similar to: trouble building celt on Fedora]

Hi All, I'm looking to package up celt for inclusion in Fedora as the next stable release of ekiga/opal will have support for it. I've run into two issues in compiling it into a rpm. The first is a show stopper, then second one not so much of an issue but thought I'd report it for reference. The first issue is due to the celtdec and celtenc explicitly define rpath. I get the

Good Morning; Iam asking whether any one have knowledge about is it possiple to incorporate a psycoacoustic model?(specifically?I mean ?MPEG-1 psychoacoustic model 1) into the CELT codec(any version even older versions of the coder,?no matter) Iam using version 0.3.2. Kind Regards; Osama. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, This isn't that new anymore, but I'd let everyone know that CELT 0.10.0 is out. We've improved the quality quite a bit since the last release and we fixed many bugs. For this release, Monty has written an extensive demo page at: http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/celt/demo.html Although it's not final yet, it contains a lot of information of CELT, recent changes and

Hi everyone, I've just made the first public release of some new *experimental* codec work I've been doing (part of the vague Ghost project) with help from Monty and Timothy. This is mainly intended with developers with DSP knowledge, not for doing anything useful with it (but it does encode and decode already). Also, the main idea is *not* to replace either Speex or Vorbis, but to code

Hi everyone, I've just made the first public release of some new *experimental* codec work I've been doing (part of the vague Ghost project) with help from Monty and Timothy. This is mainly intended with developers with DSP knowledge, not for doing anything useful with it (but it does encode and decode already). Also, the main idea is *not* to replace either Speex or Vorbis, but to code

Hi everyone, I've just made the first public release of some new *experimental* codec work I've been doing (part of the vague Ghost project) with help from Monty and Timothy. This is mainly intended with developers with DSP knowledge, not for doing anything useful with it (but it does encode and decode already). Also, the main idea is *not* to replace either Speex or Vorbis, but to code

Hi everyone, I've just made the first public release of some new *experimental* codec work I've been doing (part of the vague Ghost project) with help from Monty and Timothy. This is mainly intended with developers with DSP knowledge, not for doing anything useful with it (but it does encode and decode already). Also, the main idea is *not* to replace either Speex or Vorbis, but to code

It's rather ironic that there has been more traffic generated regarding spam than actual spam. -----Original Message----- From: Ray Heasman [mailto:nurf@spamcop.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:47 PM To: vorbis-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [vorbis-dev] GOOD BUSINESS FOR YOU <p>Hi Monty, There is a way around this. You can use TMDA, which will send back a confirmation request to

Hi folks, here's a press release (yes, sorry, sorry) regarding what's going on with Xiph at the current IETF meeting. Every time we're asked 'why haven't you standardized any of your codecs through the IETF?' we explain that we've been trying for coming up on ten years. This release is about the latest step. If we (along with the other companies supporting

Hi folks, here's a press release (yes, sorry, sorry) regarding what's going on with Xiph at the current IETF meeting. Every time we're asked 'why haven't you standardized any of your codecs through the IETF?' we explain that we've been trying for coming up on ten years. This release is about the latest step. If we (along with the other companies supporting

Xiph.Org is pleased to announce that we've released Opus 1.2. The 1.2 release includes: . Speech quality improvements especially in the 12-20 kbit/s range . Improved VBR encoding for hybrid mode . More aggressive use of wider speech bandwidth, including fullband speech starting at 14 kbit/s . Music quality improvements in the 32-48 kb/s range . Generic and SSE CELT optimizations .

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Monty Montgomery <monty at xiph.org> wrote: > Vorbis-dev might be better.... > My issue is with theora/thusnelda for xiph tools. > > What I mean is, you quoted a response from Frank Barchard, but I never > saw his response on the list. Are there blind CCs on the conversation? > I'm just trying to figure out where the rest of the

> On Jan 31, 2015, at 8:04 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > > 1. The password strength decision is driven by RH corporate. So who do you believe is driving RH corporate? Why are they expending the effort to do this? The answer is clear to me: general security principles. By the time EL8 comes out, we?ll have had ~3 years of warnings under EL7 that weak

Problems building celt-0.5.2 for blackfin. Use the following to configure: #!/bin/sh # bfinconf # Set up configuration to cross compile on blackfin ./configure \ --host=bfin \ --enable-fixed-point \ CC=bfin-uclinux-gcc \ CFLAGS='-O2 '\ '-mfast-fp '\ '-ffast-math '\ '-Wall -Dlinux '\ '-D__linux__ '\ '-fno-strict-aliasing '\

So to which group should I foward my question? I thought this was the most appropriate of them all. Please guide me On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Monty Montgomery <monty at xiph.org> wrote: > I have the impression only a small piece of this conversation is being > forwarded to ogg-dev. We can't answer questions when we have no idea > what's going on :-) > >

Greets, Every linux user that sets up a sound card using sndconfig heres Linus pronouncing "Linux" - I confess that's how I learned to pronounce it right, until then I prononced it 'l-EYE-nucks' - I was wondering - what's the correct pronounciation of 'Ogg Vorbis'? I pronounce it 'OOOg' (a long 'O' sound or a portuguese 'U' if you must

Can I fix the checksum with a hex editor? Sent from my iPhone On Jun 25, 2009, at 3:23 PM, Monty Montgomery <monty at xiph.org> wrote: > Confirmed--- the checksum on the second page (the comment page where > the album art was added) is incorrect. Vorbis players are not allowed > to decode any stream in which one of the setup headers is corrupt, and > a bad checksum counts as

Am 03.12.2013 23:49, schrieb Monty Montgomery: > Any time code is stuck in a loop calling ogg_sync_pageseek() or > ogg_sync_pageout(), you'll see most of the time sunk into checksum > calculation. It's the only thing in libogg that _can_ take much time. > This is not likely a libogg bug, but a bug in the code calling libogg > in a tight loop. > > Looking at the file

Hi everyone, I'd just like to announce CELT 0.11.1 (sorry about failing to announce 0.11). The bit-stream is now is "soft-freeze", which means we won't change it unless we find bugs -- which we did between 0.11 and 0.11.1. The API should also be close to the final API. Compared to 0.10.x there are also small quality improvements, mostly at high bit-rate. I'd also like

Monty Montgomery wrote: > Yes. Without the first three packets (which hold all the codec > settings and all the instruction how to handle the subsequent packets) > the rest of the stream is gibberish. Vorbis can't even unpack the > bits without the codebooks packed into the third header. Curiosity man here. Is there a finite set of predetermined codebooks or is the codebook