~# ip ru add from all table default RTNETLINK answers: Numerical result out of range root@sarasvati:~# ip ru add from all
2014 Oct 20
1
[PATCH] virtio_console: move early VQ enablement
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:58:49PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> Commit f5866db6 (virtio_console: enable VQs early) tried to make >> sure that DRIVER_OK was set when virtio_console started using its >> virtqueues. Doing this in add_port(), however, means that we try >> to set
2014 Oct 20
1
[PATCH] virtio_console: move early VQ enablement
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:58:49PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> Commit f5866db6 (virtio_console: enable VQs early) tried to make >> sure that DRIVER_OK was set when virtio_console started using its >> virtqueues. Doing this in add_port(), however, means that we try >> to set
2014 Oct 20
1
[PATCH] virtio_console: move early VQ enablement
Commit f5866db6 (virtio_console: enable VQs early) tried to make sure that DRIVER_OK was set when virtio_console started using its virtqueues. Doing this in add_port(), however, means that we try to set DRIVER_OK again when when a port is dynamically added after the probe function is done. Let's move virtio_device_ready() to the probe function just before trying to use the virtqueues instead.