similar to: Total Harmonic Distortion THD

I want to go a lot deeper with my tracing of MySQL and to do so I want to look into MySQL Thread Descriptors (class THD). Inside is a great bulk of information utilized by a great many of the core functions within MySQL... I really want to get in there. So far I''ve had no luck though. It''s a C++ class, and I''m afraid that I''m approaching it like a C struct,

Hi, does anyone have small programms in C, one to encode and one to decode with celt, that I could use for a fpga chip softcore? greets yon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20100819/7cd96a41/attachment-0002.htm

Hi I am trying to evaluate the quality of the CELT codec by using the 0.8.0 testcelt tool to encode and decode the input. I want to test different bitrates and selected the below parameters for 64, 96, 128, 196, 256kB: ./celt-0.8.0/libcelt/testcelt.exe 44100 2 256 46 $1.sw $1-64kb.sw ./celt-0.8.0/libcelt/testcelt.exe 44100 2 192 46 $1.sw $1-96kb.sw ./celt-0.8.0/libcelt/testcelt.exe 44100 2 128

Oh, got it. Thanks for your explain. I misunderstand what getLocation does. If I would like to get the result of alias analysis referring to the stored value, what should I do in llvm? On 2/16/15 1:42 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Haopeng Liu" <hyliuhp at gmail.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >>

t and t2 are two pointers defined in .c file. The definitions in .bc are: %thd = alloc i64, align 8 %t = alloca i64*, align 8 %t2 = alloca i64*, align 8 .c file likes this: int thd; int *t = &thd; int *t2 = t; On 2/16/15 12:28 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Haopeng Liu" <hyliuhp at gmail.com> >> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

Yes, in my example, %1 and %2 point to t. %3 points to t2. But t and t2 point to the same var, is it? That's where I'm confused. On 2/16/15 12:37 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Haopeng Liu" <hyliuhp at gmail.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Sent:

Hi all, I am implementing a pass which needs aliasanalysis in llvm. My pass firstly records all store or load instructions as follows: loc[cnt++] = AA.getLocation(si/li); Then, get each pairwise alias result. AliasAnalysis::AliasResult ar = AA.alias(loc[i], loc[j]); switch(ar){ case 0,1,2,3;} And the command is: opt -load mypass.so -mypass -basicaa test.bc The store/load in test.bc: (1):

Hi. I just installed Centos 4. I''m pretty sure that I chose to have it install postgresql but when the system came up, it wasn''t there. No worries. I installed it from the net with ''yum''. Unfortunately, when I started it up and it tried to init the database, I got a bunch of SELinux errors: Mar 3 13:24:22 dirty kernel: audit(1109874262.006:0): avc:

Please see Shuxin's proposal on "parallelizing post-IPO stage". It seems the two projects are related. Evan On Jul 16, 2013, at 3:33 AM, "Wan, Xiaofei" <xiaofei.wan at intel.com> wrote: > Hi, community: > > For the sake of our business need, I want to enable "Function-based parallel code generation" to boost up the compilation of single module,

Hi, community: For the sake of our business need, I want to enable "Function-based parallel code generation" to boost up the compilation of single module, please see the details of the design and provide your feedbacks on below aspects, thanks! 1. Is this idea the proper solution for my requirement 2. This new feature will be enabled by llc -thd=N and has no impact on original llc when

While I think the end goal you're describing is close to the correct one, I see the high-level strategy for getting there somewhat differently: 1) The code generators are only one collection of function passes that might be parallelized. Many others might also be parallelized profitably. The design for parallelism within LLVM's pass management infrastructure should be sufficiently generic

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Wan, Xiaofei <xiaofei.wan at intel.com> wrote: > Hi, community: > > For the sake of our business need, I want to enable "Function-based parallel code generation" to boost up the compilation of single module, please see the details of the design and provide your feedbacks on below aspects, thanks! > 1. Is this idea the proper solution for

I was wondering if the developers were using anything to "objectively" test the quality of the speex vocoder. For instance PSQM or one of the many derivatives. Mean Opinion Scoring seems an expensive route. Is there some open source software to use for this? <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To

Hi, I have been using speex version 1.0.5 on a text-to-speech program. Recently I upgraded to version 1.2beta1 and noticed that the waveform the I got after encoding and decoding on the new versions (beta1,beta2) is much more different than the original than on version 1.0.5. I also ran a PESQ comparison test on 700 voice samples and got better results in the older version (I used quality 9, and

Hello, I am having a problem using sqldf. I'm trying to choose a subset of observations from a data set based on the date and maximum value of a variable by date. Here is the code I am using: test<-sqldf("select distinct * from bextuse group by sdate having bext=max(bext)",method="raw"); The result I get back is a data frame with 0 rows and 0 columns. I have tried

I was also wondering if there is a standard set of input sequences people are using to test Speex. I haven't stumbled upon it/them yet. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org [mailto:owner-speex-dev@xiph.org]On > Behalf Of Jean-Marc Valin > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:24 PM > To: speex > Subject: Re: [speex-dev] Quality > > > > I

new klibc sparc build failure against gcc 4.2 ----- Forwarded message from Kilian Krause <kilian at debian.org> ----- Subject: Bug#440721: FTBFS on sparc while linking usr/klibc/libc.so From: Kilian Krause <kilian at debian.org> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:35:23 +0200 Package: klibc Version: 1.5.6-2 Severity: serious

On 2009-09-24 22:34, hc2428 at columbia.edu wrote: > Dear developers, > When I try to map line numbers in source code back to LLVM > basicblocks, I meet some problems: there is a source file with 1500 > lines of code, but when I use BasicBlockPass to collect all > DbgStopPoint instructions in this file, I can only get 500 lines of code. > The source code and the collected

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783 Summary: please don't use client-server model for local copies Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All URL: http://lwn.net/Articles/400489/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

Dear all, I've converted a wav file to flac but during the process three wrnings were casted. One of them I recall, it said that a BEXT chunk is unrecognized and thus ignored. Wouldn't it be posible to keep the unrecognized information as is when decoding the file? In general the extra chunks are located before or after the audio content, and represents a tiny part of the whole