similar to: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Multiqueue support for virtio-net

Hi all: This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments. A protype implementation of qemu-kvm support could by found in git://github.com/jasowang/qemu-kvm-mq.git. To start a guest with two queues, you could specify the queues

Hi all: This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments. A protype implementation of qemu-kvm support could by found in git://github.com/jasowang/qemu-kvm-mq.git. To start a guest with two queues, you could specify the queues

Hi all: This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments. A protype implementation of qemu-kvm support could by found in git://github.com/jasowang/qemu-kvm-mq.git. To start a guest with two queues, you could specify the queues

Hi all: This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments. A protype implementation of qemu-kvm support could by found in git://github.com/jasowang/qemu-kvm-mq.git. To start a guest with two queues, you could specify the queues

Hi all: This series is an update version (hope the final version) of multiqueue (VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ) support in virtio-net driver. All previous comments were addressed, the work were based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Performance test show the aggregate latency were increased greately but may get some regression

Hi all: This series is an update version (hope the final version) of multiqueue (VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ) support in virtio-net driver. All previous comments were addressed, the work were based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Performance test show the aggregate latency were increased greately but may get some regression

Hi all: This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments. Changes from v5: - Align the implementation with the RFC spec update v4 - Switch the mode between single mode and multiqueue mode without reset - Remove the 256 limitation

Hi all: This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments. Changes from v5: - Align the implementation with the RFC spec update v4 - Switch the mode between single mode and multiqueue mode without reset - Remove the 256 limitation

Hello All: This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments. Test Environment: - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 8 cores 2 numa nodes - Two directed connected 82599 Test Summary: - Highlights: huge improvements on TCP_RR

Hello All: This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments. Test Environment: - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 8 cores 2 numa nodes - Two directed connected 82599 Test Summary: - Highlights: huge improvements on TCP_RR

Hello All: This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments. Test Environment: - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 8 cores 2 numa nodes - Two directed connected 82599 Test Summary: - Highlights: huge improvements on TCP_RR

Hello All: This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments. Test Environment: - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 8 cores 2 numa nodes - Two directed connected 82599 Test Summary: - Highlights: huge improvements on TCP_RR

As multi-queue nics were commonly used for high-end servers, current single queue based tap can not satisfy the requirement of scaling guest network performance as the numbers of vcpus increase. So the following series implements multiple queue support in tun/tap. In order to take advantages of this, a multi-queue capable driver and qemu were also needed. I just rebase the latest version of

As multi-queue nics were commonly used for high-end servers, current single queue based tap can not satisfy the requirement of scaling guest network performance as the numbers of vcpus increase. So the following series implements multiple queue support in tun/tap. In order to take advantages of this, a multi-queue capable driver and qemu were also needed. I just rebase the latest version of

This patch series resurrects the earlier multiple TX/RX queues functionality for virtio_net, and addresses the issues pointed out. It also includes an API to share irq's, f.e. amongst the TX vqs. I plan to run TCP/UDP STREAM and RR tests for local->host and local->remote, and send the results in the next couple of days. patch #1: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_MULTIQUEUE patch #2: Move

This patch series resurrects the earlier multiple TX/RX queues functionality for virtio_net, and addresses the issues pointed out. It also includes an API to share irq's, f.e. amongst the TX vqs. I plan to run TCP/UDP STREAM and RR tests for local->host and local->remote, and send the results in the next couple of days. patch #1: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_MULTIQUEUE patch #2: Move

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb at google.com> Add napi for virtio-net transmit completion processing. Based on previous patchsets by Jason Wang: [RFC V7 PATCH 0/7] enable tx interrupts for virtio-net http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1505.3/00245.html Changes: RFC -> v1: - dropped vhost interrupt moderation patch: not needed and likely expensive at light

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb at google.com> Add napi for virtio-net transmit completion processing. Based on previous patchsets by Jason Wang: [RFC V7 PATCH 0/7] enable tx interrupts for virtio-net http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1505.3/00245.html Changes: RFC -> v1: - dropped vhost interrupt moderation patch: not needed and likely expensive at light

The following series applies to net-next. The following series changes the low memory paths in virtio_net to allow the driver to contribute to reclaim when memory is tight. It attempts to rectify some performance problems we've seen where the network performance drops significantly when memory is low. The working theory is that while the driver contributes to memory pressure when throughput

The following series applies to net-next. The following series changes the low memory paths in virtio_net to allow the driver to contribute to reclaim when memory is tight. It attempts to rectify some performance problems we've seen where the network performance drops significantly when memory is low. The working theory is that while the driver contributes to memory pressure when throughput