similar to: [Bug 9466] New: GPFS ACLs are not copied by rsync when copying between two GPFS filesystems

Hi I am accessing files in a ZFS file system via NFSv4. I am not logged in a root. File permissions look as expected when I inspect them with ls -v and ls -V I only have owner and group ACLs...nothing for everyone. bash-3.00$ id uid=100(timt) gid=10001(ccbcadmins) bash-3.00$ groups ccbcadmins staff bash-3.00$ ls -v testacl -rwxrwx---+ 1 timt ccbcadmins 0 Jan 31 16:24 testacl

I think the issue may be related to the broken trusts. First of all only two people had specifically reported issues which meant for most people it was acceptable. Then I noticed that some directories seemed slower than others. If I ssh'd into the server and checked permissions, listing permissions on most directories was quick (under 2 second.) On directories that allowed

Does anybody have experience of running Samba on a domain and getting inherited file permissions on a Samba server to more closely match the permissions you would see on a Windows 2000 box? I'm trying to reproduce our departmental folders on a Samba box, running on ZFS with NFSv4 ACL's, but I'm struggling to get inherited permissions working properly when new files are created.

In our situation, we have users home directories on a zfs filesystem which are available from both nfs and via samba. One of our requirements is that we have to prevent users on the nfs mounted systems from being able to perform a chmod on their own home directory that allows other users access to their home directories. To this end we use ZFS ACLs such that we chown the user's home directory

I'm trying to use zfs acls in solaris 10. I've looked at past posts regarding this and some online help, but am stuck. I'm currently using samba 3.3.9; I've had the same problem with 3.3.7. samba is compiled and running as an Active Directory member server (compiled with ldap and kerberos). The zfs disk is local. I'm not using winbind. I compiled with zfsacl module.

Hello, New here, and I''m not sure if this is the correct mailing list to post this question or not. Anyway, we are having some questions about multi-protocol (CIFS/NFS) access to the same files specifically when not using AD or LDAP. Summary: Accessing the same folder from CIFS or NFS when working in a workgroup configuration (no domain authentication) works fine using cifs user

HI all, Having fixed the group issues from solaris having a default max of 16 groups I can now locally create and delete files on the solaris box as a domain user However when accessed via samba I can not create new files/folders (although I can delete the files I created when logged on locally) I have created a temporary directory on a non zfs (non acl enabled) file system to see if that

Right now, FreeBSD supports one type of ACLs - so called POSIX.1e ACLs. They are natural extension of the traditional Unix permissions, and for a long time were the only nonproprietary ACL type in Unix systems. Times change, and now there are several problems with them: they never actually become standard (the draft they are based on was withdrawn); this results in minor incompatibilities

Hi, I am using samba samba3-3.3.4-39, with ctdb ctdb-1.0-69.x86_64, gpfs gpfs-3.2.1 on centos 5.3 x86_64. My problem is that from samba share I can't read file permissions and file ownership, although I'm in "domain admins" group, which has full permissions(rwx) via inherited acl (not user or group ownership). If I'm in a group that owns the file, I can read the permissions,

ZFS introduces a new and incompatible ACL interface into Solaris and this seems to be not yet fully completed in addition to the fact that is causes a lot of problems for software that needs to be compatible with Solaris-2.5 like star. Proof for incompatibility: create a file on UFS and set an ACL for this file. Use Sun tar cpf out file to archive this file. Unpack this archive file on ZFS

There are definitely some files with some weird names- in an ssh session they don't even have regular characters. e.g -rw-rw---- 1 xxx xxx 114985112 Oct 31 14:39 ▒^t Not sure if that is related to problems though. The top command shows Memory: 12G phys mem, 343M free mem, 2048M total swap, 2048M free swap This is in the evening so should not be much load but I think

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1657 Summary: tests/functional/acl/nontrivial/zfs_acl_cp_001_pos causes panic Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2

Hi everyone, I''ve been experimenting with ZFS for some time and I have one question: Is it possible to hide file with ZFS ACL ? Let me explain what I would like to do: A directory (chmod 0755) contains 3 subdirs: public, private an veryprivate public has read access to everyone (0755) private has no access at all for everyone (0750), but anyone can still see it in ls veryprivate has no

Hello. A Mac client of mine has a problem deleting an empty folder from the root of a Samba 4.12 server share, reporting a permission issue; however, the more I look at it, the more I am convinced it should be able to delete it. smb.conf: > [global] > workgroup=XXXXXXXX > realm=XXXXXXXX.local > interfaces=em0 > hosts allow=192.168.XXX. 10.0.XXX.2

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7382 Summary: Fails to copy with ACL issue if src user is unknown (OSX 10.6 only) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.12 release series. Major enhancements include: o BUG 14537: ctdb-common: Avoid aliasing errors during code optimization. o BUG 14486: vfs_glusterfs: Avoid data corruption with the write-behind translator. ======= Details ======= The GlusterFS write-behind performance translator,

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.12 release series. Major enhancements include: o BUG 14537: ctdb-common: Avoid aliasing errors during code optimization. o BUG 14486: vfs_glusterfs: Avoid data corruption with the write-behind translator. ======= Details ======= The GlusterFS write-behind performance translator,

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Major enhancements include: o BUG 14537: ctdb-common: Avoid aliasing errors during code optimization. o BUG 14486: vfs_glusterfs: Avoid data corruption with the write-behind translator. ======= Details ======= The GlusterFS write-behind performance translator,

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Major enhancements include: o BUG 14537: ctdb-common: Avoid aliasing errors during code optimization. o BUG 14486: vfs_glusterfs: Avoid data corruption with the write-behind translator. ======= Details ======= The GlusterFS write-behind performance translator,

After a crash, in my zpool tree, some dataset report this we i do a ls -la: brwxrwxrwx 2 777 root 0, 0 Oct 18 2009 mail-cts also if i set zfs set mountpoint=legacy dataset and then i mount the dataset to other location before the directory tree was only : dataset - vdisk.raw The file was a backing device of a Xen VM, but i cannot access the directory structure of this dataset. However i