similar to: opusdec playback needs the special file /dev/dsp

opusdec -V opusdec opus-tools f2a2e88 (using libopus unknown) I've got an opus file encoded from a .wav off a cd, 44100Hz: opusinfo 2-24-Overture_in_C_\(In_Memoriam\).opus Processing file "2-24-Overture_in_C_(In_Memoriam).opus"... New logical stream (#1, serial: 38134f1f): type opus Encoded with libopus unknown User comments section follows... ENCODER=opusenc from opus-tools

Hi, I've been using the command line opusenc/opusdec tools for a while now to encode/decode files. The next version of OS X changes a few things, so I was looking to recompile these tools using a version of the OS X SDK > 10.7 (needed for apple's "hardened runtime") but had no luck. How can I compile a static version of opus tools on OS X that doesn't depend on any other

Hello everyone, I'm streaming audio on CentOS 5.8 with no problem, even on a cheap sound card using DarkIce as the input tool. For the input under CentOS5, I use: device = /dev/dsp # OSS DSP soundcard device for the audio input But under CentOS 6.2, there is no such device. I see /dev/snd, and it has: controlC0 hwC0D2 midiC0D1 pcmC0D0p pcmC0D2p pcmC1D0p seq controlC1 hwC1D0

Hey all. This morning I found that my audio playback is randomly sprinkled with sound skips and dropouts. I went to /var/log/yum.log and found this: Feb 09 20:18:22 Updated: lame-3.99.4-2.el6.rf.i686 I'm not saying that caused the problem but it's all I could find that changed. When I ls in /dev there is no dsp entry. That would explain why mplayer Can't open audio device

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Sean Darcy <seandarcy2 at gmail.com> wrote: > But when I run opusdec, > > opusdec 2-24-Overture_in_C_\(In_Memoriam\).opus > Decoding to 48000 Hz (2 channels) Opus files don't have a sampling rate anymore; the internal representation is most efficiently decoded to 48kHz. The metadata records the original sampling rate which make it possible

Wine requires direct access to sound device(s) to make sound. This is true for both ALSA and OSS driver back-ends. However most sound servers are not compatible with neither of these back-ends. This also true about pulse-audio - it is not fully compatible with Wine. If you using new distro (Fedora 8, Ubuntu 8.04, SuSE 11) and do not have sound you should: 1. Report problem to your distro support

Hi. I can confirm that pulse does indeed work quite well with wine. I've been using oss emulation and padsp together for a long time now, and I've had very few if any problems with it. I simply use Code: aoss padsp wine whatever and it's fine. I don't know if I need to use padsp after aoss after reading this thread, but it's what I've been doing. So pulse does mostly

Hi everyone, I have profiled Opus on AArch64. I just run opus_demo with some pcm files. Following is time proportion of FFT with different bitrate. Bitrate | Time cost by FFT/iFFT 24kb/s | 15% 48kb/s | 15% 96kb/s | 13% Any comment? I want some data close to real application, any suggestion? Thanks, Phil Wang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Since PulseAudio causes much trouble alot, why not make WINE to either 1) autodisable 2) ask to disablePulseAudio when running something ? By my understanding if this would be implemented, either of the following is done: 1) When executing wine theprogramname.exe it first calls to WINE, which then query the system for PA. Then if PA is found, WINE adds padsp to the commandline and continues

Hi, Dear alls I had encounted a problem in using opus-tool-0.2-opus-1.3(download from www.opus-codec.org, Win64 binaries: opus-tools-0.2-win64.zip). First, I use opusenc to generate a opus file which input is a 9-channels wav file. The opusenc can work. Then, I use opusdec to transform the generated opus file to wav file, but opusdec can't work. I received the error message: failed to open

Hello, I've been using Opus on an STM32 M4 platform for speech coding in mono mode. I thought I'd try stereo for grins to see if I can handle the CPU load, and I'm getting a return code of -1 from opus_decode_float (using CBR and 40ms frames). I decided to try the opusenc and opusdec tools to just see how the command line apps would behave. I am getting decoded audio, but I am

Hi I'm having a problem compiling opus-tools-0.1.7. Version opus-tools-0.1.6 seems to compile OK. I've tried with opus-1.0.3 and opus-1.1-beta. The errors are like this:- "undefined reference to `sqrtf'" etc. This OS is Peppermint Three, similar to Ubuntu 12.04. It uses:- gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 Google says it's maybe something to do

Hi all, I suppose this is a very simple question, but as I've lost already a bit of time with it, without being able to get what I wanted, I'm addressing the question to the group in the hope someone can help me. I pretend to plot the richness of herbaceous species (RichHN) as a function of time since remnant isolation (Isol) conditioned to the area of the remnant (fArea - this is a

Hi, I have found differences in quality between opus_demo and opusenc/opusdec. I used for both applications the same raw pcm file,16 bit,48khz,litle endian. i use libopus 1.1-beta and opus-tools-0.1.7. The command for opus_demo is: opus_demo audio 48000 1 64000 -cvbr -framesize 10 in.pcm out.pcm For opusenc/dec: opusenc --raw --raw-chan 1 bitrate 64 -cvbr --framesize 10 in.pcm in.opus

On 21 November 2014 at 18:06, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > > Viswanath Puttagunta wrote: >> >> a. Simplest use case to validate this optimization for correctness. >> b. Simplest use case to validate this optimization for performance. >> >> Would prefer something like opusdec that can be executed on command >> line. > >

Hi I am an Audacity (http://audacity.sourceforge.net/) developer and I'd like to see Audacity reading and writing Opus files as easily as it does others. What would you recommend as a way forward for this? I am thinking that (Win) we should ship opusenc.exe and opusdec.exe and send command line stuff to them; that way we wouldn't need to dip into your code and as you update we would

Dear all, When I install the current version of opus-tools on my Ubuntu system, I have the following problem: When I try to open the test vector 'testvector01.bit', I got the error message 'Decoding complete. This doesn't look like a Opus file'. When I open the 'testvector01.bit.opus' the decoding works fine, but the tool opus_compare mentioned, that the number of

I read through the Audio Fixes thread and tried the padsp "fix" but it didn't work on my system. I'm running PCLINUXOS 2010 with updates, and the most recent Wine update is 1.2.3. I'm trying to use a client called Advanced Voice Client (AVC) (http://squawkgear.hoppie.nl/AVC.zip) which is a VOIP client developed for the VATSIM (http://www.vatsim.net) flight simulator

using iTunes i've noticed that AAC is very good at re-encoding own lossy sound. let's test Opus! neroaacenc.exe -q 0.75 -if 000.wav -of 001.m4a neroaacdec.exe -if 001.m4a -of aac001.wav wavdiff.exe 000.wav aac001.wav Comparing 000.wav - aac001.wav... Max diff: -17.3867dB RMS diff: -33.0851dB Mean diff: -32.4582dB opusenc.exe --bitrate 512 "000.wav" 001.opus opusdec.exe 001.opus

I'm trying to setup a primitive announcement-paging system in my house using the line-out from my * box to a cheap amplifier that runs to speakers on our first and second floors from the basement. I have a extension that connects to Console, and console is set to auto-pickup. I'm using alsa drivers. This all works great, except for one thing. I want to play a tone over the console after