Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Error: unlink_directory(.../lucene-indexes) with doveadm index"
2011 Aug 24
1
unlink_directory failed with 'Device or resource busy' on NFS
Hi,
I'm getting some errors while I'm trying to move mailboxes from IMAP server to Outlook client. The error message is "IMAP command is failed" and I think it is useless.
Here are the error messages written to server's syslog.
imap(name at domain.com<mailto:name at domain.com>): Error: unlink_directory(/data/domain.com/name/INBOX/direct/.nfs00000000000033fd000000cd)
2008 Jun 20
1
ForceCommand internal-sftp causes sftp logging to fail (openssh-5.0p1)
Hi guys,
I have a server setup with openssh-5.0p1 and use some users as
sftp-only chroot accounts.
The following configuration yields exactly the result I want:
user is chrooted, logs to syslog, all is good.
#================================================#
Subsystem sftp internal-sftp -f AUTHPRIV -l VERBOSE
Match User fredwww
ChrootDirectory %h
#ForceCommand internal-sftp
2007 Nov 17
2
unlink_directory(....Trash.NewFolder) failed: Directory not empty
I noticed the following this week. No idea how long its been happening because I have
not tested deleting folders hardly at all. Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a folder "NewFolder", click on it in thunderbird so an index dir is created:
ls -ldi Maildir/.NewFolder/
1504062 drwx------ 5 mcdouga9 egrstaff 4096 Nov 16 19:44 Maildir/.NewFolder/
ls -ldi
2012 Oct 16
2
Difference between Indexing and Rescan in FTS
I've had squat running on dovecot 2.0 and have been updating all users
mailbox indexes nighty via cron with this command:
doveadm -v search -A text xyzzyx
I've just updated to 2.1 and I'm migrating to lucene indexes, but reading
the documentation I'm having a hard time understanding the semantic
differences between indexing and rescanning.
If I were to continue to run an
2008 Sep 14
2
Dovecot cannot unlink non-empty directory
Hi,
Currently I use dovecot 1.1.3 on Debian Testing. CPU arch is x86. Mail
is stored on ext3 fs.
I'm having a following problem with deleting folders (there is no
problem with creation of folders):
Error: IMAP(test at laptop.aonet.pl):
unlink_directory(/home/vpopmail/domains/laptop.aonet.pl/test/.//Maildir/..DOVECOT-TRASHED)
failed: Permission denied
HOW TO REPRODUCE
1. Create a fresh new
2010 Jan 15
3
unlinking
Quick question. How important are these? Are the errors recoverable and
not a big deal, or are they actually a problem? I see a few of these
randomly over the course of the day.
Jan 15 10:04:04 gehenna13.rutgers.edu dovecot: IMAP(user):
unlink(/rci/nqu/rci/u8/user/dovecot/.such and such
maildir/.nfs00000000001e951000002b8d) failed: Device or resource busy
Jan 15 10:04:04 gehenna13.rutgers.edu
2009 Sep 10
2
Problem Deleting IMAP Folders
Hello,
In my configuration I have
mail_location = maildir:/Mail/frank.gr/%n:INDEX=/Mail/frank.gr/
__Indexes/%u
I can create new folders in an IMAP session, but when I try to delete
I get permission denied.
From the LOG
Sep 10 13:20:06 IMAP(stuart): Error: unlink_directory(/Mail/frank.gr/
__Indexes/stuart/.TEST) failed: Permission denied
ls -ald /Mail/frank.gr/__Indexes/stuart/.TEST
2014 May 27
0
doveadm fts: mbox/lucene-indexes, and other errors
I turned on fts_autoindex today, and wanted to rescan all my mailboxes....
Ran doveadm -Dv fts rescan, and garnered:
thebighonker.lerctr.org /home/ler/mail $ doveadm -Dv fts rescan
doveadm(ler): Debug: Loading modules from directory:
/usr/local/lib/dovecot
doveadm(ler): Debug: Module loaded:
/usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib20_fts_plugin.so
doveadm(ler): Debug: Module loaded:
2012 Sep 18
2
v2.1.10 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.10.tar.gz.sig
The director bugfix is pretty important at least when running in two
director setups, since it can break the directors until both of them are
manually shut down. I'm not entirely sure if the same happens in >2
director setups, but I'd think so (although I do wonder why I
2012 Sep 18
2
v2.1.10 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.10.tar.gz.sig
The director bugfix is pretty important at least when running in two
director setups, since it can break the directors until both of them are
manually shut down. I'm not entirely sure if the same happens in >2
director setups, but I'd think so (although I do wonder why I
2008 Mar 15
1
Maildir delete folder error
I'm getting errors when I try to delete a maildir folder.
