similar to: tinc1.1pre4 tincctl restart

First off, thanks to all who have made tinc possible and continue to work developing it. I hope perhaps in time I can become a useful part of this community. :) I'm having an interesting issue with tincctl and was hoping someone could shed some light on it. Everything seems to work correctly when I build for OSX; however on linux and windows builds, I always receive connection

This approach is more complex than I'd like, but it works even on Solaris, which has neither credential passing nor permissions on the socket itself. --- src/control.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- src/control_common.h | 1 + src/tincctl.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- src/tincd.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 120

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 02:36:18PM +0800, Amit Lianson wrote: > We're suffering from sporadic network blockage(read: unable to ping > other nodes) with 1.1-pre17. Before upgrading to the 1.1-pre release, > the same network blockage also manifested itself in a pure 1.0.33 > network. > > The log shows that there are a lot of "Got ADD_EDGE from nodeX >

I'm currently running tinc-pre6 on 2 nodes in a larger network. My Laptop (Lassulus), lan ip: 192.168.2.100, tinc-ip: 10.243.0.2 My Server (alphalabs), lan ip: 192.168.2.103, tinc-ip: 10.243.1.10 internet vserver (slowpoke), no lan ip, tinc-ip: 10.243.232.121 Everything works fine until both nodes are in the same LAN. The first 2-3 minutes everything is fine. Pings between the machines go

There are at least three cases: * Linux: check credentials and pid from client; restrict permissions from server * BSD: check credentials only from client; restrict permissions from server * Solaris: wide open --- configure.in | 4 ++-- src/control.c | 11 ++++++++++- src/control_common.h | 1 + src/tincctl.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 4

(Second try to send this. I wonder if the first one gotten eaten by a spam filter; I'll link to patches instead of attaching them.) Here are the tincctl patches I've been working on. They apply to http://www.tinc-vpn.org/svn/tinc/branches/1.1@1545. I intend to commit them once the crypto stuff's fixed. Since they're basically done, I'm emailing them now for review and in case

> > Maybe I should allow the reachable keyword for the dump graph command as > well, so you can do: > > tincctl -n <netname> dump reachable graph > > ...and not see any nodes which are unreachable. Is that what you want? This would help since dead nodes do not clutter the visual representation. What are the effects, if any, of dead nodes in the hosts/ dir? Thanks

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Guus: Thanks for the reply. Did you like the PDF examples? Do you want to help me build more examples for the web site so people can download the PDF network diagrams and have sample config files to match them? What changes should I make to allow for easier setup/config/config files of the 2 use cases? For the production example, would it be

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 08:25:28AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote: > But I have a question regarding "Subnet=" possibilities. When I have more than > one Server acting as host for VMs and need to have automatic routing to > all VMs on these servers, can I use tinc to create this routing automatically? > > My idea is to have a script which is started when a VM is

On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:57:25AM +0000, cuBe wrote: > Having some probs with setting up tap0: > > aibo:~# ifconfig tap0 hw ether fe:fd:00:00:00:00 > SIOCSIFHWADDR: No such device > > Now, I;ve checked everthing, and it all seems in order. I have compiled in > theUniversal TAP/TUN support, and Netlink (including CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV), > but to no avil, that error always

systemctl enable tincd at NETNAME systemctl: command not found Please help? Regards Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at hotmail.com> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Maxim Vorontsov <6012030 at gmail.com> wrote: > systemctl enable tincd at NETNAME for example > > -- > brgds > Max > On Feb 8, 2016 12:15 AM, Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at gmail.com> wrote: >

Hi, I need to re-open the thread blow. The situation is still the same. The HUP signal does not trigger reloading of subnet declarations in own hosts file (Version 1.0.35). After a quick view to the source code, file src/net.c shows in line 658 would reload subnets when using StrictSubnets only. But why? With StrictSubnets it doesn't make sense to me. I did a quick check and removed the if

http://bfy.tw/48zr -- brgds Max On Feb 8, 2016 7:39 AM, Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at gmail.com> wrote: Im running ubuntu 14.04. Regards Yazeed Fataar On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at gmail.com> wrote: systemctl enable tincd at NETNAME systemctl: command not found Please help? Regards Yazeed Fataar On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Maxim

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:51:30PM +0300, R?zvan Sandu wrote: > Taking into account that both Red Hat and Debian (8.x) families now use > systemd, there is, IMHO, one small. but important correction to be done: > tinc's initialization. > > IMHO, we need: > > 1. A proper tinc.service file, included by default (prepackaged) in the > stock .deb and .rpm packages in

Hi all, I am trying to setup a configuration of Tinc to allow multiple tincd daemons for a same network (mixing bonding, etc...). I will post my solution later if I found one. This is to get better speeds in multiple gigabit/sec networks. So my question is not about this directly. I would like to know if the "netname" configured on each node, is used somewhere in communications

I've been running tincd on several machines without a problem. I'm now setting up a new intel-type dual-processor machine, with a custom compiled 2.4.9 linux kernel. When I start the daemon: tincd -n vpn -dddddddddd I get the following debug information in in /var/log/messages Aug 27 17:26:49 q tinc.vpn[971]: Process 972 (tinc-up) exited with non-zero status 255 Aug 27 17:26:49 q

Hey List, Hey Guus, I would now like to secure my tinc installation. From the man page I see the following. -L I put EXTRA="-L" in /etc/default/tinc and tinc still works. -R Do I have to put libraries and device files under /etc/tinc/NETNAME to build a functional chroot jail ? Currently lsof reports these open resources for tincd: lsof -p $( pgrep tincd ) -n COMMAND PID USER FD

Am 17.02.2017 um 10:59 schrieb Guus Sliepen: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:55:26AM +0100, Sandro Stiller wrote: > >> On my system, tinc is started on bootup. >> If the Network cable is not connected, tincd hangs forever after these messages: > [...] >> 2017-02-13 11:34:02 tinc.XXX[403]: Error looking up XXX.net port 2300: Temporary failure in name resolution > [...]

I found a tincd crash caused by having two "Port" statements in a host's file. I realize this is a bug in an old version of tinc that may be fixed but I spent the past few hours tracking it down so I'm sharing it in hopes others can make use of this info. I was "cleaning" up my Tinc VPN of a collection of OpenWrt routers and tincd started crashing with "Got fatal

LOL .... thanks Maxim. I understand how to do it in Ubuntu , just not sure the correct syntax to put. Regards Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at hotmail.com> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Maxim Vorontsov <6012030 at gmail.com> wrote: > http://bfy.tw/48zr > > -- > brgds > Max > On Feb 8, 2016 7:39 AM, Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at gmail.com> wrote: > >