similar to: Umask of Homedir

Hello, I following the instrucions of: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Permissions When the user receive the first mail, dovecot create the directory structure always using mode 0700, if i change the permission of the user maildir all new mails arrived get the correct umask: dovecot: lmtp(24960, *): Debug: Namespace INBOX.: Using permissions from .../maildir: mode=0770 The problem is:

Hello, I use pam_winbind for users authentification and pam_mount for mounting homedirs stored on w2k3 fiel server. I still have two more problems to solve: 1. I?m not able to set proper access rights on homedir. I want to set them to 700 but after mounting the homedir access rights are set to 777. I used to use pam_mkhomedir umask=0077 attribute to set proper rights, but this have no effect

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3549 Summary: rsync applies umask to some directories even when a default ACL takes effect Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

Hello. I would like to have rights like 750 in my mailboxes (in /var/mail/vmails/domain.tld/user). http://wiki.dovecot.org/DovecotServerInstallations/RHEL/2_Users?highlight=(mask) I see an option called umask (in dovecot.conf). I set umask = 0750 in dovecot.conf. This option add good rights to directories, but not to the mail received (always in 700). Do you have a solution? Thanks. -- -

I have the samba problems solved thanks to the help of folks on this forum, but I do not have the php umask problems solved. The www directory is /var/www/html and the html directory is owned by apache and is in the apache groups with the following permissions: drwxrwsr-- A sub-driectory, /var/www/html/viewpoints has the same attributes as the html directory, however when php creates a

I have the samba problems solved thanks to the help of folks on this forum, but I do not have the php umask problems solved. The www directory is /var/www/html and the html directory is owned by apache and is in the apache groups with the following permissions: drwxrwsr-- A sub-driectory, /var/www/html/viewpoints has the same attributes as the html directory, however when php creates a

Hey all, We have the following set in /etc/profile : umask 0002 so that it will affect all users. That should create all files as 664 and all directories as 775 if I'm not mistaken. Well I logged into the machine after this was set and just created a file as one of the users who complained about permissions settings on files. And this is what I saw: [user1 at qa_host ~]$ ls -l test_qa

Using dovecot 1.0rc15, together with postfix and dovecot-lda. umask is set to 0007. This should ensure directories and files get created with read/write permissions for both user and group. However, dovecot-lda writes files with 600 permissions, instead of 660. So dovecot does not seem to respect the umask configuration property for local mail delivery. In my particular case, I have

I'm trying to figure out how to cause rsync to create the file on the backup server with 700 permission and specific owner "some_user" (not root) I try to do it in several way with no success. The command I'm using is: rsync -r -t -v -z /dir some_user@server::module so that it don't copy permission It always give the files 744 permission, that mean that every on can read

Am 15.07.20 um 20:02 schrieb Emmett Culley via CentOS: > On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS >> <centos at centos.org <mailto:centos at centos.org>> wrote: >> >> >> ??? Thanks for the info.? I hadn't seen that before nor many of the >> links.? I had seen the suggested systemd

I want to control the mode of newly created boxes. The official documentation here: https://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Permissions , under Permissions for new mailboxes says this: "When creating a new mailbox, Dovecot copies the permissions from the mailbox root directory. For example with mboxes if you have directories" But it seems to be untrue. I checked it, it soesn't

On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS <centos at centos.org <mailto:centos at centos.org>> wrote: > > > Thanks for the info.? I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links.? I had seen the suggested systemd fix, but have never been able got them to work. And I've tried many combinations.? Still

Is there anyway inside of rails to change the umask on the files created in the "tmp" directory? I tried adding "File.umask 0000" to config/enviroment.rb and no go. I''m afraid I''m a complete noob when it comes to ruby and rails. Here''s the situation. We''re trying to set up a RoR development enviroment, but the files for most of our

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm very happy with Dovecot and wish the best for its continued development. It's a true testament to brilliant componentised design and Unix philosophy. Configuration made easy because of the way the file is parsed and a single point of startup make it ridiculously straightforward (and lovely) to administer. But of course, we all

hello all i run dovecot as my imap server on my university and squirrel as webmail. But squirrel returns an error: ERROR : Connection dropped by imap-server CAPABILITY i tail my /var/log/dovecot and this is the output with whatever user i try to log in and view mails: dovecot: Nov 13 17:51:27 Fatal: chdir(/home/epp719) failed with uid 2975: Permission denied dovecot: Nov 13 17:51:27 Error:

Hello, I have noticed that the -u parameter to the sftp-server or internal-sftp subsystem is not working correctly. For openssh-5.6p1 I believe that the problem lies in this code, starting at line 1414 in sftp-server.c: ---------------------------------------------------------- case 'u': mask = (mode_t)strtonum(optarg, 0, 0777, &errmsg); if (errmsg != NULL)

Hi, I have a question about file permissions and how they are affected by a client's umask. To illustrate my question, I issued the following commands first on a local ext3 file system and then on a cifs file system: $ umask 0002 $ touch f1 $ echo xx > f2 $ umask 0022 $ touch f3 $ echo xx > f4 $ ls -l On Ext3, the output is: -rw-rw-r-- 1 abdv29 users 0 Oct 9 00:31 f1 -rw-rw-r-- 1

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:36:34 +0200 Philipp Snizek via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Von: Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > > An: samba at lists.samba.org > > Datum: 22.09.2016 13:18 > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] permissions of new files and directories > > Gesendet von: "samba" <samba-bounces at

Hello, I have tried setting umask 0027 for tftpd, so files are created with permissions 0640. However, tftpd-hpa refused uploading a file with error "must have global write permissions". Looking at the source, I could avoid this issue by using "-p" option. However, it also seems that the umask is not applied when the "-p" option is used. Can anyone explain this

> Von: Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > An: samba at lists.samba.org > Datum: 22.09.2016 15:14 > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Antwort: Re: permissions of new files and directories > Gesendet von: "samba" <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:36:34 +0200 > Philipp Snizek via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>