Dovecot versions 1.0.10, 1.0.13, 1.1.rc1, 1.1,rc3
Error received:
"dovecot: Mar 15 15:20:29 Error: IMAP(test at mydomain.com):
unlink_directory(/home/mail/mydomain.com/test/..DOVECOT-TRASHED) failed:
Permission denied"
dovecot -n:
"# 1.1.rc3: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/
log_path:
2014 Apr 15
1
Segmentation fault running doveadm index (lucene) on a big mailbox
Hi,
on a server running dovecot 2.2.12 I have a user with a quite big
mailbox (~37000 Mails in the INBOX).
I tried to enable full text search using the fts_lucene backend (dovecot
2.2.12).
However, the `doveadm -v index -u <username> INBOX` always runs into a
segmentation fault after mail number 24200:
I tried to get a backtrace using gdb:
doveadm(<username>): Info: INBOX:
2006 May 30
1
Cannot remove Maildir folder
Hi,
I have been using dovecot 1.0 beta 8 on Debian Sarge for a couple of
days and I experienced some problems when removing folders..
As an IMAP client I use Thunderbird 1.5 and IMAP folders are on NFS.
Here are the steps to re-produce the problem:
1. Run Thunderbird as usual
2. Create folder
3. Remove folder - In my case folder is not removed but moved to Trash
(Thunderbird setting)
4. I go to
2010 Apr 09
1
windows live mail + dovecot and nfs
Hi all. My clients have got problem accessing dovecot by "Windows live
mail (Windows 7)" client. The problem is that users can't delete two or
more folders one-by-one.
There is no errors deleting first folder (new dir
/storage/vol1/mail/domain/user/Maildir/..DOVECOT-TRASHED appeared and
wasn't deleted). If I try to delete second one, error occurs (user,
domain, IP address
2014 Jul 01
1
indexer failure: lucene: while doing doveadm commands
I have the following script:
#!/bin/sh
PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
#Expects to be run after midnight on the first of the month
# to archive all the previous months mail
#Date Run:
TODAY=`date "+%Y-%m-%d"`
#last month in YYYY/MM
YEAR_LAST_MONTH=`date -v-1d "+%Y/%m"`
#1st of last month as 01-Mon-YYYY
FIRST_LAST_MONTH=`date -v-1d "+01-%b-%Y"`
echo 'TODAY='
2011 Feb 14
1
Idea: Backend for Lucene format indexes
Hi,
I'm interested to implement the idea of using search indexes build by
Lucene. I have some idea of how to do that. I'm currently studying the index
format of both. I have written an application of search using Lucene and now
I'll do the same using Xapian. then I'll check the details of those index
format and then find how to convert Lucene index to Xapian one. Is there
somebody
2012 Mar 03
1
GSoC 2012: Backend for Lucene format indexes
Hi All,
I'm Billy, a senior undergraduate student in Peking University. I'm working
in the area of Information Retrieval and Web Mining. When going through the
idea list, I felt quite interested in the "Backend for Lucene format
indexes" project. I have been using java-lucene for about one year, but my
subsequent work prefers C++ codes. This project is very meaningful to
smooth
2013 Sep 02
2
Backend for Lucene format indexes-How to get doclength
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:21:48AM +0800, jiangwen jiang wrote:
> TfIdfWeight and BM25(b=0) also need wdf_upper_bound, it is not exists in
> Lucene backends.
If you don't provide an implementation of wdf_upper_bound(), the default
is to use the collection frequency of the term, so provided that
information is available in the lucene files, the lack of
wdf_upper_bound information
2013 Aug 26
2
Backend for Lucene format indexes-How to get doclength
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 09:41:07AM +0800, jiangwen jiang wrote:
> > For now, using weighting schemes which don't use document length is
> > probably the simplest answer.
>
> There's tf-idf weighting scheme on svn master, is it suitable for lucene
> backend?
Yes - TfIdfWeight doesn't ever use the document length (at least with
the normalisations currently
2014 Aug 01
1
Mail Archiving/Lucene Indexes/mbox
I have a script (available on demand) that moves all my mail for a given
month to a separate NAMESPACE (#ARCHIVE).
When I do that, the lucene-indexes folder in the PRIMARY namespace seems to
get cleaned out, and NOTHING gets put in the lucene-indexes folder
(although it gets created) in the #ARCHIVE namespace.
Is this to spec?
the archiving is done via doveadm move commands.
Thanks!
--