similar to: Deleting certain observations (and their imprint?)

Dear R-helpers, I’ve got a summary of results from a by() call that I am making with a list of more than two of factors not very different from the example in the by() help page require(stats) by(warpbreaks[, 1], warpbreaks[, -1], summary) The result of the command gives a list of the form wool: A tension: L Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 25.00 26.00

Dear Ashim, Try spreadLevelPlot(breaks ~ interaction(tension, wool), data=warpbreaks) . I hope this helps, John ----------------------------- John Fox, Professor Emeritus McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Web: socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/ > -----Original Message----- > From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Ashim > Kapoor > Sent:

Dear All, I want a transformation which will make the spread of the response at all combinations of 2 factors the same. See for example : boxplot(breaks ~ tension * wool, warpbreaks) The closest I can do is : spreadLevelPlot(breaks ~tension , warpbreaks) spreadLevelPlot(breaks ~ wool , warpbreaks) I want to do : spreadLevelPlot(breaks ~tension * wool, warpbreaks) But I get : >

Dear Sir, Many thanks for your reply. I have a query. I have a whole set of distributions which should be made normal / homoscedastic. Take for instance the warpbreaks data set. We have the following boxplots for the warpbreaks dataset: a. boxplot(breaks ~ wool) b. boxplot(breaks ~ tension) c. boxplot(breaks ~ interaction(wool,tension)) d. boxplot(breaks ~ wool @ each level of tension) e.

Dear Ashim, I?ll address your questions briefly but they?re really not appropriate for this list, which is for questions about using R, not general statistical questions. (1) The relevant distribution is within cells of the wool x tension cross-classification because it?s the deviations from the cell means that are supposed to be normally distributed with equal variance. In the warpbreaks data

Dear All, we need to do : library(car) for the spreadLevelPlot function I forgot to say that. Apologies, Ashim On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Ashim Kapoor <ashimkapoor at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear All, > > I want a transformation which will make the spread of the response at all > combinations > of 2 factors the same. > > See for example : > >

Hello, I would like to do a large number of e.g. 1000 paired ttest using the by-function. But instead of using only the data within the 1000 groups, R caclulates 1000 times the ttest for the full data set(The same happens with Wilcoxon test). However, the by-function works fine with the lme function. Did I just miss something or is it really not working? If not, is there any other possibility to

Hi! I'm failing to understand the value of the intercept value in a multiple linear regression with categorical values. Taking the "warpbreaks" data set as an example, when I do: > lm(breaks ~ wool, data=warpbreaks) Call: lm(formula = breaks ~ wool, data = warpbreaks) Coefficients: (Intercept) woolB 31.037 -5.778 I'm able to understand that the value of

Dear all, When I use aggregate function as: attach(warpbreaks) aggregate(warpbreaks[, 1], list(wool = wool, tension = tension), sum) The results are right but I get a warning message: "number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length." BTW: I use R version 2.4.1 in Ubuntu 7.04. Your kind solutions will be great appreciated. Best wishes Yours, sincerely, Xingwang

Hi, I'd like to select one row in a data frame per subset which is maximal for a particular value. I'm pretty close to the solution in the sense that I can easily select the maximal values per subset using "aggregate", but I can't really figure out how to select the rows in the original data frame that are associated with these maximal values. library(stats) # this

Further to the discussion between Murray Jorgensen and Brian Ripley, it seems to me better to choose tabulations that will not come and bite you. Suppose your data are sligtly irregular, e.g. (for the sake of the argument): data( warpbreaks ) warpbreaks$variant <- rep( 1:5, len=54 ) attach( warpbreaks ) tb <- table( wool, tension, variant ) tb # in this case you would like to see: tp

Further to the discussion between Murray Jorgensen and Brian Ripley, it seems to me better to choose tabulations that will not come and bite you. Suppose your data are sligtly irregular, e.g. (for the sake of the argument): data( warpbreaks ) warpbreaks$variant <- rep( 1:5, len=54 ) attach( warpbreaks ) tb <- table( wool, tension, variant ) tb # in this case you would like to see: tp

I am attempting to produce crosstabulations between two variables for subgroups defined by a third factor variable. I'm using by() and CrossTable() in package gmodels. I get the printing of the tables first and then a printing of each level of the INDICES. For example: library(gmodels) by(warpbreaks, warpbreaks$tension, function(x){CrossTable(x$wool, x$breaks > 30,

Hi all: I have a quesion about ANOVA: Is SS(Sum of Square) of a specific factor constant with the number of factors changing? dat1 includes one factor g1,and g1's SS is called SS_g1_dat1. dat2 includes two factors g1,g2,and g1's SS is called SS_g1_dat2. My quesion is: Is SS_g1_dat1 equals to SS_g1_dat2? I have both "yes" and "no" reasons for the quesion,but

I have a specific question and a general question. Specific Question: I want to do an analysis on a data frame by 2 or more class variables (i.e., use 2 or more columns in a dataframe to do statistical classing). Coming from SAS, I'm used to being able to take a data set and have the output of the analysis in a dataset for further manipulation. I have a data set with vote totals, with one

Hi All, I am currently doing the following to compute summary statistics of aggregated data: a = aggregate(warpbreaks$breaks, warpbreaks[,-1], mean) b = aggregate(warpbreaks$breaks, warpbreaks[,-1], sum) c = aggregate(warpbreaks$breaks, warpbreaks[,-1], length) ans = cbind(a, b[,3], c[,3]) This seems unnecessarily complex to me so I tried > aggregate(warpbreaks$breaks, warpbreaks[,-1],

Hi, I am seeking help with an error when running the example from R Documentation for TukeyHSD. The error occurs with any example I run, from any text book or website. thank you... > plot(TukeyHSD(fm1, "tension")). Error in plot(confint(as.glht(x)), ylim = c(0.5, n.contrasts + 0.5), ...) : error in evaluating the argument 'x' in selecting a method for function

Hello All, Am learning to create tables with n(%) formatting using R. Below is a working example. I think this is not bad but wondered if there are better ways of doing it. Although it can be quite humbling, seeing good code helps me assess my progress as an R programmer. Ultimately want to have code that I can turn into a function. Will then use the output produced to make tables using

hi list, i have to ask you again, having tried and searched for several days... i want to do a TukeyHSD after an Anova, and want to get the adjusted p-values after the Tukey Correction. i found the p.adjust function, but it can only correct for "holm", "hochberg", bonferroni", but not "Tukey". Is it not possbile to get adjusted p-values after

Hi all, Please, is there any way of controlling factors in row/columns when using ftable/xtabs? As far as I can see, the last cross-clasifing variable in the formula will appear in columns. The previous ones, in rows. For instance, is it possible to make tension and replicate appear in columns? ftable(xtabs(breaks ~ wool + tension + replicate, data = warpbreaks)) After some years using SAS